Navy David SS

iTrader: (13)

Man, you have to run a 9.53 or better just to be in the top 100. The LS engine has come a long way since I started 9 years ago. 11's use to be top of the heap. Now, if you don't run 8's, well what else can I say.

David

bad6as

iTrader: (17)

im trying to get to the top 50 on 275's boy do i have work to do

Broke EF

We are in the same boat! Good luck

Sean

Pro Stock John

iTrader: (34)

Yeah 9.53 is the bump, how neat is that...

Eventually I hope to make it sortable by tire etc., but first I wanted to get the basic list set up, and then phase II I'd like to add a picture for each car.

Beaflag VonRathburg

iTrader: (176)

This is a really cool list you're putting together. I like the idea and hope some day to be able to crack a decent number on it.

I don't know if he is one of the people you listed that you hadn't put on there yet, but LTLHOMER ran Harlan's old twin turbo kit to some pretty decent times.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...deos-pics.html

8.781 at 161.00 on the limiter through the traps. 1.358 60 ft. 3393 lbs.

NA$TY-TA

iTrader: (21)

John my car should be #77 9.26@150.58


TA 98
Kyle Farley
9.26@150.58
370ci LQ9, Best Machine
317 casting Best Machine
GMPP Carbed drilled for Inj. Intake
Transmission Rossler Powerglide
Raceweight 3330 lbs
Tire size 28X10 ET Drag


Wheels, Weld Alumstars 15x3.5", 15X10
Stenod Built S88 Turbo Kit.
Rearend, manufacturer Starnge S60


Kyle

Pro Stock John

iTrader: (34)

Thanks guys, looks like I have about 7 updates/changes/additions in 24 hours.

I like working on stuff like this so I don't mind it.

AnnivSS

I guess thats why the link wont work or is my work internet not liking the site?

Pro Stock John

iTrader: (34)

update going live in 2 min, kyle who drove on that 9.26 you or matt or joe?

longrange4u

iTrader: (2)

John... Edit...

My 9.72 run... name is Jared Shepard and it was in my 02 SS not the CETA.

Thanks!! PS: will be moving below #75 before end of year

IWGF

iTrader: (6)

lbz34 (Sean Stanford, Solid-Technology and Performance) should be on the list somewhere. He ran a 9.49 a while back. I'll get full details for you.

EDIT: Here is the details from his sig: 00 Z28 | STP 408,TEA Stg2,PT88,PT A2A,HPT 3 Bar,Vic Jr.,PG,9"
| 9.50@148, PT88 25 psi race gas, 7800 DA, 991 HP Corrected

His car should be pretty nasty whenever he finishes the new setup...

Broke EF

Damn we are getting pushed pretty far down this list!! At least I know next year we will have much more power so we can move it on up

Sean

Pro Stock John

iTrader: (34)

It's pretty crazy that #100 is a 9.3x car. I'm probably only missing 3-4 8 second cars now I think.

lafinrat

iTrader: (1)

I was hoping for a better time before the season ended here, but that didn't happen. Although I am grateful for what I did run considering I hurt my old 5.3 in July then wrecked the car bad in August. I was able to run 175 mph last Saturday, only with a slower 8.33 et. There's always next year. Or I can take this thing to a lower track and see what it'll do. My 8.26 was ran at 7076 ft DA and that's very low for Denver.

Sluggish

iTrader: (10)

You have 2 #27s

Pro Stock John

iTrader: (34)

Thanks sluggish, I'm going to move the list to some format that is easier to use.

Aaron, great job with the Nova at that crazy DA.

I think 1-2 folks could drop lower in the 7's if they tried, but winter is coming (Andy).

Pro Stock John

iTrader: (34)

And the top 100 are 9.27 or quicker, wow.

Bob@BruteSpeed

iTrader: (16)

Awesome list! At 9.12 I'll bet I'll be off the list in several days the way things are going, if not sooner! Bob

Beaflag VonRathburg

iTrader: (176)

If I was you I'd almost want to see what that thing would do around sea level. What heads are you running and are you still sporting the stock crank?

Pro Stock John

iTrader: (34)

Does anyone recall the year of the Ohio's black firebird, was it a '95 or something? I'm going to add it to the list tomorrow. I think it was wrecked in 2007 or early 2008. It went a best of 8.12@180 MPH per Mr. Turley.