cant afr error histogram be used when injecting meth?
My comand and actual are very close as the car was professionally tuned before. When I add the Meth it obviously goes rich.
Do I just forget the error histogram and just get my afr correct by adjusting pe? Any advantage to adjusting ve instead?
How can I get my normal afr histogram fill in all cells?
Does any one know how to make The afr histogram or any histogram populate all cells?
Actual afr divided by comand afr (14.7/pe enrichement multiplier) multiplied by number currently in ve table for that rpm&kpa equals new ve value.
Is that correct for tuning ve?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Last edited by DropShipDave; Sep 3, 2013 at 10:32 PM.
So if I.know ve is set right for the setup why not just reduce wot in pe by taking away a % of fuel? In my mind it just seems like 2 ways to get to the same result. Why would hpt say right in the pe table that its used for wot fueling if its done in ve?
So if I.know ve is set right for the setup why not just reduce wot in pe by taking away a % of fuel? In my mind it just seems like 2 ways to get to the same result. Why would hpt say right in the pe table that its used for wot fueling if its done in ve?
I cleaned up my VE table out of WOT. I use a progressive alky injection system that I set per recommendation (ramp up, etc) Then made WOT runs easing the PE leaner each run (started rich of course) until AFR was where I wanted it. It is dead on every time I log a run, so if it's not the correct way, it sure works pretty good.

Do whatever you're comfortable with and understand.





