Turbo Ls e85 afr and timing
Ethanol burns faster flame front wise than 91 octane. With 2 identical engines MBT timing will be lower on E85 than it will be on a standard premium octane (91/93) tune. This is of course assuming you can reach MBT timing levels without detonation on both engines. If you can’t, guys will crutch the “pump gas” tune with super low advance... that’s a different story as E85 will of course not need that crutch.
Also now that I think back on it I wonder how the dished piston and piston stop setup worked together. That may have been a mistake on my part.
Also now that I think back on it I wonder how the dished piston and piston stop setup worked together. That may have been a mistake on my part.
I set timing at 16-17 degrees on all the turbo E85 cars I tune. Plugs always show the timing is good.
What are your thoughts?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
What are your thoughts?
I’d verify those EGT temps are accurate. If so, they are extremely hot and you should not operate at those temps. I doubt those temps are very accurate as they would be melting plug straps. And your plug reading would not be “OK”. Do you have a pic of your plug? Do you know how to read them properly? What procedure did you use to read the plug?
Have you checked cranking compression? Sure cam isn’t off a tooth?
Straight from NGK
What WBO2 are you using that reads E85 AFR? Are you sure the WB02 readings are correct? Can you verify with LAMBDA numbers? Or “gas scale” numbers?
Knock likely was not happening either. You were probably just getting goofy harmonics that the sensor picked up on. Without OEM style soft mounting, knock sensors are basically useless. There is too much noise in general to detect actual knock VS noise in general. I’m not saying they aren’t great tools, just that many times they aren’t useable.
thanks
timing was marked at tdc and is at 0 when programmed to 0
egt sensor was boiled in water and read 100 deg C
Water to air intercooled 5200 at 8 psi MAT 97deg F
Holley NTK sensor thru the holley software
runs to well to have valve timing incorrect
no I haven't checked cranking compression
no I haven't got an accurate plug reading as the boat is single seat enclosed cockpit and gets driven back to the bank but they are not blistered or melted but the heat band is nearly at the base
Last edited by selff123; Aug 23, 2018 at 06:26 PM. Reason: More information photo
Then again I’ve never heard of cooking off heat wrap either. I run 16lbs or so non intercooled on E60 with 19* in my 5.3 and the heat wrap is perfectly fine.
Only time i’ve seen manifolds glowing at moderate loads like you are talking about is when a cam was installed a tooth retarded. Compression check might be a good indicator. The engine was just down on power... it idled and drove fine (aside from glowing manifolds). Might also verify timing as you raise the RPM and ensure it isn’t wandering.
Did you degree the cam when you installed it?
I also had a 5.3 with a crank keyed 8* retarded from the factory. Installed my cam dot to dot with oem timing set. It idled great and ran smooth. Just way down on power. Re-degreed the cam with 8* back in it and picked up 12MPH at the track at the same boost level... (if you aren’t a drag race guy thats a huge power gain) I’m betting EGT was thru the roof on that setup too.
To get a good WOT fuel reading might be impossible, but to get a good heat reading you should be ok. Just toss in a new plug and go WOT. (no anti-seize) Pull plug when you can. Having a bunch of idle/cruise time on it will just foul up the fueling marks, not so much the heat mark on the ground strap.
Best of luck with it... its will need more than a tune adjustment IMO.
Next time in the water we will try a few other variations with the egt probe 1/1/2" out from head header flange
15 deg and super rich with fresh plugs
then 20 and see if the knock sensors or plugs show detonation
And take it to 6000 this time
Yes the cam was dialed in with a new rollmaster chain specs were for 109 centreline and it was 109.5 so I left it alone
I'll get some DEI Titainium wrap as the chinese stuff on it obviously cant cope
just for your interest a clip at 5200rpm
https://www.facebook.com/133853830004136/videos/711088422561733/
egt probe at header flange, afr at 7.5 programmed in the holley software, E85 scale,another wide band standalone in the dump pipe to read lambda scale
6200 rpm 8-9 psi boost 16 deg timing 1530F egt .78 lambda
Where I was going wrong was thinking I had to program in altered AFR ratios for the E70 fuel scaling them between E85 stoich of 9.9 and gas At 14.7
wot 8.5 or 12.5 gas I found a table for percentages of ethanol blends and AFR ratios to suit which I used as a guide BUT I was wrong. the programmed AFR in the Holley must be/ is just a lambda reading and scaled to E85 or gas so the blend doesn't matter the reading will be same but will take more(high ethanol blend) or less fuel in the base table to get it.The Holley data was 7.5AFR and the standalone lambda .78 which is the same (well almost)
next run more timing and fuel
this clip is at 5600
https://www.facebook.com/133853830004136/videos/903454796504941/no one filmed the last lap at 6200 just our luck as she was actually flying as a hydro should
whats your thoughts on more power at the 3000 mark? boost is there but big load with our big gears in the corner I was thinking boost control I'm just on spring only now,give it more 3000-4000( if its there, to get) then back it off again for the straight and longativitiy of the engine hydros need less power when they are up out of the water
Last edited by selff123; Aug 28, 2018 at 06:16 AM.
90% of failures are crushing the ring lands and/or bending rods. I’ve yet to see a turbo LS fail due to rod bolt failure or over revving. Aftermarket rod bolts or not. Latest trend with the record holder SBE guys to it rev them clear past 8k. One of them has the limiter set at 8400 and I’ve heard him hit it on many passes. Last I checked on FB he had almost 90 7 second passes at over 170mph on that engine this year and is still going.
I’d be more worried about the GEN3 rod strength at low RPM than anything. At 10-12lbs I don’t’ think you have much to worry about. I think you’d be fine up 15 easy the way it sits, likely more. I’ve bent a few GEN3 rods around 800ish crank (25lbs on my setup) with a very conservative tune... but I wasn’t geared to rev it over 6500. Think I shot myself in the foot there. I’ve seen others bend the gen3 stuff around 600hp. It’s mostly in the tune and how you load it at PK TQ IMO.











