Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Procharged Header opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2016, 09:40 AM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (68)
 
ICRAZY6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lacon, IL
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Question Procharged Header opinions

390 iron block
D1sc pushing 13lbs
317 heads
Brute Speed blower cam
1 3/4" pacesetter headers, no cat Y-pipe, Magnaflow exhaust.

I'm looking at 1 7/8" and wondering if there's much to be gained by switching to them from my 1 3/4" pacesetters? I know my boost level will likely decrease, but will there be more power made? Speed Engineering has them for $400.

Just seeing what everyone thought is before I pull the trigger.

If someone has a dyno comparison that would be helpful as well.

Thanks!!!
Old 04-14-2016, 10:24 AM
  #2  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Bob@BruteSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Roanoke, IN
Posts: 21,000
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

I don't think the gains will be enough to justify the cost and hassle until you're running more boost than you are. Bob
__________________
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076

PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com

https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website


Old 04-14-2016, 02:46 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

On NA setups, switching from 1 3/4" headers to 1 7/8" headers have seen as much as 25+ rwhp gains. I'd think on a Procharged setup, the gains would be even greater.
Old 04-14-2016, 03:52 PM
  #4  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Bob@BruteSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Roanoke, IN
Posts: 21,000
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

I never saw much of a difference in the lower end (cheaper) headers myself, unless a lot of boost was being used. Bob
__________________
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076

PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com

https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website


Old 04-14-2016, 04:20 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
Mike 02T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I never ran 1 3/4" headers, went straight to TSP 1 7/8".
My exhaust also dumps before the axle, Kooks 3 inch bullet mufflers. Like mentioned, it might not be worth the money. I do regret not buying a stainless set like Kooks, etc.
Old 04-14-2016, 06:18 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 7,336
Received 72 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

1 7/8 for sure. A friend of mine has the little ones on his car and we have almost identical setups and mine makes more through the midrange and up top. You never know when you'll upgrade power levels so just get them from the beginning.
Old 04-15-2016, 01:35 AM
  #7  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I'd put a 2" on it.
Old 04-15-2016, 12:26 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
King23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: KY.
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blown06
I'd put a 2" on it.
^^ this if your going from a 1 3/4 header, wouldn't it be better just to go 2" for later down the road if you ever want to step up to a f-series blower.
Old 04-15-2016, 09:45 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

2" primaries make sense for a boosted 390ci. I would run them if you can.
Old 04-16-2016, 03:12 AM
  #10  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

My .02

Header primary size/length is an important thing on an N/A combo as the scavenging effect can create some additional power.

On a blown application, scavenging is moot point. During valve overlap the boost or pressure on the intake side is just pushing additional air/fuel out the exhaust. There really is no such thing as scavenging in the exhaust system as there is never a depression in the exhaust system that is significant enough to help pull additional air/fuel into the cylinder during overlap.

In my camp, if the motor has a blower on it, use the biggest header you can fit/afford. There will not be any power loss anywhere by going bigger.

*Note: This theory of mine does not apply across the board as long as the motor is boosted. In other words.......boost from a turbo requires a whole different theory. I'm speaking only in terms of supercharged combos.
Old 04-16-2016, 06:33 AM
  #11  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

For $400, and a Saturday afternoon in the garage, it's worth it.

I ran 1 3/4 headers on my 347/D1 combo at 16.5psi, and made 760/700, but might have made closer to 800 if I had bigger headers.... is it worth it, maybe.

Trust me, I understand the debate. Right now I've had the same debate with myself over my intercooler for the past 4-5 months. I have a cheap ebay one, and could probably gain 2-3psi up top with a better one, but do I really need more than 860rwhp?
Old 04-16-2016, 07:19 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
lmt0705's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: buffalo NY
Posts: 1,706
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Um.....yes! Lol. Who doesn't need more than 860???
Old 04-16-2016, 09:51 AM
  #13  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lmt0705
Um.....yes! Lol. Who doesn't need more than 860???
Well, I'm at the limit of fuel system as well. So more power would mean a major upgrade fuel wise as well.
Old 04-16-2016, 10:50 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Often wondered how much my exhaust is holding back. 1-3/4 Kooks 3" off road Y and a Hooker catback. I've looked into Kook's 2'' header with their 3" dual behind them but its a pricey upgrade.
Old 04-17-2016, 02:26 AM
  #15  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
For $400, and a Saturday afternoon in the garage, it's worth it.

I ran 1 3/4 headers on my 347/D1 combo at 16.5psi, and made 760/700, but might have made closer to 800 if I had bigger headers.... is it worth it, maybe.

Trust me, I understand the debate. Right now I've had the same debate with myself over my intercooler for the past 4-5 months. I have a cheap ebay one, and could probably gain 2-3psi up top with a better one, but do I really need more than 860rwhp?
I really sat back and thought about this for you for like 4 hours. I decided that yes, you really need more than 860 rwhp.
Old 04-18-2016, 11:32 AM
  #16  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blown06
I really sat back and thought about this for you for like 4 hours. I decided that yes, you really need more than 860 rwhp.
Yeah, it's kind of like sitting at a bar 5 minutes before last call, 8 or 10 drinks in, and deciding if you need one more.
Old 04-18-2016, 11:42 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 15,713
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blown06
My .02

Header primary size/length is an important thing on an N/A combo as the scavenging effect can create some additional power.

On a blown application, scavenging is moot point. During valve overlap the boost or pressure on the intake side is just pushing additional air/fuel out the exhaust. There really is no such thing as scavenging in the exhaust system as there is never a depression in the exhaust system that is significant enough to help pull additional air/fuel into the cylinder during overlap.

In my camp, if the motor has a blower on it, use the biggest header you can fit/afford. There will not be any power loss anywhere by going bigger.

*Note: This theory of mine does not apply across the board as long as the motor is boosted. In other words.......boost from a turbo requires a whole different theory. I'm speaking only in terms of supercharged combos.
I have zero proof, but this is where my head is at. i'm pulling 1 3/4 off of my blown 408 for a 2" primary, 3.5" collector and dual 3.5" exhaust through bullets.
Old 04-18-2016, 11:59 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
I have zero proof, but this is where my head is at. i'm pulling 1 3/4 off of my blown 408 for a 2" primary, 3.5" collector and dual 3.5" exhaust through bullets.
You plan on sharing your results when the swap is complete ?
Old 04-18-2016, 12:11 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (68)
 
ICRAZY6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lacon, IL
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I would be interested in see those results as well.
Old 04-19-2016, 05:31 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 15,713
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

sure, but it wouldn't be an apples-apples comparison. the current setup is 1 3/4 with 3" duals H pipe and I think 80 series flowmasters (bought it this way). next setup with be a straight through muffler with an X. not really a fair comparison. also 2 different dynos, 2 different tuners and more meth this time around.


Quick Reply: Procharged Header opinions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.