Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

School me on blow off valves...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2013, 09:03 AM
  #61  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

You don't want the valve open in cruise on a turbo engine as it could cause ex side load that might hurt fuel MPG and cause unwanted heat in a street car. On a cent supercharged car I would run the spring at a fairly high rate, it will make the cruising sound level lower and should lower load on the head unit. I would guess this might show up as better fuel MPG also, but I never drove one enough to check this.

Kurt
Old 01-01-2014, 09:43 AM
  #62  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
Firehawk441's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,119
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by directnosfogger
What is your theory to running two different spring rates?
Don't need both open at idle and cruise.
Old 01-01-2014, 09:54 PM
  #63  
Teching In
 
directnosfogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I might be wrong, but more air is more power. I tend to believe that at just about any rpm, the blower is putting out more air than the motor can ingest, hence the quicker I close the bypass/blow off valve, the quicker I will see boost and make more power. Sure it might only be 0.5psi of boost at 1800 rpm and half throttle, but if the bypass/blow off valve were open, it might be negative 0.5psi. So if the valve closes sooner, it'll feed the motor more air, which is more part throttle power, which makes the motor feel like it's got more cubes and more torque which is what I've always wanted.
exactly the reason i use a #6 spring, i fully support that logic, and have felt the difference in driving my vehicle before and after. and tuning the maf frequency for additional air further proves that point. that is contrary to what atomic believes, as he said a #3 will generate boost faster because of logic which i can't grasp.

Originally Posted by Atomic
Stop and realize the compressor sides of both turbos and centrifugal superchargers are the same thing. The phyics of the compressor does not change. The only difference is in how they are driven. Furthermore the belt driven superchargers are RPM dependent and the turbos are time dependent given a certain amount of exhaust energy. The outlet of the compressor never sees below ambient so your point about engine vacuum is irrelavent. The exception of course is belt driven superchargers will climb through the map at an upward angle instead of at a constant pressure like a turbo.

So with that aside, you are correct you will have exactly a hair dryer (high flow, low pressure) until you close the valve increasing pressure the turbo sees. The difference is the time it takes to do it this way versus normally climbing through the map. A supercharger wouldnt care as its not time dependent.
i fail to understand why you think a #3 spring will build boost faster than a #6, hair dryers aside.



Quick Reply: School me on blow off valves...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.