Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Boosting my L92, too much cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2018, 07:42 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
CasperCasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Boosting my L92, too much cam?

Hey all,

Going to try and throw a turbo on my lq4/l92 over the winter. It's got a 225/230/111 with heads milled .030. Thinking of going with a 7875. Is this too much cam for this setup? I'm a bit concerned about the compression ratio as well. I'd appreciate your input.

Thanks
Old 06-11-2018, 08:33 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
jasonsnova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 382
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i have a ljms cam specd . its almost identical to that , my car is a 6.0 with ls3 heads so almost identical. except im running a t6 s475.....it lights off great . im very happy with it.
with the 7875 it should come in even sooner.....
Old 09-02-2018, 03:35 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
CasperCasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Do you think the 7875 is a bit small for this application? Would an s475 make more sense?
Old 09-02-2018, 05:20 PM
  #4  
7 Second Club
 
ls3fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 665
Received 115 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

7875 is gonna be too small for a motor that size i run an s475 it lights fast and makes more power then my 275 drag radials can handle at 12lbs
Old 09-02-2018, 09:18 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,816
Received 583 Likes on 461 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jasonsnova
i have a ljms cam specd . its almost identical to that , my car is a 6.0 with ls3 heads so almost identical. except im running a t6 s475.....it lights off great . im very happy with it.
with the 7875 it should come in even sooner.....
who makes the turbo? Isn’t that a Bw ? Excuse my ignorance , FI is Greek to me LOL
Old 09-03-2018, 11:54 AM
  #6  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
3pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WPG MB
Posts: 1,931
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The 78 75 has too small of a turbine for a 6.0. Get yourself a Borg Warner S475/96. A 1.32 ex housing will work, but a 1.1 is available which will help it spool much earlier.
The 225/230 111 cam is not too big, but it has a bit of extra overlap that you dont need. I would degree it to a 109* intake centerline, and run it.
I personally had excellent success with a 227/235 114 cam in my 6.0 with LS3 heads, S480 combo.
Barrett
Old 09-03-2018, 01:12 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
CasperCasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the advice. Im green to FI and love to hear about your setups. I'm thinking I will go with the t4 housing option. Does this sound reasonable? Ultimately I want the power to come on early as possible.
Old 09-03-2018, 01:16 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
CasperCasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Also, where would you recommend purchasing from? I see a ton of these on ebay for 500 bucks or so.
Old 09-03-2018, 01:22 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

6 speed or auto? If 6 speed and you want power as early as possible, that turbo is not too small. It'll be great at lower rpm's and spool quick which will pair well with the stick.
Old 09-03-2018, 01:33 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

I used a six liter with the billet 7875 and it was awesome. Killer street combo. Eventually though it became limited by the turbine wheel and created backpressure ratios of 3:1 on only 16 psi.

But if I were shooting for a fun 600 wheel on pump gas and water/meth- I would not hesitate for a sec to run one again. I got bit by the s480 bug and while it makes a ton of power, it's not as snappy as the 7875.
Old 09-03-2018, 01:46 PM
  #11  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
3pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WPG MB
Posts: 1,931
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Goals for the combo are certainly where the decision should be made.
My perspective is 800rwhp. If you are not looking for anywhere near that, then yes the 78/75 could work, but it will still choke the 6.0 up at higher rpm, which I don't like. I don't recommend it on any 6.0.
On my 6.0, s480 combo, I ran a 92mm turbine, 1.1a/r housing, and the thing spooled at 3K, and was an absolute blast to street drive with my 5spd on 10psi. That was 600rwhp.
​​​​​ It layed down 800rwhp on 16psi.
Barrett
Old 09-03-2018, 02:28 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
CasperCasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

My goals definately lie at 600whp. The car is from 1973 and I know it wont hold up to much more than that. So now Im torn between the 475 and the 7875. I really like the idea of the snappy 7875.

btw i appreciate all the help. If any of you ever come to vancouver come by and we'll melt some tires
Old 09-03-2018, 02:38 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

600whp goal=7875 hands down. Will make a great street car.
Old 09-04-2018, 01:20 AM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Kfxguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,068
Received 548 Likes on 428 Posts
Default

I have a 7875 on3 on my ls1 5.7, ported 243 Heads, 227/234 113ls, it has almost no lag and pulls to 7000. I’m only on 3.5psi right now but it’s very responsive. It improved the drivability also. It comes into boost almost immediately. 5.7 is not much smaller than a 6 liter.
Old 09-04-2018, 09:48 AM
  #15  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
3pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WPG MB
Posts: 1,931
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I guarantee that when you turn the boost up and try revving it out a bit, you will see significant back pressure. This may not hurt you too bad if you plan to keep the boost fairly low and never push the combo.
Old 09-04-2018, 10:06 AM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3pedals
I guarantee that when you turn the boost up and try revving it out a bit, you will see significant back pressure. This may not hurt you too bad if you plan to keep the boost fairly low and never push the combo.
Nobody's arguing that at higher boost its out of the efficiency range....OP's goals do not require that.
Old 09-04-2018, 10:19 AM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Kfxguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,068
Received 548 Likes on 428 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3pedals
I guarantee that when you turn the boost up and try revving it out a bit, you will see significant back pressure. This may not hurt you too bad if you plan to keep the boost fairly low and never push the combo.

i dont plan on going over 7-8lbs any time soon. Supposedly this turbo is good to about 700hp. I did leave room to grow if I want to upgrade. My goal is only about 550-600rwhp and good manners.
Old 09-04-2018, 12:01 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

With a billet precision, my 6.0 made 820/908tq and that was at 21psi and 14 degrees (dropped to 765/900tq with the On3). For what his goal is, the 7875 will be fine.
Old 09-04-2018, 01:31 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
CasperCasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

So once again Im back at the 7875. I cant forsee wanting more than 600whp. For starters ive got a stock 10 bolt posi. Car has a built richmond super t10 that I got from a race car guy so we will see how she holds. More or less mystery internals from a very reputable seller in NC. The bottom line is this car just wouldnt do well with a whole lot more than its got, hence why im shooting for a conservative power number. I will keep you all updated and make a vlog build thread, videos will be posted on my youtube channel ( westcoast wrenchin' ). Thanks again!
Old 09-04-2018, 01:49 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

link a video here and i'll sub you. I do the youtubes too and try and sub all ls1tech folks


Quick Reply: Boosting my L92, too much cam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.