Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

if you havent seen a 91mm T-4 turbo (trick or treat)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2009, 01:31 PM
  #81  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 05crew
i have been looking at making my 408lsx a 427lsx. would this 91mm t4 be the trick? i have a 88mm mid-fra. now and i am looing at making 1000rwhp, but i have been told that it cant be done with the 88mm???? it made 821 at 18psi on stock 317s, and i just got some new trickflow 235, do you think i can make 1000rwhp on the 408 with the 88mm? or go the the 91. orrr. do i have to go to a t-6?

BTW- its in a 5700lbs denali
You should really be using a T6 with an engine that big, unless you absolutely cant fit one.
biggest "I" would go would be 370ish cubes with a T4.
Old 11-20-2009, 01:59 PM
  #82  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Snyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
It can be done. 1012rwhp we did with a customers LT1. Problem is the turbo is done and doesn't hold up as you start to over spin that unit at that point. Also that was on a 355. As the motor ci's go up the power will go down and back pressure will go through the roof.

Well I plan on staying stock cubed LS2(or as close as I can) and I only want to make 1000whp on the dyno(as bragging rights) and I plan on running the car at 650-850 on the street/track
Old 11-21-2009, 08:25 AM
  #83  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
CarsandWomen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: houston TX
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snyper
Well I plan on staying stock cubed LS2(or as close as I can) and I only want to make 1000whp on the dyno(as bragging rights) and I plan on running the car at 650-850 on the street/track
yeah snyper well see how long that lasts, we dont call it the "boost bug" cuz it sounds cute
Old 11-21-2009, 09:59 AM
  #84  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Snyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

haha...if im not happy with that then ill never be happy.
Old 11-21-2009, 05:28 PM
  #85  
Restricted User
 
FMS_FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Could always be good idea for twin turbo t4's. Humm might look into that.
Old 11-21-2009, 05:59 PM
  #86  
Staging Lane
 
Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ouch, now that looks real serious for a T4 and a sweet setup.
Old 11-22-2009, 08:04 PM
  #87  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95lsxss
So this will be decent on a lq9? untill i go built...?
The new 91 I'm sure would make plenty of power for you.
Old 11-23-2009, 04:53 PM
  #88  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
blackonblacksls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How well do you think this would work on a 302 modmotor? 9.7 compression. E85.. a lot of rpm and a sixspeed? 30psi or so?
Old 11-23-2009, 05:03 PM
  #89  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
Yeah but I don't think he's made over 900rwhp yet. Maybe he can chime in.
It takes over 1000rwhp to go 8.7 @ 160.

EDIT: At MM's weight
Old 11-23-2009, 05:03 PM
  #90  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blackonblacksls
How well do you think this would work on a 302 modmotor? 9.7 compression. E85.. a lot of rpm and a sixspeed? 30psi or so?
Probably would make stupid amounts of power.....lol
Old 11-23-2009, 07:40 PM
  #91  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
blackonblacksls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

any clue on spool? would it be a decent choice or would there be a better option?

My car with an s374 ran 10.7@133 and some 134 traps this past weekend.. THat was with 10.9 psi and a 1.8 60ft...... damn 255 radials didnt get it done.

Shift points anywhere from 7500 to 7900 rpm.....

What is the downpipe out let size?
Old 11-23-2009, 07:48 PM
  #92  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

it made 995 with worse heads and lower compression when 6 speed w/ 1psi less boost and a little less timing than now.

that exact same set up made 893 rwhp unlocked 4l80

i figure with the above changes it picked up 100rw. with the 91 i am looking for another 100 on top of that.

i still would like an inlet cover for the 91 cut down to 4" od... certainly you guys have the capability??
Old 11-23-2009, 07:52 PM
  #93  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
blackonblacksls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have talked to one of the guys at forced inductions before... I am on the waiting list for the new gtx 80mm coming out... But a 91 would be fun and different im sure....

Maybe make for some good texas mile runs, and some rediculous trapspeed 1/4mile passes.

And keep my current unit, or maybe the gtx45 for the street and some grudgeracing.
Old 11-24-2009, 10:32 AM
  #94  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
it made 995 with worse heads and lower compression when 6 speed w/ 1psi less boost and a little less timing than now.

that exact same set up made 893 rwhp unlocked 4l80

i figure with the above changes it picked up 100rw. with the 91 i am looking for another 100 on top of that.

i still would like an inlet cover for the 91 cut down to 4" od... certainly you guys have the capability??
Yeah we can machine it down. Send it in....
Old 11-24-2009, 12:15 PM
  #95  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Snyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
Yeah we can machine it down. Send it in....
is that something you could do with all of them?
Old 11-24-2009, 01:17 PM
  #96  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

yes...no problem
Old 11-24-2009, 05:01 PM
  #97  
Banned Village Idiot
iTrader: (36)
 
LS1BLKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Anaheim,CA
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

would this turbo be way too much for a 5.3 build?
Old 11-24-2009, 08:52 PM
  #98  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1BLKSS
would this turbo be way too much for a 5.3 build?
Depends...how much power. If you are looking for 1000+rwhp T4, then no it would work quite well.
Old 11-24-2009, 10:17 PM
  #99  
Teching In
 
KB240LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you think it would spool like on a 5.3L? Lets say starting at 2krpm in 4th gear of a T56.
Old 11-24-2009, 10:39 PM
  #100  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
blackonblacksls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thats what i want to know? how will this thing spool on small small motors 5.0 5.3 area..


Quick Reply: if you havent seen a 91mm T-4 turbo (trick or treat)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 AM.