Pros and Cons to 2 bar vs. 3 bar map??
Pulling this off top of my head soo someone please correct me if im wrong
You only have 0-5 volts to tune in with. 2 bar cuts in in 1/2, 3 bar cut's it to a 1/3 on drivability table's.
2 bar can be used in applications where you run more than 15lbs of boost, but that is up to your tuner.
In my experience I have not noticed a difference in resolution issues when the 3 bar map is mounted correctly vs the factory style 2 bar.

2 bar is 15 to 210kpa 5kpa per cell. 400-8000rpm, 400rpm per cell
3 bar is 15 to 315kpa, 5kpa per cell between 15 and 105kpa, 10kpa per cell between 110 and 315kpa. 400-8000rpm, 400rpm per cell.
3bar is more resolution than you will ever need. I don't recall ever tuning one and saying "I wish I had another row that split this one by 5kpa".
My preference is to use the newer 2.5 bar map sensor out there since it's accurate as hell and run a 3 bar OS.
Trending Topics
If you can tune a 3bar SD car to have perfect fuel trims in every cell up to 105kpa and then perfect air/fuel ratio at every boost level above that, I see no reasoning to back up any resolution argument.
JMO
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Chances are I'll drive it at this level for a while, but a 2.5 bar sensor does sound tempting as another 7psi of boost would put me at 21 or 22 psi of boost.
I didn't realize that the 3 bar map sensor had normal resolution in vacum, that would make normal drivability just as good as it is now.
Chances are I'll drive it at this level for a while, but a 2.5 bar sensor does sound tempting as another 7psi of boost would put me at 21 or 22 psi of boost.
I didn't realize that the 3 bar map sensor had normal resolution in vacum, that would make normal drivability just as good as it is now.
so hows that build comin anyways?
Dennis







