TTSSZ

iTrader: (8)

[Ill take it, pm me, I need it bad!

TTSSZ

arnie

So, the relocation of the turbos, from below to front up top, was done primarily, for/because of pysical space limitation reasons, and not done specifically, for more efficiency/torque, comparing apples to apples (same turbos) or response then? Thanks.

Reckless

iTrader: (9)

If you are referring to Harlan's car, the new turbos are 60mm units, as opposed to 35mm I think.

TwnTrboCE

iTrader: (43)

PM and email sent. Looks like the kit is sold.

arnie, trying to mount twins up top in our cars without loosing something is impossible. Such as ABS, A/C, power steering, fuse blocks, or battery relocation. This is why all the twin kits are mounted low. Most people who want a twin kit aren't building just a race car and want to keep all the goodies. Mounting up top has advantages though. Gravity oil drain, larger turbos, larger exhaust, and the fact that it looks bad ***.

White_Hawk

iTrader: (3)

Just an FYI (somebody asked earlier). I talked to John Craig at Limit Engineering and he said that there were no upgrades that you could do to these turbo's to improve the performance. His website shows bigger compressor wheels and stuff, but none of them work with the Incon setup. Just thought I would throw that out there.

-Geoff

verbs

Aren't you selling your QMP turbo kit?

Time2Kill

iTrader: (49)

Yes, if I got the Incon TT I would of built a new engine to suit the smaller turbos.

y2khawk

iTrader: (5)

66mm actually

hard to compare old to new, i went from a basically mis-cammed hydralic, under turbo'd, air to air setup, to a solid roller, proper cam, happy turbo, ice water to air.

Now if i can just convince myself to put in the 400, we'll be movin then