Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Survey says... 705rwhp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2004 | 01:16 PM
  #21  
blackz93's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 1
From: nc
Default

glad to see its all coming together now. i have been wanting to see what power that thing was going to make ever since i signed up on here...
Old 01-15-2004 | 01:19 PM
  #22  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Thread Starter
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 44,830
Likes: 1,251
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I was just talking to Mike @ Yank, and he said he thinks the T400 loss is 16%, but I think he's wrong.
Old 01-15-2004 | 01:21 PM
  #23  
InvisibleSun's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

Congrats! Incredible numbers! Glad to see your quest is nearly at an end.
Old 01-15-2004 | 01:26 PM
  #24  
gator's 99TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 2
From: Tampa Bay
Default

simply awesome awesome awesome. cant wait to see the dyno graph. where did this combo peak?

also john, for years we have been talking about mn6 cars loosing 12-15% and autos (4L60e) loosing 18-20% but ofcourse it gets skewed at your power level. i believe teh th-400 would loose as much power if not more as the 4l60e - but this is speculative.
Old 01-15-2004 | 01:32 PM
  #25  
BIGBOS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,603
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town, IL
Default

Congrats again John, glad to see everything is working out now..........

I can't wait to see that monster run at the track...........

I would say that the loss with a TH400 is no less than 20%
Old 01-15-2004 | 01:53 PM
  #26  
scottywheels's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 49
Default

awesome John. I am glad to see it coming to gether for you. Now I really cant wait to race in the spring. I just want to get my tranny fixed and run the car...lol 9.50's here you come
Old 01-15-2004 | 02:00 PM
  #27  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Thread Starter
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 44,830
Likes: 1,251
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Scott, I think an intercooler swap will make a very big difference, based on that conversation we had a while back, I am running 5 more degrees of timing with the same gas. I really held back on bigtime pimping the Griffin stuff until I saw the numbers were going up and we were still running 23 degrees of timing.
Old 01-15-2004 | 02:13 PM
  #28  
BIGBOS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,603
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town, IL
Default

I see one of those bad boys in my future.....
Old 01-15-2004 | 02:14 PM
  #29  
scottywheels's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 49
Default

if the convertor is efficiant, we have seen cars make more power with the T400 and a good convertor , over the 4l60e with a convertor.
Old 01-15-2004 | 03:23 PM
  #30  
InductionConcepts's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default

Great numbers guy! So what cc dish are your pistons? How much compression drop do the 6.0L heads give you, say on a stock compression block? What is the cc of LS1 heads? What is the cc of LS6 heads?

Congrats!
Old 01-15-2004 | 04:18 PM
  #31  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Thread Starter
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 44,830
Likes: 1,251
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Diamond pistons:
3.905 3.622 6.125 1.315 4314 .927x2.950 -8.6cc

6.0 heads have 70cc chambers stock, LS1 heads have 67cc chambers, I did the 6.0's mostly for the stage II porting and valvework more so than the compression drop since my 6.0's were cut to 69cci so the difference is only 2cc.

LS6 heads are 64cc's I believe. 6.0 heads are lower compression LS6 heads basically, and I did mine because they flow over 330/220 which I wanted. (Not the best 6.0 head flow numbers out there either these numbers are fairly average)
Old 01-15-2004 | 05:34 PM
  #32  
InductionConcepts's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default

Hey, thanks for the info!
Old 01-15-2004 | 06:01 PM
  #33  
NA$TY-TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,333
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

Way to go John............... Hopefully us ATI guys can hit numbers like that when we get this Cog pulley stuff straightened out......
I would be very happy with numbers like that with my new setup.
Kyle
Old 01-15-2004 | 06:36 PM
  #34  
BIGBOS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,603
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town, IL
Default

Yea, I would be happy as well.......
Old 01-15-2004 | 06:57 PM
  #35  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Thread Starter
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 44,830
Likes: 1,251
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I'm sure you guys will figure out the cog setups. Who knows I might do one too someday.

Intmd8, can you email me the datalog so I can send it to Craig at FAST?
Old 01-15-2004 | 07:34 PM
  #36  
VINCE's Avatar
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,260
Likes: 4
From: Valrico, Florida
Default

Wow!!! Congrats John!!!!!!!!! That monster is coming along..
Old 01-15-2004 | 07:50 PM
  #37  
Trojan T/A's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal
Default

Awesome results John; now you just need to send in the YS for the YSi upgrade and put down 800rwhp. I'm curious what the flow rating of the intercooler is?
Old 01-15-2004 | 07:53 PM
  #38  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Thread Starter
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 44,830
Likes: 1,251
From: Chicago, IL
Default

The YS is rated at 1500 cfm and the Griffin intercooler was designed by Jim Burns over there to support that.

I would be curious to see what the YSi + C16 could do actually.
Old 01-15-2004 | 08:25 PM
  #39  
Hardtop's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 0
From: LaPlata, Md.
Default

Very nice. Congrats.


Bruce
Old 01-15-2004 | 09:55 PM
  #40  
Black LS1 T/A's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 8
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Let me see if they can get us dyno graph today.

It was hard for them to get a solid torque reading since it's a non lockup converter, but it was around 625rwtq I think.

Doug I have heard 10% loss for T56 setups.

Smokin, I am going to remove the 4.11 gear and install a 3.70 or 3.50 gear. I will race on a 28x10.5 M/T ET Drag.
Man, that's awesome!

If I can venture a question... is RWHP on the dyno derived from the RWTQ value? I thought a dyno effectively measured torque, and HP was a computed value.

Anyway, great numbers... there's probably more in it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM.