F1X vs F2
#21
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SandBox
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
please check this thread:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...s-nitrous.html
#24
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Probably won't find an f2 that has been 4.40's cause nobody runs them. They are a bastard child. Too big to be allowed in any of the radial stuff (where the f1x has shined) and too small for big tire classes.
I would love to see a 275 radial car that has been running the f1r/x switch to and f2 just to end this debate. Whether it was quicker or not.
#25
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Steve Morris has broken the 2000 hp barrier with an F2.
Probably won't find an f2 that has been 4.40's cause nobody runs them. They are a bastard child. Too big to be allowed in any of the radial stuff (where the f1x has shined) and too small for big tire classes.
I would love to see a 275 radial car that has been running the f1r/x switch to and f2 just to end this debate. Whether it was quicker or not.
Probably won't find an f2 that has been 4.40's cause nobody runs them. They are a bastard child. Too big to be allowed in any of the radial stuff (where the f1x has shined) and too small for big tire classes.
I would love to see a 275 radial car that has been running the f1r/x switch to and f2 just to end this debate. Whether it was quicker or not.
You are dead on though about the F2 being the bastard child due to it not being allowed in any of the radial classes.