Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

How much power before e85/meth needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2013, 07:21 AM
  #21  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
samdogmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alton, IL
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

the thing with running the higher base psi is you have to have a damn good pump & regulator. But if you want to running higher pressures you can get away with less injector.

On my car I just went ahead & bought 120# injectors, they only see about 70-75% DC on E85 with a 50psi base 22 pounds of boost.
Old 12-22-2013, 11:55 AM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
LT1RAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Let's throw some math to all of this.

80lb/hr injectors x 8 injectors = 640lb/hr
640lb/hr / .65bsfc (gas) = 985 crankshaft hp
E85 requires about 30% more fuel
640lb/hr / .845bsfc (E85) = 757 crankshaft hp

Now these injectors (deka 80's) are rated at 3 bar, so at 4 bar they flow around 92lbs.

92lb/hr injectors x 8 injectors = 736lb/hr
736lb/hr / .65bsfc (gas) = 1132 crankshaft hp
E85 requires about 30% more fuel
736lb/hr / .845bsfc (E85) = 871 crankshaft hp
Old 12-22-2013, 12:47 PM
  #23  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,971
Received 734 Likes on 539 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1RAY
Let's throw some math to all of this.

80lb/hr injectors x 8 injectors = 640lb/hr
640lb/hr / .65bsfc (gas) = 985 crankshaft hp
E85 requires about 30% more fuel
640lb/hr / .845bsfc (E85) = 757 crankshaft hp

Now these injectors (deka 80's) are rated at 3 bar, so at 4 bar they flow around 92lbs.

92lb/hr injectors x 8 injectors = 736lb/hr
736lb/hr / .65bsfc (gas) = 1132 crankshaft hp
E85 requires about 30% more fuel
736lb/hr / .845bsfc (E85) = 871 crankshaft hp
Those are good rough estimates when planning to purchase injectors. Though the hi-Z 80# injectors claim 80lbs at 42 psi. (3 bar would be 44psi). I'm all for larger injectors if you can afford them. Hard to get a hi-z above 80# for under $400 though. And many use the OEM ECU so low-z aren't really an affordable option. I'm not saying it's for everyone, just that it's an option. I run Low-z 120's on an aftermarket ECU so I don't have to run a massive amount of pump.

It's been proven through real world testing though that the Hi-Z 80's can make much more than 871 crank hp. Both by a dyno and by weight VS trap speed. Of course this was also done above the suggested 80% DC of the injectors. I've gone in the upper 90's and even static on injectors time and time again and never had a hiccup.

Going by weight and trap speed he was making 930ish WHP. Thats 3 intank 255's -10 to the regulator, -6 to the OEM fuel rail. You can argue numbers on paper all day long. The fact is, it's been done.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 12-22-2013 at 12:54 PM.
Old 12-22-2013, 02:07 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HexenLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yes skinnies made much more power on E85. He was also pushing 6 bars of fuel pressure.
Old 12-22-2013, 02:58 PM
  #25  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,971
Received 734 Likes on 539 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HexenLord
Yes skinnies made much more power on E85. He was also pushing 6 bars of fuel pressure.
No... the injectors only see 4.6 bar. The rest is cancelled out with manifold pressure and the rising rate FPR.

According to the calculator I used the 80's flow like a 101lb injector at 68psi. Or about 1050cc.

8 777cc injectors
.55 BSFC (.65 seems a bit over shot if you ask me)
99% DC

can make 1075 FWHP

777cc X 30% for E85 = 1010cc

http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php

Last edited by Forcefed86; 12-22-2013 at 03:15 PM.
Old 12-23-2013, 12:40 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
nxfirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: topeka, ks
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dmaxvaz
Really? i have a 390ci, s480, 1000cc injectors, and made 801 rwhp @ 90% dc. i have the holley dominator 2-1800 dual pumps, -10 feed, -8 return on e85. 80s will not support that hp rating. please stop posting rediculous #s on e85.
you must be new at this game!
stock lines, rails, with 80's and 3 - 255's have made 800 plus on about a half a dozen combos around here.

if your on e85 and I were you i'd be turning my base pressure up to about 60 lbs and see what it will do.
Old 12-24-2013, 09:48 AM
  #27  
Launching!
 
1BadAsZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Florence, MS
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HexenLord
The limit of pump gas isn't dictated by horsepower or boost, but how well the heat is kept in check. A 1.6L Honda would see knock at 120 HP with 13:1 and stock cams on 91. A 572 at 7.5:1 compression and a pair of billet 88s would make it above 1500 before it seen knock on pump gas.

There are tons of ways to keep temps low. Low compression, less timing, water or meth injection, bigger intercooler, free-flowing exhaust (less back pressure), larger turbine housings, lower degree thermostat, colder heat range plugs, nitrous, blah blah blah.
On a 5.3 (iron 347) would 8.5-8.8 be too low to drive around on in order to be able to run pump gas? Or should I keep compression around 9.1+ and just run race gas on track days
Old 12-24-2013, 09:56 AM
  #28  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,971
Received 734 Likes on 539 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1BadAsZ
On a 5.3 (iron 347) would 8.5-8.8 be too low to drive around on in order to be able to run pump gas? Or should I keep compression around 9.1+ and just run race gas on track days
No. I drove my 7:8:1 Gen1 383 SBC (iron headed, mild cam... nothing fancy) on the street in a 4000lb Gbody It still went 13.6 NA. (On 87 octane!) My gen3 5.3 was 8.6:1 and it drove great as well. Don't be afraid of lower compression.
Old 12-24-2013, 01:42 PM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HexenLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1BadAsZ
On a 5.3 (iron 347) would 8.5-8.8 be too low to drive around on in order to be able to run pump gas? Or should I keep compression around 9.1+ and just run race gas on track days
Most factory boosted cars are in the 8:1-8.6:1 range. My old SRT4 was 8:1. If a 4 cylinder can be driven just fine out of boost at 8:1, a V8 won't even sweat it. At best you'll be down 15-20 HP with a one point drop.
Old 12-24-2013, 02:09 PM
  #30  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

