Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Should I run a meth kit??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 09:26 AM
  #21  
stngtamr29's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville NC
Default

Originally Posted by ZNix
I think they are in the 550-600 range. But they are worth it for that price. You run STRAIGHT Methanol through his pump (best cooling effect). No oil additive or anything. If you cannot find meth, you can even use denatured alcohol off the shelf of a hardware store (expensive, but good in a pinch, also little harsher on the pump). I put the kit in myself in only a couple hours (17 year old mechanic here). Somebody on here is using it in their 580HP procharged LS1 on a stock short block.

Nix
I also use alkycontrol with a 100% meth and love it. jeff
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 10:05 AM
  #22  
ZNix's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 193
Likes: 30
From: Plympton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
No, it's not. It evaporates quicker, so yes, it will give you a lower reading at the IAT sensor, but once it hits the combustion chamber and ignites, it adds to the overall heat in the chamber. Water on the other hand, cools as it evaporates, which is slower at ambient temps, but once it hits the chamber, pulls out considerably more heat, and since it doesn't ignite, it doesn't add anymore heat back into the piston/chamber like methanol does.

Does methanol make more power, YES, but it also adds more heat. On a stock shortblock, the pistons and rings can't handle the extra heat, remember horsepower is directly related to heat. More power, more heat.

Here's a chart showing the difference between how much heat the methanol absorbs versus water...

100% Water is on the left, 100% meoh is on the right.


I'm not opposed at all to running 100% meoh because you will make more power than mixing in water with it, but if you're after a cooling effect, 50/50 is what I would (and will) run.

Remember, knock is also very sensitive to heat, hence why we run cooler plugs.
I stand corrected. I can see where this would be an issue on a car not designed for FI. Buicks don't have this issues, so straight Meth has been great for the IAT reduction, and octane increase so we can run WAY more boost than stock. I myself am running just over 26PSI of boost on a stock short block, while others have seen 30+.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 10:14 AM
  #23  
speedfreak2685's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
No, it's not. It evaporates quicker, so yes, it will give you a lower reading at the IAT sensor, but once it hits the combustion chamber and ignites, it adds to the overall heat in the chamber. Water on the other hand, cools as it evaporates, which is slower at ambient temps, but once it hits the chamber, pulls out considerably more heat, and since it doesn't ignite, it doesn't add anymore heat back into the piston/chamber like methanol does.

Does methanol make more power, YES, but it also adds more heat. On a stock shortblock, the pistons and rings can't handle the extra heat, remember horsepower is directly related to heat. More power, more heat.

Here's a chart showing the difference between how much heat the methanol absorbs versus water...

100% Water is on the left, 100% meoh is on the right.


I'm not opposed at all to running 100% meoh because you will make more power than mixing in water with it, but if you're after a cooling effect, 50/50 is what I would (and will) run.

Remember, knock is also very sensitive to heat, hence why we run cooler plugs.
Interesting. Exactly what I was thinking because ultimately my IAT are fine, its the combustion temps i was concerned about.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 11:19 AM
  #24  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

Originally Posted by ZNix
I stand corrected. I can see where this would be an issue on a car not designed for FI. Buicks don't have this issues, so straight Meth has been great for the IAT reduction, and octane increase so we can run WAY more boost than stock. I myself am running just over 26PSI of boost on a stock short block, while others have seen 30+.

I agree 100% with you. On a motor built to see boost, the rings and bearings have tolerances designed to handle the higher heat seen from a forced induction setup, so running 100% methanol is fine. But on a stock ls1, with rings gapped as tight as 0.009" (mine were between 0.010 and 0.012") high heat from forced induction is a recipe for disaster. The water helps to keep the chamber temps a little friendlier.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 01:08 PM
  #25  
02gangsta/ss's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: leominster ma
Default

Originally Posted by ZNix
I think they are in the 550-600 range. But they are worth it for that price. You run STRAIGHT Methanol through his pump (best cooling effect). No oil additive or anything. If you cannot find meth, you can even use denatured alcohol off the shelf of a hardware store (expensive, but good in a pinch, also little harsher on the pump). I put the kit in myself in only a couple hours (17 year old mechanic here). Somebody on here is using it in their 580HP procharged LS1 on a stock short block.

Nix
that would be me ...alky control i run 100% meth and im on bone stock motor .....575 rwhp 535 #ft tq
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 07:59 PM
  #26  
ZNix's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 193
Likes: 30
From: Plympton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I agree 100% with you. On a motor built to see boost, the rings and bearings have tolerances designed to handle the higher heat seen from a forced induction setup, so running 100% methanol is fine. But on a stock ls1, with rings gapped as tight as 0.009" (mine were between 0.010 and 0.012") high heat from forced induction is a recipe for disaster. The water helps to keep the chamber temps a little friendlier.
I understand now. Makes sense. The people who put the 4.8 on boost and hit 1200 HP widened the gap for that reason I assume. Thanks for schooling me.

Nix
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #27  
ZNix's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 193
Likes: 30
From: Plympton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by 02gangsta/ss
that would be me ...alky control i run 100% meth and im on bone stock motor .....575 rwhp 535 #ft tq
Yes it was you haha.

Nix
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 06:06 PM
  #28  
tbss23sfv's Avatar
Teching In
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

so would a 50/50 mix be the best or would something like a 75/25 be better im looking to make the most power but the longevity of my stock short block is more important

and will this help making more power above 600 since i guess that's the reason most stock motors let go
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 08:55 PM
  #29  
35thsscamaro02's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: saint louis Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by tbss23sfv
so would a 50/50 mix be the best or would something like a 75/25 be better im looking to make the most power but the longevity of my stock short block is more important

and will this help making more power above 600 since i guess that's the reason most stock motors let go

I run 75/25 meth/water by volume. Stock short block beat the **** out of it daily since December. I run two 10gph nozzles.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 09:35 PM
  #30  
I8UR4RD's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 2
From: Bama
Default

alky control kit here, but soon ill be running e85 so it should not matter. ill have a seperate 93 octane tune that i will activate the methanol 49/51 (boost juice) in the event i want to drive out of town and cant find any E and still be able to have some fun without fear of temps. IMO the aquamist sounds like the way to go these days per alchemists lessons and research.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.