Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Trust MAP or boost gauge when looking for pressure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2013, 03:12 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
jasonz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I bought the 2 bar SD just not 100% sure if its correct on the tune. Im waiting on a call back from the tuner to talk about all this. If the tune is all good would it be worth just trying another MAP?
Old 10-15-2013, 05:00 PM
  #22  
Man-Crush Warning
iTrader: (1)
 
Shownomercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,157
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Pull the MAP off and see if giving it a regulated air source corresponds with what the PCM is seeing.

Blue 48 is 5v to MAP
Blue 54 is GND for MAP
Red 32 is the signal for MAP
Old 10-15-2013, 05:23 PM
  #23  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jasonz28camaro
I went to the dyno yesterday and the tuner said the map sensor was only showing 7lbs on the laptop. My autometer gauge says 14lbs though and has ever sense I installed the SC. The gauge is hooked up directly to the intake manifold and with my pulleys / engine mods it should be right at 14lbs.

I'm real curious to see what number is right, the car is making 600HP. I was expecting a little more with 14lbs. I know its just an LT1 but I was lookig for around 650-700, what do you guys think?

Another consideration was the IAT was high... 165. I'm not running meth just yet (next step of the project) and the intercooler is a little small. Not sure if the intercooler is restricting the air because the gauge says its still 14lbs after it, sure is heating it up though. The intercooler looks like the vertical procharger 2 core with the 3" inlet and outlets on the same side, bought is used and might be a knockoff.

The next step is to get a bigger A2a intercooler with some meth to help with the IAT. Is there anything I can do at he moment to determine whats what?

Thanks guys.
Naturally you would ensure all sensors are calibrated correctly before carrying out any tuning work.

I guess this wasnt done ?
Old 10-15-2013, 07:11 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
jasonz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I spoke to the tuner and he assured me that the map was performing correctly on his computer and it is the 2 bar tune and all. Tomorrow I'll check the Kpa again on another scanner. He told me to go buy another boost gauge and see what it does so I did and its the same as my current one. So at least this narrows it down completely to the MAP. The tuner said the map could just be bad and next time I see him I'll bring a new one. At this point the tune is dead on either way, might be able to tweak something a little more with a proper MAP though.

I pulled the map off and it read 306 again on the Kpa with the motor off, when I turned it on it showed 177 to 180 it was not installed at this time. I didnt check it when the car was running though.
Old 10-16-2013, 02:32 AM
  #25  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Can you detail exactly what you mean by map and MAP ?

"map" would suggest the tune file on the ecu
"MAP" is Manifold Absolute Pressure" ie a pressure reading, not a physical component as you seem to be implying.
MAP Sensor is the actual sensor.

He does not have your map sensor and wiring installed on his computer, so to say a map is working correctly in that context is just nonsense.

Key on, engine off the MAP sensor reading should be circa 100kpa. ie atmospheric. This may fluctuate very slightly depending on weather etc.
Obviously you can only take readings when the sensor is wired/connected to the ecu and the ecu is live.

Given there is clearly doubt about either the scaling of the sensor, the wiring or indeed the actual tuning map. To continue running the car hard because you feel it is "dead on" is rather dangerous.
Until you have physically proven the sensor is working correctly. ie outputs a linear voltage with respect to pressure applied to it, and is consistent in doing so. You risk engine damage by continuing to drive.

You must do this to ensure the sensor is not faulty, or indeed you dont have a wiring fault.

It all goes back to simple basic checks before tuning. If your MAP sensor was not reading circa 100kpa at key on, engine off, no tuning should ever even have taken place until it was resolved.
Likewise at idle, camshaft dependant of course, you'd expect it to be in the 35-65kpa region. Any deviation from either of those should be ringing alarm bells
Old 10-16-2013, 03:02 AM
  #26  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Tirefire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: El Paso, Tx
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

306 -100=206

206 x .145=29.87 lbs. of boost i would say there is something wrong with this!?

Anything up to 100 kpa is vacuum anything after is boost. You multiple anything above 100 by .145.
Old 10-16-2013, 07:43 AM
  #27  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Likewise at idle, camshaft dependant of course, you'd expect it to be in the 35-65kpa region. Any deviation from either of those should be ringing alarm bells
not always true.....
totally dependent on a lot of factors...
my car idles at 75kpa.......its a BIG cam....I dont worry...it doesnt ring alarm bells..LOL
Old 10-16-2013, 08:10 AM
  #28  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soundengineer
not always true.....
totally dependent on a lot of factors...
my car idles at 75kpa.......its a BIG cam....I dont worry...it doesnt ring alarm bells..LOL

100% true. I did clearly say dependant on camshaft. And again, you know the vacuum it is pulling. It will still be circa 100kpa at key on, engine off.

Clearly the OP's in this case is miles off, and the car should never have been tuned like that unless you were 100% happy doing so knowing a sensor is reading/calibrated wrong.
Old 10-16-2013, 08:38 AM
  #29  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

And again not always true because if you go above sea level the value at key on will change
At 5000 feet above sea level.....its gonna read 85kpa at key on...
Old 10-16-2013, 08:45 AM
  #30  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soundengineer
And again not always true because if you go above sea level the value at key on will change
At 5000 feet above sea level.....its gonna read 85kpa at key on...
The OP hasnt mentioned he is at that altitude.
Old 10-16-2013, 10:38 AM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
jasonz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Can you detail exactly what you mean by map and MAP ?