I'd say anyone would seriously struggle to tell the difference in a slightly lower CR, especially if it's an auto where the box would mask a lot of things.
Old 12-26-2013, 06:52 AM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I've also been 159mph on street tires(mud and snow tires, not drag radials) in my mustang at 3340lbs(aluminum motor in it then) with 80lb injectors. We ran right at 100lbs of fuel pressure at wot with no issues.

We've also done quite a few other cars, have LOTS of street miles with 80lb siemen injectors and 800+ rwhp on e85 and no issues with them.

Sadly 99% of people never push a fuel system, they just read what someone on the internet told them they can't do, or listen to their "tuner or shop" who has never done it. Too many "experts" without any hands on experience anymore thanks to the internet.
Old 12-26-2013, 07:31 AM
  #32  
Man-Crush Warning
iTrader: (1)
 
Shownomercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,162
Received 121 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Same turbo here, Gen 2 motor, and only 10psi with no meth etc

Off trap/weight should be mid 700hp, but thats moot since its an auto, point is, lower CR (mine is mid 9s) and 80# injectors on a 60psi base work fine.

I have a magnafuel big *** noisy external but it works.
Old 12-26-2013, 01:07 PM
  #33  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
fly boy_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by skinnies
I've also been 159mph on street tires(mud and snow tires, not drag radials) in my mustang at 3340lbs(aluminum motor in it then) with 80lb injectors. We ran right at 100lbs of fuel pressure at wot with no issues.

We've also done quite a few other cars, have LOTS of street miles with 80lb siemen injectors and 800+ rwhp on e85 and no issues with them.

Sadly 99% of people never push a fuel system, they just read what someone on the internet told them they can't do, or listen to their "tuner or shop" who has never done it. Too many "experts" without any hands on experience anymore thanks to the internet.
Thanks for commenting, cars like yours are inspiring. So Stick with some 80lb injectors, what fuel pump/s do you prefer out of everything you've tried? I was planning on dual aeromotive 340's will those run that amount of pressure? I also have an aeromotive A1000 regulator for -6 lines, are you running the regulator before fuel sees the rails, or after? Stock rails as well?
Old 12-26-2013, 01:38 PM
  #34  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I've ran stock rails in my rx7 without an issue, in my mustang I have a pro flo intake so I have aftermarket rails. Both I use the Mallory 4305M regulator, with stock rails we always run the regulator just before the rails.

I have ran triple walbro 255 pumps before at 90+ lbs pressure at wot, now I prefer the bosch 044 pumps.

Everyone gets afraid of going over 80% duty cycle, that is just a calculated number. It's not like it stops adding fuel at 100% duty cycle. Also we have NEVER had an issue running 100% duty cycle with the 80lb injectors, many many miles on them and never a problem.
Old 12-26-2013, 01:50 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
AutomagicLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shawnee,KS
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by skinnies
I've ran stock rails in my rx7 without an issue, in my mustang I have a pro flo intake so I have aftermarket rails. Both I use the Mallory 4305M regulator, with stock rails we always run the regulator just before the rails.

I have ran triple walbro 255 pumps before at 90+ lbs pressure at wot, now I prefer the bosch 044 pumps.

Everyone gets afraid of going over 80% duty cycle, that is just a calculated number. It's not like it stops adding fuel at 100% duty cycle. Also we have NEVER had an issue running 100% duty cycle with the 80lb injectors, many many miles on them and never a problem.
iirc hasn't maxx pushed the 80's on e85 to 130% idc where it stops reading in hp tuners and it hadn't leaned out yet or just started to? i remember we had my 160's @ 118% @ hob
Old 12-26-2013, 01:57 PM
  #36  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AutomagicLS1
iirc hasn't maxx pushed the 80's on e85 to 130% idc where it stops reading in hp tuners and it hadn't leaned out yet or just started to? i remember we had my 160's @ 118% @ hob
140-145% duty cycle is when it can't add anymore fuel
Old 12-29-2013, 07:49 AM
  #37  
Launching!
 
1BadAsZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Florence, MS
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
No. I drove my 7:8:1 Gen1 383 SBC (iron headed, mild cam... nothing fancy) on the street in a 4000lb Gbody It still went 13.6 NA. (On 87 octane!) My gen3 5.3 was 8.6:1 and it drove great as well. Don't be afraid of lower compression.
Were either one of them boosted? If so was it on 93 or e85? And if so what kind of power/times was it turning
Old 12-29-2013, 12:07 PM
  #38  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,971
Received 734 Likes on 539 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1BadAsZ
Were either one of them boosted? If so was it on 93 or e85? And if so what kind of power/times was it turning
The 383 had a blower on it and ran pump gas. It was a low 12 sec car with the blower (P600B) at 8lbs and 93 octane on a true radial. (huge heavy car)

The times in my sig below are the 8.6:1 5.3. E85 fuel.



Quick Reply: How much power before e85/meth needed?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.