Pros and Cons to 2 bar vs. 3 bar map??
The 2.5 bar sensor works just fine for either 2 or 3 bar operating systems since it's up to you to fill in the appropriate values for the map sensor. Only reason I see to use the 2.5 sensor though over the cobalt ss 2 bar sensor (since it's so much more expensive) is for more boost and that that point you would need a 3 bar OS. The scaling would be accurate with the 3 bar OS it just reads up to 2.5 bar max.
I thought there was an oem 2.5 map sensor that worked that was much cheaper?
The 2.5 bar sensor works just fine for either 2 or 3 bar operating systems since it's up to you to fill in the appropriate values for the map sensor. Only reason I see to use the 2.5 sensor though over the cobalt ss 2 bar sensor (since it's so much more expensive) is for more boost and that that point you would need a 3 bar OS. The scaling would be accurate with the 3 bar OS it just reads up to 2.5 bar max.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Any more info on this? And do any of you use/have a part number for a plug and play 3 bar sensor?
Thanks guys
Last edited by Exidous; Dec 28, 2013 at 01:53 PM.
He was talking about how that sensor is for late model cars with configurable OS and boost tables.
And that there is only a 2 bar OS and 3 bar OS, no 2.5.
Then what your basically saying is that you use a 3 bar OS and reference the fuel tables to determine what to set the tune at I guess, not boost?
A 2 Bar or 3 Bar OS can be used. You will get a max of 2.5Bar either way. At vacuum they are the same. At boost the amount of boost per cell is what is different. To it, 5v is 210kPa with a 2Bar OS and 315kPa with a 3Bar OS. The sensor however, reads 5v as 2.5Bar.
HPTuners as an example. As you scan the PID's you are seeing the normal vacuum driving around. Some goof off Mustang comes near and you get into max boost. For simplicity you are running a 2bar with 2.5bar MAP. At WOT (2.5Bar) your PCM registers 210kPa or 2Bar. You change the 210kPa vs RPM cells to make your AFR 11:1 or whatever you are using and beat the crap out of the mustang without blowing up. :-p
What you are technically doing is adjusting the fueling for 2.5Bar even though the cells in the PCM read 2Bar.
Unless anyone else disagrees with that...?
You could try sucking on the sensor while looking at your laptop, and see if that drops the KPA below 105.
Last edited by BAADGOAT; Dec 29, 2013 at 11:49 PM.








