Discussion about turbo cams, overlap, boost and reversion
#121
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
oh awesome, this is music to my ears, i like, yeh i'll be running 11/11.1:1 n/a but can swap head gaskets out to drop to 10.3/5:1 for a bit safer, i know not ideal way swapping head gaskets. i know stock and FI seems to be ok to a certain point and most strokers have beefed up internals, a 114lsa cam might be on the cards over a 112, slightly smoother idle and should work well with both then.
Thanks guys.
Thanks guys.
Last edited by ausls1; 10-05-2011 at 07:17 AM.
#123
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Another thing that has to be looked at is type of fuel. E85 produces much more exhaust volume, so a n engine will flow as if it has more ci on the exhaust stroke. I may benefit having a larger lift on the exhaust lobe(and/or duration depending on head flow/valve size/turbine size). Maybe a more agressive lobe?
#124
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Bump this up, great stuff here. Sticky worthy!! Its odd to me though that the MS3 worked so well with a turbo application. But after reading all 7 pages of this ive come to realize that cam specs for turbo applications are about 50% science and 50% voodoo. Im just interested in how people are seeing great results with agressive N/A cams.
#126
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Bump this up, great stuff here. Sticky worthy!! Its odd to me though that the MS3 worked so well with a turbo application. But after reading all 7 pages of this ive come to realize that cam specs for turbo applications are about 50% science and 50% voodoo. Im just interested in how people are seeing great results with agressive N/A cams.