Ls9 Head Gaskets
But if someone is blowing **** up all the time...you can be sure it isnt because they used LS1 gaskets instead of LS9...or projected plugs instead of non projected.
It isnt margin's they need....it's simple tuning knowledge. Dont run too lean, and dont detonate the **** out of it. In fact....never ever let there be detonation even at the mildest onset of it.
Very simple and generic rules that lead to reliable running.
You must have read from the book of Rotary. The majority of people on here want margin in their real street cars and DD's, not random crap like "tune good".
You must have read from the book of Rotary. The majority of people on here want margin in their real street cars and DD's, not random crap like "tune good".But for now lets stick to the one you keep mentioning as so important ? Projected or non.
Couldnt resist
Nobody has literally blown their stuff up and then ran exactly the same setup, tune and all, with non projected plugs and didn't blow it up. That's the same as the low CR vs high CR motor comparison that doesn't exist. But since you mentioned that the heat range is totally separate from the tip being projected or not. 30 seconds of googling shows that's not true. The longer the insulating tip the hotter the plug, the hotter the plug the more chance of detonation. Plenty of discussion over on yellow bullet and even NGK has info on their site stating this. The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Jon.
When I first got into LS turbo, it was understood at the time that about 500-600 RWHP was the limit for SBE's, rod-bolts were an absolute requirement, head-studs and gaskets etc etc. We have all learned in recent years that rod-bolts are unnecessary, SBE's can hold a HELL of alot more power than initially thought, and now, head gaskets and studs may not even be necessary for moderate power levels. Amazing stuff. We also learned that the tune is the single-most important factor in keeping a motor alive. My cam, spring, and head-stud only 120k LQ9 has not even had the heads off and is being subjected to 16-17 psi pulls for several thousand miles on 93 and a whiff of 50/50 water injection. At this point, I don't even think head-studs are necessary. I do believe running the least amount of timing necessary to make the "number" and a somewhat looser converter aid in longevity, especially on 93.
I'm building another Mustang with a LQ4/4l80e, and this engine has 195k miles. Still has 195lbs compression all the way around. I pulled the heads just to change the lifters as I would hate to wipe out a $400.00 cam due to a lifter going south. But I'll probably go with studs and LS9 gaskets b/c they are cheap and the studs are easier from a service stand-point.
Carry-on...
Proper block and head surface and prep plus proper torque is likely more beneficial in this case and what should be scrutinized.
Jon.
Oh *****...so all those mile or 1km events I've ran over last few years at over 1k with projected nose plugs on pump+meth was asking for trouble. Nope...no trouble. Maybe it was because I dont have AC though ?
500hp is childs play and most at that level are still running 6's, which is a mile off even contemplating non projected plugs.
Trivial ? Your thoughts on plugs are trivial.
But the stock LS1 gasket will easily handle what you're doing...and then double the boost too. There is a price difference...if that matters just stick LS1. If you want correct gasket diameter, just stick with LS1.
If you dont care about either of those and want the LS9's anyway....again no harm in doing so.
Last edited by stevieturbo; Jun 2, 2017 at 04:21 PM.
My LS1 gaskets failed because the clean up cut on my heads was to coarse. My machinist has old equipment for surfacing.
It was easy to see the root cause.
I fixed that, went to LS9 gaskets (alum 5.3) problem solved.
Since you you can certainly buy cold extended tip plugs, I think you guys should study plug design further.











