Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

How much power before e85/meth needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:52 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
fly boy_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default How much power before e85/meth needed?

From a week or two of reading and searching it seems that for 700-800 whp on e85 you need a hell of a fuel system to get everything to have enough overhead and will spend a lot of money on pumps that wont die, or simply having enough pump. What are the limits of 93 in FI?

I'm doing a 5.3 with a pt7675, and I want to make about 700whp with room to grow, would running straight 93 be feasible? If not, what is my limit going to be with pump 93? I read that timing will be more sensitive, and since I am running a stock bottom end that makes tuning much more critical. My tuner told me that shooting for 700 on 93 with a 5.3 wouldnt be a good idea due to knock and such causing reliability issues.
Old 12-20-2013, 03:50 PM
  #2  
Teching In
 
ls1fan00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would also like to know more about this. I will be having a very similar setup (forged 5.3, tc78, looking for 7-800rwhp) on 93 pump. e85 really isn't readily available to me. Plans for meth are in the future but not now.
Old 12-20-2013, 04:44 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
rkreigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

e85 is great. but it's for the octane and cooling properties

you can easily make 700 hp with a low compression ls engine with enough boost

just need to watch for detonation.

alchy injection makes it pretty easy

I make 800 at the tire on pump with an ECS (Julio) Alchy control system running pure methanol.

and 600 on low boost

engine is a TTiX LS6 at 8.5 to 1 with AFR heads and a mild turbo cam

600 with 12 psi on 93 octane
800 with 17.5 psi on 93 octane with alcny injection

that being said, I'm going E85 soon as I can run more boost!!
Old 12-20-2013, 06:18 PM
  #4  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fly boy_1
From a week or two of reading and searching it seems that for 700-800 whp on e85 you need a hell of a fuel system to get everything to have enough overhead and will spend a lot of money on pumps that wont die, or simply having enough pump. What are the limits of 93 in FI?

I'm doing a 5.3 with a pt7675, and I want to make about 700whp with room to grow, would running straight 93 be feasible? If not, what is my limit going to be with pump 93? I read that timing will be more sensitive, and since I am running a stock bottom end that makes tuning much more critical. My tuner told me that shooting for 700 on 93 with a 5.3 wouldnt be a good idea due to knock and such causing reliability issues.
Sounds like myth BS to me. 700-800 can be made with 80lb injectors on stock fuel lines with 2 450lph intank walbros or 3 inline $100 255 walbros. E85 is the way to go IMO.

Read up on some people making actual power and not just running their mouths.
Old 12-20-2013, 06:32 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
fly boy_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What about stock ls1 fuel rails? I know I'll need to add a -8 feed and use the stock feed as a return. What kind of duty cycle are #80 injectors going to be at near 800whp? I'll have to check out those walbro pumps, Ive seen the MM writeup on the triple pumps Id just be worried about 3 pumps all lasting without one dying and going lean.
Old 12-20-2013, 06:36 PM
  #6  
Launching!
 
1BadAsZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Florence, MS
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Are there bunches of high hp turbo cars on 93 pump gas and meth injection? Only 2 stations around here sell e85 and they aren't just right up the road so just trying to not shoot myself in the foot lol

Last edited by 1BadAsZ; 12-20-2013 at 07:55 PM.
Old 12-20-2013, 06:38 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
mike13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would verify that everything you buy is E85 compatible, only spend the money once and make sure to buy real fuel pumps and not cheap Chinese knockoffs.
Old 12-20-2013, 07:00 PM
  #8  
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,757
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

with 91octane and an intercooler i have consistently ran into knock just above 9psi. you would not think the psi number would be the limiting factor but rather horse power but it sure seems that way. this is on a 4.8, 6.0 and even a 408. they all had between 9 and 9.5/1 compression. even different cams did not seem to change the point at which knock showed up.

now switch that to 93octane and i think you could add at least 1 more psi. lets call it 10psi or 2/3 more power than NA. on a 5.3 with a mild cam you would be looking at around 500rwhp before you needed meth or e85. on a heads and cam 408 its not hard to imagine 700+.

around here 93octane and e85 cost about the same per mile to drive and there are at least a dozen stations in the area. it is crazy to not invest in a fuel system and run that stuff.
Old 12-20-2013, 07:17 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HexenLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The limit of pump gas isn't dictated by horsepower or boost, but how well the heat is kept in check. A 1.6L Honda would see knock at 120 HP with 13:1 and stock cams on 91. A 572 at 7.5:1 compression and a pair of billet 88s would make it above 1500 before it seen knock on pump gas.

