Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

LS9 cam not good with turbos???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 07:48 PM
  #1  
quik67's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine,TX
Default LS9 cam not good with turbos???

Seems I have heard more negative reviews with the LS9 cam and turbos. I am looking for something for my 5.3 that will have good low to mid range torque and pull like hell up top. Would the GT2-3 be a better option or TU1?
Or should I just go with a LS6 cam and be done.
Which of these would most likely produce more torque out of boost?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 08:18 PM
  #2  
a4ls2goat's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Default

I'm using the ls9 cam on my 70mm, 5.3 setup. Works perfect. Pulls hard all the way to 6500rpm and wants to keep pulling.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
WheelsUp84z's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 4
From: Concord, NC
Default

not bad for a $95 cam new from GMpartsdirect
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 09:26 PM
  #4  
1sick-Z's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: In front of Mustangs
Default

It works. Definatley best cam for the $$$
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 10:01 PM
  #5  
a-low's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Kalifornia
Default

It may be 95 $ but factor in the cost of the front cover and i think cam gear is different?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 07:10 AM
  #6  
turbocamaro125's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 5
From: Warfordsburg PA
Default

buddy has 4.8 s472 t6 turbo with ls1 intake and ls9 cam and it spools at 2600 and runs great for 12.5 psi........new cam is like maybe 20 bucks. I got him a ls9 cam and gear for $124 with tax lol
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 07:15 AM
  #7  
denmah's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 31
Default

its working pretty damn good in a bunch of our 10 second 4.8 setups
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 03:24 PM
  #8  
WheelsUp84z's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 4
From: Concord, NC
Default

Originally Posted by turbocamaro125
buddy has 4.8 s472 t6 turbo with ls1 intake and ls9 cam and it spools at 2600 and runs great for 12.5 psi........new cam is like maybe 20 bucks. I got him a ls9 cam and gear for $124 with tax lol
i'd like to know where you got a new cam for 20 bucks. 95 is the cheapest I've found it, i've seen it as much as 160.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 04:29 PM
  #9  
HRHohio's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 916
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Horrible cam... I have like NO TRACTION anymore! Damn!



So bad, Lingenfelter discontinued one of their cams.

"This is the GM factory 2009-2012 LS9 ZR1 camshaft that works excellent in many supercharged or turbocharged applications. The LS9 camshaft is 211/230 @.050 valve lift and .558/.552 lift with 1.7 rockers and a 122.5 centerline.

Before the LS9 was introduced LPE used the GT7 camshaft that John Lingenfelter designed in 2001 to be the perfect camshaft for boosted LSx applications. The GT7 was 208/230 @.050 valve lift and .554/.546 and 121 center line this camshaft produced excellent power and still had great street driveablity. In 2009 GM introduced the LS9 in the C6 ZR1 supercharged Corvette engine. After comparing specifications on the camshaft and finding out how economical this is due to it being mass produced Lingenfelter discontinued the GT7 and started using the LS9 in supercharged or turbocharged applications.

The LS9 camshaft is a 3 bolt design and will use the Lingenfelter 3 bolt cam conversion kit if you are installing it in a single bolt application like the 2007 – 2010 LS2 or LS3. If you are installing it in an earlier LS1 or LS6 engine with the cam sensor at the back of the engine you will need a 2005 LS2 front cover, 2005 1x cam sprocket, camshaft extension harness, 2005 LS2 chain dampner."

http://www.lingenfelter.com/mm5/merc...w=&range_high=

Last edited by HRHohio; Jul 18, 2012 at 04:35 PM. Reason: Added Lingenfelter info
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 05:06 PM
  #10  
quik67's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine,TX
Default

Ok guys Im convinced !
I will go with the LS9.
Thanks for all the replys.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 05:54 PM
  #11  
HRHohio's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 916
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

It is a good budget turbo cam... you won't be upset... easilly 50 hp more than a stock cam will get you, overall.

Don't get me wrong... if you were doing competitive racing, you might think about having someone professionally spec a cam for your exact setup. But for what it sounds like you're shooting for, great cam.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 06:55 PM
  #12  
2baditsnotachev's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

How does it compare to the ls6 cam though?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 09:10 PM
  #13  
turbocamaro125's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 5
From: Warfordsburg PA
Default

Cam gear sorry
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 10:27 PM
  #14  
HRHohio's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 916
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by 2baditsnotachev
How does it compare to the ls6 cam though?
Better than the LS6.


Here are some Cam Specs:

LS6 Cam (’01): 204/211 @ 0.050; 0.525/0.525; 116 LSA
LS6 Cam (’02+): 204/218 @ 0.050; 0.555/0.551; 117.5 LSA

LS9 Cam ---->: 211/230 @ 0.050; 0.562/0.558; 122.5 LSA

Interestingly the LS7 Cam is VERY similar to the LS9 Cam but has a tighter LSA and a little more lift:

LS7 Cam---->: 211/230 @ 0.050; 0.591/0.591; 120.5

I'm thinking that the tighter LSA on the LS7 cam will help with the low end (not in boost) torque and be a bit more aggressive down low.


http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...n/viewall.html


Just my thoughts...

Note: The GT7 camshaft by Lingenfelter had a 121 LSA, but a little less lift.


.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 07:21 AM
  #15  
Stangkilr's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,937
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, Mo
Default

LS9 cam is working awesome on my setup.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 08:53 AM
  #16  
HRHohio's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 916
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by Stangkilr
LS9 cam is working awesome on my setup.
Nice! That picture in your sig says it all!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 10:51 AM
  #17  
ramairetransam's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 75
From: Amsterdam Ny, the good part
Default

how it do with a procharger p1 on an ls1 ? sorry to ask turbo guys . and hijack
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 11:09 AM
  #18  
Stangkilr's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,937
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, Mo
Default

Its a good boost cam period for the money. Its got a stock sounding idle though. If you want a small cam with a Pro-Charger just do like a 224 cam or something.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 12:39 PM
  #19  
94'BLKBRD's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by HRHohio
Nice! That picture in your sig says it all!
I think the sig pic was with his NA/Nitrous setup, I may be wrong though.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 01:16 PM
  #20  
Stangkilr's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,937
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, Mo
Default

Originally Posted by 94'BLKBRD
I think the sig pic was with his NA/Nitrous setup, I may be wrong though.
Yeah it was. Its faster now though.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.