Would this gt91 setup work good with my 402LS
GT-91
1475 (141lbs/min)
3RD-94mm
1.08 T6
On my 402LS in a 70 nova E85,10.7 compression,325 gear.28"tire,3500 stall
Will i have lag ?
Last edited by 70ls1chevelle; Mar 21, 2013 at 06:27 PM.
Id rather see you in a full GT55 sized turbine at 112mm.
What exactly do you mean,im new to this turbo language.What is a full GT55 ? And the turbine itself is 112mm ?
Nitrous is alot easier LOL
Trending Topics
this big mama jama
http://store.evans-tuning.com/garret...ing-turbo.html
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Id rather see you in a full GT55 sized turbine at 112mm.
What exactly do you mean,im new to this turbo language.What is a full GT55 ? And the turbine itself is 112mm ?
Nitrous is alot easier LOL
Talk to dudeman.. he switched from a gt91 to an S500 that has the same wheel dimensions as the gT5518..
Hes a stock shortblock 6.0.... and your a 402 with damn near 11:1 compression on E85......
You are gonna need the 112mm turbine... trust me on that.
At the very least... id be looking at the GT5088 instead of the GT91... its got a 104mm turbine iirc.
We havent really done any back to backing with different sized turbines. Since Ive became involved in what Joses doing at FI all hes done is proof of concept dynos on all the new compressor wheels hes been bringing to market.
The billet wheels help im sure. On the new Billet 80 for the S400... that wheel is 50 grams lighter than the cast wheel... pretty drastic difference.
Last edited by LilJohn; Mar 22, 2013 at 09:45 AM.
Actually made 35 more rear wheel horsepower than the uber expensive garrett GTX5533 it was back to backed against. The only down side is that it was 150 rpm behind on the boost curve. Thing is.. without instrumentation like a datalogger or dyno... i doubt anybodys assometer could ever tell the difference.
1-2 grand cheaper and makes more power... Pretty damn good i think.
Actually made 35 more rear wheel horsepower than the uber expensive garrett GTX5533 it was back to backed against. The only down side is that it was 150 rpm behind on the boost curve. Thing is.. without instrumentation like a datalogger or dyno... i doubt anybodys assometer could ever tell the difference.
1-2 grand cheaper and makes more power... Pretty damn good i think.
Going to be getting ahold of you once this lil engine pops for my big engine cam specs






