6300+ rpm, a death wish for a sbe turbo LS?
12-22-2018, 07:57 AM
#22
thats a joke I’ve been 7500+ stock pushrods stock rockers for 2 years not a single problem
12-22-2018, 11:31 PM
#23
12-23-2018, 03:36 PM
#24
First time I upped my rev limiter to 6800rpm on comp 918 springs and a stock cam and rockers, the pushrods all bent. Every single one of them. Your results may vary. That being said, I would be interested in seeing your pushrods roll flat on a sheet of glass. You may have bent them without knowing.
12-24-2018, 07:49 PM
#25
TECH Fanatic
Ive tuned or helped refine tunes on a few stock bottom turbo cars running bottom 8's in the 1/4 the past couple years.
8,000-8,200 rpm shifts every pass. Stock lifters and rockers without trunnions in one ljms stage 3 turbo cam setup.
If anything the higher power stuff last longer revving them past peak torque. The mass amounts of load and over timing things break more frequently than any rpm or horsepower figure. To a degree. I know of quite a few people making 1,100 hp on stock bottom setups for quite some time. A few have broken throughout time but that is the sbe gamble.
8,000-8,200 rpm shifts every pass. Stock lifters and rockers without trunnions in one ljms stage 3 turbo cam setup.
If anything the higher power stuff last longer revving them past peak torque. The mass amounts of load and over timing things break more frequently than any rpm or horsepower figure. To a degree. I know of quite a few people making 1,100 hp on stock bottom setups for quite some time. A few have broken throughout time but that is the sbe gamble.
12-24-2018, 11:43 PM
#26
Ive tuned or helped refine tunes on a few stock bottom turbo cars running bottom 8's in the 1/4 the past couple years.
8,000-8,200 rpm shifts every pass. Stock lifters and rockers without trunnions in one ljms stage 3 turbo cam setup.
If anything the higher power stuff last longer revving them past peak torque. The mass amounts of load and over timing things break more frequently than any rpm or horsepower figure. To a degree. I know of quite a few people making 1,100 hp on stock bottom setups for quite some time. A few have broken throughout time but that is the sbe gamble.
8,000-8,200 rpm shifts every pass. Stock lifters and rockers without trunnions in one ljms stage 3 turbo cam setup.
If anything the higher power stuff last longer revving them past peak torque. The mass amounts of load and over timing things break more frequently than any rpm or horsepower figure. To a degree. I know of quite a few people making 1,100 hp on stock bottom setups for quite some time. A few have broken throughout time but that is the sbe gamble.
12-25-2018, 02:03 AM
#27
Ive tuned or helped refine tunes on a few stock bottom turbo cars running bottom 8's in the 1/4 the past couple years.
8,000-8,200 rpm shifts every pass. Stock lifters and rockers without trunnions in one ljms stage 3 turbo cam setup.
If anything the higher power stuff last longer revving them past peak torque. The mass amounts of load and over timing things break more frequently than any rpm or horsepower figure. To a degree. I know of quite a few people making 1,100 hp on stock bottom setups for quite some time. A few have broken throughout time but that is the sbe gamble.
8,000-8,200 rpm shifts every pass. Stock lifters and rockers without trunnions in one ljms stage 3 turbo cam setup.
If anything the higher power stuff last longer revving them past peak torque. The mass amounts of load and over timing things break more frequently than any rpm or horsepower figure. To a degree. I know of quite a few people making 1,100 hp on stock bottom setups for quite some time. A few have broken throughout time but that is the sbe gamble.