LS9 head gaskets..... why....
An LS9 head gasket on a 5.3 leaves you with a .051" gap between the block and the head that is .095" wide all the way around the bore (compared to a properly sized 3.910 bore gasket). This is simply not ideal regardless of whether it works or not.
The GM 3.910 bore MLS gaskets are good for decent boost and power. When exceeding what they are good for it's best to step up to a properly sized Cometic.
We've seen ZERO issues running the ls9 gaskets on a lot of setups, a lot of miles, and 30+ lbs of boost. For anyone wanting sub 1300rwhp, I don't see a reason(unless the bore of the motor is too big) to not run the ls9 gaskets in a boost application. They are cheap, they work(proven MANY times), and so far nobody has any hard facts/proof of any issues caused by running them.
We've seen ZERO issues running the ls9 gaskets on a lot of setups, a lot of miles, and 30+ lbs of boost. For anyone wanting sub 1300rwhp, I don't see a reason(unless the bore of the motor is too big) to not run the ls9 gaskets in a boost application. They are cheap, they work(proven MANY times), and so far nobody has any hard facts/proof of any issues caused by running them.
I've plainly explained the gap it leaves between the head and deck of the block and this IS NOT RIGHT. I don't care how many people have done it without known issues, that doesn't make it acceptable to keep recommending it to people who want to do things right. You're cramming air/fuel mixture into that gap under boost and either leaving unburnt air/fuel mixture in the gap after combustion, or you have combustion happening between the head and deck. Either way it shouldn't be considered acceptable. Ideally you want to burn all of your air/fuel mixture and you want to do so in the combustion chamber.
I've said all I can say to try to inform the masses on this subject and giving information is really my only goal here, not to get into an argument. You can take it or leave it, it's just an opinion. I would never put an engine together intended for 20+psi and not put the right head gasket on it for the application and I recommend that you guys consider the same.
Consider your goals, consider the information given, and run whatever you choose with confidence

800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
I've plainly explained the gap it leaves between the head and deck of the block and this IS NOT RIGHT. I don't care how many people have done it without known issues, that doesn't make it acceptable to keep recommending it to people who want to do things right. You're cramming air/fuel mixture into that gap under boost and either leaving unburnt air/fuel mixture in the gap after combustion, or you have combustion happening between the head and deck. Either way it shouldn't be considered acceptable. Ideally you want to burn all of your air/fuel mixture and you want to do so in the combustion chamber.
I've said all I can say to try to inform the masses on this subject and giving information is really my only goal here, not to get into an argument. You can take it or leave it, it's just an opinion. I would never put an engine together intended for 20+psi and not put the right head gasket on it for the application and I recommend that you guys consider the same.
Consider your goals, consider the information given, and run whatever you choose with confidence

Can you show me ONE car it caused a real issue running the ls9 gasket on a small bore motor?
Is it most ideal, no....but it does work, it causes no problems, and the ls9 gaskets have been proven to not leak with more boost than the ones with less layers, thus making them a great option.
Can you show me ONE car it caused a real issue running the ls9 gasket on a small bore motor?
Is it most ideal, no....but it does work, it causes no problems, and the ls9 gaskets have been proven to not leak with more boost than the ones with less layers, thus making them a great option.

800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice

800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
looked all over, must have missed em! Thanx Scoggy!!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
ls9 might be worthwhile on the huge end,
i just went 135 in my latest fairmont build on paper headgaskets on a stock 4.8l motor and stock TTY bolts
I pinged 30+lbs on my 4.8 on a few times running LS9 gaskets. Never saw a drop of coolant.
I noticed on my alum 5.3 the fire ring on the LS9 gasket sits well outside the steel cylinder sleeve. I blew the LS9 gasket out on that motor. (more than likely due to tuning issues on my part i'm sure)
I pinged 30+lbs on my 4.8 on a few times running LS9 gaskets. Never saw a drop of coolant.
I noticed on my alum 5.3 the fire ring on the LS9 gasket sits well outside the steel cylinder sleeve. I blew the LS9 gasket out on that motor. (more than likely due to tuning issues on my part i'm sure)
Until now. I used the Felpros on my iron 5.3 at 28lbs and had it push water. Timing was "up there" at 18 degrees since it should be a pretty efficient combo with the TFS heads, good intake, sizeable turbos etc. I replaced with LS9's and went back at it with 16 degrees timing and 30lbs of boost. So far so good with plenty of track passes. The dilemma is now I want to put the aluminum block back in to save 85lbs but the fire ring outside the bore scares me. Guess I'll go check out those 5 layer 5.3 gaskets LilJohn is making.
Hope this helps.
Hope this helps.