There are tons of ways to keep temps low. Low compression, less timing, water or meth injection, bigger intercooler, free-flowing exhaust (less back pressure), larger turbine housings, lower degree thermostat, colder heat range plugs, nitrous, blah blah blah.
Old 12-20-2013, 08:03 PM
  #10  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fly boy_1
What about stock ls1 fuel rails? I know I'll need to add a -8 feed and use the stock feed as a return. What kind of duty cycle are #80 injectors going to be at near 800whp? I'll have to check out those walbro pumps, Ive seen the MM writeup on the triple pumps Id just be worried about 3 pumps all lasting without one dying and going lean.
You don't need a dash 8 feed. Like I said the OEM hard lines will work. If you are replacing all the lines though you might as well go with -8.

Injector duty cycle depends on the base pressure. Run 65base and the 80's will be close their limit at 850-900whp.

There are many safe guards you can use. inline pressure switches, LED's etc.

You can also buy one magnaflow 750 tuner pump. It's loud, but it's what I use and it's more than enough pump.

http://www.jegs.com/i/Magnafuel/665/...ductId=1040704

If you plan on pump you need your timing down around 10-12*. Most don't do this and have issues with knock.
Old 12-20-2013, 08:26 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
fly boy_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sorry I meant specifically for E85. All I've read I'm now convinced pump 93 will kill my little 5.3. So even with E85, still run the stock rails and everything? My tuner advised me to do #120 injectors, -8 feed and stock feed for return, and Y the -8 feed into each rail so one side doesnt lose fuel.

I was looking at speed inc rails but I'd rather not have to buy all that if I dont need to. I'd like to do a magnafuel pump like you have, but I have a plastic tank and I'd have to get a metal tank and sump it to feel comfortable running that set up on the street. Would the new AEM e85 pumps be ok if I ran two of them? It's rated at 320lph at 43psi https://sdparts.com/details/aem/50-1200
Old 12-20-2013, 09:05 PM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fly boy_1
Sorry I meant specifically for E85. All I've read I'm now convinced pump 93 will kill my little 5.3. So even with E85, still run the stock rails and everything? My tuner advised me to do #120 injectors, -8 feed and stock feed for return, and Y the -8 feed into each rail so one side doesnt lose fuel.

I was looking at speed inc rails but I'd rather not have to buy all that if I dont need to. I'd like to do a magnafuel pump like you have, but I have a plastic tank and I'd have to get a metal tank and sump it to feel comfortable running that set up on the street. Would the new AEM e85 pumps be ok if I ran two of them? It's rated at 320lph at 43psi https://sdparts.com/details/aem/50-1200
Yes, I'm talking about E85.

80lb injectors with stock fuel lines and stock fuel rail with a good pump is cheaper and easier than larger injectors, larger fuel lines and a smaller fuel pump. Either will work.
Old 12-21-2013, 01:22 AM
  #13  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
fly boy_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When you say stock do you mean a returnless system like a 4th gen has? Good to know on the rails and injectors thanks.
Old 12-21-2013, 07:14 AM
  #14  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fly boy_1
From a week or two of reading and searching it seems that for 700-800 whp on e85 you need a hell of a fuel system to get everything to have enough overhead and will spend a lot of money on pumps that wont die, or simply having enough pump. What are the limits of 93 in FI?

I'm doing a 5.3 with a pt7675, and I want to make about 700whp with room to grow, would running straight 93 be feasible? If not, what is my limit going to be with pump 93? I read that timing will be more sensitive, and since I am running a stock bottom end that makes tuning much more critical. My tuner told me that shooting for 700 on 93 with a 5.3 wouldnt be a good idea due to knock and such causing reliability issues.
It mostly boils down to compression ratio and charge cooling.

Build the engine with those things in mind and pump fuel, and 800 will not pose a problem.

However, if you wish to retain a high CR, maybe also dont have adequate cooling then you are always going to be pushing the limits of detonation resistance at that sort of level.
Old 12-21-2013, 12:43 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
CALL911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: IN
Posts: 2,940
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

HexanLord hit the nail on the head IMO.

If you don't want to use E85 (which does has its downfalls), then you are looking at only a few other options.

