Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

1,000rwhp turbo 6.0 build 317's or LS3's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2016, 02:18 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
T/ALT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default 1,000rwhp turbo 6.0 build 317's or LS3's?

Ok, putting together a twin Borgwarner S366 turbo 6.0 with Callies crank, rods and forged pistons combo. Have both stock 317 castings and stock LS3 castings. Will send off either set to be ported, good valves, springs retainers etc. Also have Holley Hi ram will be used for either head. Cam will be spec'd accordingly. Planning on running on pumpgas with meth on the street and E85 on anything over 15psi. Also have a Holley Dominator for fueling along with some 160# injectors and a powerglide for transmission to get the power transferred..
Old 09-06-2016, 02:22 PM
  #2  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

1000whp has been made on stock 317s with a stock LS1 intake and stock throttle body.

You could go literally any route you mentioned and hit 1000whp.
Old 09-06-2016, 05:17 PM
  #3  
Launching!
 
neverstop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i believe ls3 castings have thinner decks than other castings
Old 09-06-2016, 05:36 PM
  #4  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
1000whp has been made on stock 317s with a stock LS1 intake and stock throttle body.

You could go literally any route you mentioned and hit 1000whp.
This.
Old 09-06-2016, 05:37 PM
  #5  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neverstop
i believe ls3 castings have thinner decks than other castings
They are known to be thinner yes. With that said mine have seen over 28lbs and 20* pass after pass. It's all in the tune.
Old 09-06-2016, 07:57 PM
  #6  
7 Second Club
 
ls3fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 677
Received 129 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

i didnt think ls3's were thinner l92's are but if you have both allready might as well put on the ls3's IMO
Old 09-06-2016, 08:11 PM
  #7  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls3fox
i didnt think ls3's were thinner l92's are but if you have both allready might as well put on the ls3's IMO
L92's and LS3 are the exact same head just different valves
Old 09-06-2016, 08:13 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (10)
 
lilaaron233333's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: West Covina CA
Posts: 95
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd say if you have both run the LS3/L92s. Flow more and you'll have room to grow if you want to.
Old 09-07-2016, 08:00 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
T/ALT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Ok this setup is for a car we are building at the shop. I like the LS3 heads also but have been seeing all these stock 317 head 6.0's running low 8's, Brian Tooley and LJMS swear Cathedrals make more power on boost. Just trying to get the most out of this setup. It's going into a 240 so it will fly either way.
Old 09-07-2016, 08:09 AM
  #10  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

People will argue it to death. I went with L92 heads due to how cheap the LS3 intake was. They flow better than the cathedral port factory car intakes. As stated earlier you really can't go wrong either way. 317's are cheap. Maybe you can sell the LS3's and put that money back into the build.
Old 09-07-2016, 10:55 PM
  #11  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Cathedral port for life lol.
Old 09-08-2016, 08:27 AM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
2000WS6TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: finksburg, MD
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i have LS3s on mine. no problems here. Pushing about 600hp on 8lbs of boost. dont quite have the fuel to get it up to 1000hp yet. working on it though.
Old 09-08-2016, 10:14 AM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
 
Nali6.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Danbury, Ct
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

put the ls3 on and sell my the high ram for the 317s lmao...
Old 09-10-2016, 09:05 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
T/ALT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Ok we decided on going with the 317's for a few good reasons. The heads are actually L92's with the big heavy valves and both BTR and LJMS agreed the 317's would make more tq and HP under the curve which is what gets a drag car from A to B. Will put the L92's and Holley Hi-Ram for sale and looking for a stock set of nice 317 casting heads for this build. The 317's that were at the shop have since been used on another build.



Quick Reply: 1,000rwhp turbo 6.0 build 317's or LS3's?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 PM.