Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

***LMR 2013 GT500 makes 1106rwhp!!!***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2013, 07:14 AM
  #21  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Late Model Racecraft
We have not made any pulls on pump gas. The customer bought a 55gal drum of MS109 for driving it around. Car probably wont ever see pump gas to be honest.
Any ideas what the power would have been on 93 octane pump? do you think it would have made over 1000rwhp?
Old 04-25-2013, 07:37 AM
  #22  
Closed ex-Sponsor Account
Thread Starter
 
Late Model Racecraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
Any ideas what the power would have been on 93 octane pump? do you think it would have made over 1000rwhp?
I think it would have been very close.
Old 04-25-2013, 05:40 PM
  #23  
TECH Resident
 
ayousef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dubai
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Late Model Racecraft
We didnt have the spark lead hooked up due to having to remove the cover of the valve cover that holds down the coil on plug setup. we didnt want them to be able to come lose during the pull. No spark lead = no torque number. The car makes 25psi of boost by 2800rpm. Use your imagination for the torque graph.
Originally Posted by LILHEMI
this is a pretty ****** funny response actually.
I hate to be rude but not hooking up the rpm signal is a trick to make a estimated 10% higher HP reading on a Dynojet, just saying
Old 04-25-2013, 06:23 PM
  #24  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ayousef
I hate to be rude but not hooking up the rpm signal is a trick to make a estimated 10% higher HP reading on a Dynojet, just saying

Ok, so it makes 1000rwhp. Still pretty badass.
Old 04-26-2013, 05:58 PM
  #25  
TECH Resident
 
ayousef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dubai
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
Ok, so it makes 1000rwhp. Still pretty badass.
no doubt, I wanted to know if the blower is maxed out because the other member that has a 4.0 seems to have maxed it out at about 1000rwhp too but made much more torque. The 4.0 is rated at 2500CFM and im wondering why no one is making 1000+ from it?

FYI 2500CFM is what an F2 Procharger flows, not sure if the Whipple's flow is over-rated?
Old 05-01-2013, 07:39 AM
  #26  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ayousef
no doubt, I wanted to know if the blower is maxed out because the other member that has a 4.0 seems to have maxed it out at about 1000rwhp too but made much more torque. The 4.0 is rated at 2500CFM and im wondering why no one is making 1000+ from it?

FYI 2500CFM is what an F2 Procharger flows, not sure if the Whipple's flow is over-rated?
Yeah thats what im thinking! they seemt o be making nowhere near what the prochargers can! The blower cant be consuming 300bhp+ worth of power (can it?). I think there has to be some 'other' issues. Would like to see how a remote mounted Whipple 4.0 would get on with a 2000bhp + charge coolers and a good intake manifold (these are all the things that the current setups DONT have)!



Quick Reply: ***LMR 2013 GT500 makes 1106rwhp!!!***



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.