I am assuming race gas is out, as its just too expensive for most to run as a fuel full time. So then inter cooling does help, but on the scale you are talking you'll still need more. If you drop you CR, you could run safely on just pump gas. But it may be too low for your liking. My personal opinion would keep a somewhat lower CR (in the 8.8:1 - 9:1 range), and then run 93 octane with meth injection. That will keep you safely away from detonation, allow you to achieve your power levels, and still not have to use E85.
Old 12-21-2013, 01:14 PM
  #16  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fly boy_1
When you say stock do you mean a returnless system like a 4th gen has? Good to know on the rails and injectors thanks.
No. You would need a return style system with rising rate regulator. So if that is what your working with your original idea of using the supply as a return and running -8 line is a good idea. Might as well run the 1/2" line if you have to run a line anyway. You can still use teh returnless style rails. Just plumb the supply and return to a rising rate regulator and run a line from the regulator to the OEM rail. I did this on my setup and it worked great.

317 heads with an ls9 head gasket put you right at 8.6:1 with a dished piston 5.3. Thats what I ran. Return is on the bottom of the regulator. This setup with a -6 supply from regulator to the rail has made well over 850whp on E85.



I couldn't find a cheap adaptor in -6AN so I ran the -8AN russel adapter.

Old 12-21-2013, 05:20 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
dmaxvaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: metro detroit, mi
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
You don't need a dash 8 feed. Like I said the OEM hard lines will work. If you are replacing all the lines though you might as well go with -8.

Injector duty cycle depends on the base pressure. Run 65base and the 80's will be close their limit at 850-900whp.

There are many safe guards you can use. inline pressure switches, LED's etc.

You can also buy one magnaflow 750 tuner pump. It's loud, but it's what I use and it's more than enough pump.

http://www.jegs.com/i/Magnafuel/665/...ductId=1040704

If you plan on pump you need your timing down around 10-12*. Most don't do this and have issues with knock.
Really? i have a 390ci, s480, 1000cc injectors, and made 801 rwhp @ 90% dc. i have the holley dominator 2-1800 dual pumps, -10 feed, -8 return on e85. 80s will not support that hp rating. please stop posting rediculous #s on e85.
Old 12-21-2013, 05:45 PM
  #18  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dmaxvaz
Really? i have a 390ci, s480, 1000cc injectors, and made 801 rwhp @ 90% dc. i have the holley dominator 2-1800 dual pumps, -10 feed, -8 return on e85. 80s will not support that hp rating. please stop posting rediculous #s on e85.
You'd be 100% wrong. It's been done over and over. Your base fuel pressure wasn't high enough. The JY 5.3 record holder (well until very recently anyway) used this exact same combo. He actually dynoed 855WHP and over 1000 ftlbs through an unlocked converter, 33inch tires and a 9" rear end. Then turned the boost up to run a 8.65. Also trapped 167. All on 80# injectors with 68psi base pressure on E85. They were tapped out at that point.

Same guy has pushed 800+ on factory 3/8 hardlines on e85 on a couple different cars. Do a search.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...uel-rails.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...jection-2.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...uel-rails.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...ps-here-2.html

Last edited by Forcefed86; 12-21-2013 at 09:34 PM.
Old 12-21-2013, 06:02 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
camarokid94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
No. You would need a return style system with rising rate regulator. So if that is what your working with your original idea of using the supply as a return and running -8 line is a good idea. Might as well run the 1/2" line if you have to run a line anyway. You can still use teh returnless style rails. Just plumb the supply and return to a rising rate regulator and run a line from the regulator to the OEM rail. I did this on my setup and it worked great.

317 heads with an ls9 head gasket put you right at 8.6:1 with a dished piston 5.3. Thats what I ran. Return is on the bottom of the regulator. This setup with a -6 supply from regulator to the rail has made well over 850whp on E85.
man im pretty happy I seen you do this......... im keeping my rail lol every penny saved helps lol
Old 12-21-2013, 09:51 PM
  #20  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dmaxvaz
are you saying to start at 68psi, and go boost referenced from there? i made 801 hp with a 58psi base pressure and 17 psi boost would make it 75psi fuel pressure. if i did it your way, i'd make 85psi fuel psi, but more like 90psi running more boost, and running 90psi through stock plastic rails would probably blow apart and cause an underhoodfire.
Probably not... because it's been done many times. The above mentioned person ran 68 base and 24lbs of boost. That'd be 92psi of fuel pressure total. Keep the injectors under 100psi and your fine.


Quick Reply: How much power before e85/meth needed?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.