402 F1C results. 8 rib belt
#22
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow squeezing 200rwhp with those changes is a lot.
i have a question for the thread:
it seems more and more now that everyone is going with the vic jr and elbow setup over the ls6 intake. is it that much more efficient? pros and cons? what range is that intake?
edit: it says 3500rpm-7500rpm on epp site
i have a question for the thread:
it seems more and more now that everyone is going with the vic jr and elbow setup over the ls6 intake. is it that much more efficient? pros and cons? what range is that intake?
edit: it says 3500rpm-7500rpm on epp site
Last edited by airforcemanss; 10-26-2009 at 07:19 PM.
#24
wow squeezing 200rwhp with those changes is a lot.
i have a question for the thread:
it seems more and more now that everyone is going with the vic jr and elbow setup over the ls6 intake. is it that much more efficient? pros and cons? what range is that intake?
edit: it says 3500rpm-7500rpm on epp site
i have a question for the thread:
it seems more and more now that everyone is going with the vic jr and elbow setup over the ls6 intake. is it that much more efficient? pros and cons? what range is that intake?
edit: it says 3500rpm-7500rpm on epp site
We swapped an LS2 intake for a FAST 92mm intake on one engine, and we saw a huge increase in power along with a reduction in boost by 2 psi. The The LS2 intake is known to be a loser in the power department, but we were shocked by seeing the horsepower go from 809 to 864! Here is a link to this build. http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=29 Bob