Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

D581 coil limitations with FI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2016, 01:15 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Science.

Thank you for the information.
Old 10-04-2016, 01:42 AM
  #22  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pantera EFI
Thanks David, though I would like to add some information.

OEM's like a large plug gap AND wires that have resistance.
There verification is based on great amounts of testing.
Those who "boast" their low resistance (0) wires are fools.

The facts are such, current flow travels AROUND the outside of the wire.
A wire with a small resistance (50-250 Ohm) will allow longer ARC Duration.
Spark Duration is VERY important at lower RPMs.

When the ignition coil is full of electrons, they ALL must go somewhere.
The best path is into the cylinder at the plug gap, all of them will pass when ionization voltage is present.
The arc must be established by the higher voltage needed for ionization to start, then drops as current flows.
This is where a small wire resistance will help increase are duration by limiting current flow.
The same amount of current, just over a greater amount of time.

Lance
I kind of get what your saying man, but I think you are preaching to the wrong ears. So the factory discovered that some resistance in the wire was a good thing at low rpm cause it helped hold the spark duration longer..............When was the last time someone was in the forced induction section looking to get a nice increase in power below 3000 rpm?



Quick Reply: D581 coil limitations with FI?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.