"map" would suggest the tune file on the ecu
"MAP" is Manifold Absolute Pressure" ie a pressure reading, not a physical component as you seem to be implying.
MAP Sensor is the actual sensor.

He does not have your map sensor and wiring installed on his computer, so to say a map is working correctly in that context is just nonsense.

Key on, engine off the MAP sensor reading should be circa 100kpa. ie atmospheric. This may fluctuate very slightly depending on weather etc.
Obviously you can only take readings when the sensor is wired/connected to the ecu and the ecu is live.

Given there is clearly doubt about either the scaling of the sensor, the wiring or indeed the actual tuning map. To continue running the car hard because you feel it is "dead on" is rather dangerous.
Until you have physically proven the sensor is working correctly. ie outputs a linear voltage with respect to pressure applied to it, and is consistent in doing so. You risk engine damage by continuing to drive.

You must do this to ensure the sensor is not faulty, or indeed you dont have a wiring fault.

It all goes back to simple basic checks before tuning. If your MAP sensor was not reading circa 100kpa at key on, engine off, no tuning should ever even have taken place until it was resolved.
Likewise at idle, camshaft dependant of course, you'd expect it to be in the 35-65kpa region. Any deviation from either of those should be ringing alarm bells
Any time I have said MAP or map I mean MAP Sensor.

Like I said though, I will need to get it on another scanner, my tuner said the MAP sensor was reading correctly before, durring and after the tuning session. It was just strange that it only picked up 7lbs.

I'm going to order a new GM 2 Bar MAP sensor today and go put the car on a new scanner to check out the Kpa again and when the new sensor comes in I'll do the same. All of the wiring looks good so I'll get back to you guys after I put it on the other scanner.
Old 10-16-2013, 11:21 AM
  #32  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

How can your tuner say it is working correctly, when you are clearly saying it is only displaying half of actual boost pressure ?

It either reads right or it doesnt.

Or are you saying it is something that has developed after tuning ? If so. It is definitely dangerous to be driving the engine under load
Old 10-16-2013, 12:24 PM
  #33  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,778
Received 303 Likes on 203 Posts

Default

This is an LT1 with an LT1 computer correct?
Old 10-16-2013, 03:47 PM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
jasonz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

He didn't say it was perfect but the A/F ratio was correct when being tuned. Whether it showed 7lbs or 15lbs it doesn't matter so to say as long as everything else is in working condition... leaves some room for error probably but its kind of like saying 1/4 or 2/8, two different numbers but you get the same results (my words not his). When I go back to see him in the near future we will defiantly get to the bottom of this though.

It is a LT1 car with a 02 PCM.

BTW I did check the Kpa on another scanner and it showed everything normal, the other scanner was showing bogus readings. It showed 101 with the key on so who know whats wrong?
Old 10-16-2013, 05:49 PM
  #35  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

You need to be reading the MAP sensor reading via whatever tuning software was used. If it is correct there, then that is all that matters.

101kpa with key on engine off ( at sea level or close to it ) is perfectly normal.
Old 10-16-2013, 06:15 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If you posted the tune we could check
Old 10-17-2013, 09:43 AM
  #37  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,778
Received 303 Likes on 203 Posts

Default

Ahh OK, I didn't see the 24x in the signature. If it was tuned with HP Tuners you need to use HP Tuners scanner to verify the MAP pid. Also post up and verify the part # for the 2 bar sensor. Hell posting the tune would eliminate a lot of variables.

Last edited by NicD; 10-17-2013 at 10:17 AM.
Old 10-17-2013, 01:07 PM
  #38  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
jasonz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Here is the tune from my visit prior to this one, nothing has changed except the A/F and a little timing. I'll ask him for this most recent one and post that too, maybe this one has something you can look at.
Attached Files
File Type: hpt
v13.hpt (468.4 KB, 54 views)
Old 10-17-2013, 02:19 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
jasonz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Here is the PN
Old 10-17-2013, 02:33 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

There is a lot Id change in that tune.

Your tuner needs to change the injector bank select since the computer still thinks it has the LS1 assignment (bet you have split fuel trims if your tuner had CL on, probably why he turned it to OL to mask the problem)

WOT is commanded AFR at 12.1, I think it would help to be a little richer, plus the VE table doesn't look right IMO.

Like you mentioned this is not the updated tune, but I would for sure have more timing in it. At the moment its not even referencing the high octane tables so timing is be reverted to the "drive" spark table.

Your Map sensor Offset and linear values appear to be right for a standard 2 bar Map sensor and I crossed referenced that part number and it appears to be a 2 bar map

Just to make sure its going into SD, Id uncheck the MAF boxes in DTC's, set the MAF fail to 0 Hz, 0 out the MAF chart (all but the first few Hz cells), and set high RPM disable to 12,000 instead of 4,000

Are you running a return fuel system or not?? IFR says you have a Boost referenced Regulator (1 to 1) but your offset tables says you don't.

Trans settings can't be right for your gearing/tire size/ and WOT RPM, bet it shifts super early in WOT

Last edited by T/A KID; 10-17-2013 at 02:47 PM.


Quick Reply: Trust MAP or boost gauge when looking for pressure?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.