'90 s10 build

Might be ok if you are only planning on running 12s but if it's gonna fly then it will be beneficial to spend some time with a sheet of Allstar aluminum and some pop rivets.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Might be ok if you are only planning on running 12s but if it's gonna fly then it will be beneficial to spend some time with a sheet of Allstar aluminum and some pop rivets.
not sure but they may not pass the rear strut bars as they must be no lower than 4" of the top of the main hoop
Are you going to do an x or tri x in the middle of the strut bars?
If so that might appeal to their rule
I'm going to mount my fuel cell and build a parachute mount next.
I'm floating around ideas how I want to lay things out, like fuel cell, bed mounting, battery, etc. Talking to orange, I'm trying to think of a way to get as much weight over the rear end, without putting too much in the back of it. This is just something I'm brainstorming.
Red is where the fuel cell is mounted
Blue will be the bed mount for the rear
I'll be deleting the bars from the bed mount location back
Black X are will additional crossmembers will be
I'm kind of debating on whether or not to leave the whole back open and remove the
Last edited by 9outofs10; Dec 16, 2019 at 10:23 AM.
A triangulated 4-link does not require a panhard bar, as the triangulation locates the axle laterally. There is much less binding on roll. This suspension should be the lightest.
A 3-link simplifies adjustments in that you would only need to adjust the center link to change pinion angle or instant center (or both), but you would need a panhard again for lateral location. I -think- you would still be able to pre-load one of the parallel links for tuning if you had to. Though there is an optimal location for the center link based on track width (and wheel base?) that would provide the most ideal launch - it's not centered in the middle.







