Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Compound setup. ProCharger feeding turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2020 | 05:54 PM
  #61  
AwesomeAuto's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 478
Default

Originally Posted by wretched73
I'm really disappointed in your responses. I've been following Atomic's build for years now, he is consistently trying to be different.

As someone who went 4 turbo, when doing a single would have netted the same or better results, I expected you to appreciate him trying to work outside of the box.
Then you're misinterpreting. Like you said, they were responses. They're responses to people saying the blower is used for low end torque and throttle response, and the turbos top end power. I'm just saying that the same result could be achieved without the dual power adders. I'm not saying it isn't creative or different, and I'm not saying that I don't like it. People are theorizing about why when its very likely not the reason he did what he did.

Don't make it what it isn't. Ill be the first to admit that 4 turbos is 100% completely unnecessary for what I'm doing. Does that mean I don't appreciate my own setup?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2020 | 06:04 PM
  #62  
wretched73's Avatar
Launching!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 242
Likes: 83
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
The posts we're about efficiency and gains....not trying to look cool and think outside the box. If we were going for the cool factor, everyone would have a blower 2 turbos and a bottle of N2O in their cars.
Originally Posted by AwesomeAuto
Then you're misinterpreting. Like you said, they were responses. They're responses to people saying the blower is used for low end torque and throttle response, and the turbos top end power. I'm just saying that the same result could be achieved without the dual power adders. I'm not saying it isn't creative or different, and I'm not saying that I don't like it. People are theorizing about why when its very likely not the reason he did what he did.

Don't make it what it isn't. Ill be the first to admit that 4 turbos is 100% completely unnecessary for what I'm doing. Does that mean I don't appreciate my own setup?
Then there are 2 different conversations happening on the same thread.

IMO, anyone who wants to try compound boost should do it. The regurgitated one size fits all setup, is old.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2020 | 06:23 PM
  #63  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by wretched73
Then there are 2 different conversations happening on the same thread.

IMO, anyone who wants to try compound boost should do it. The regurgitated one size fits all setup, is old.
Yup it is old....like 100 years old....and just happens to still work better than compounding at going faster. That's said, everyone has a choice to do what they want with their money.....unless you live in CA
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2020 | 07:04 PM
  #64  
DavidBoren's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 123
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

It can work, just depends what you are looking for.

If I remember correctly, the supercharged 2.0L LSJ, compounded with the LK9 turbo was relatively popular for creating power-dense little motors.

Sticking a turbo in front of a positive displacement blower is a great idea, especially for elevation compensation. Roots/TVS blowers move volume, and adding a turbo to provide a measured mass makes sense.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 04:41 AM
  #65  
chuntington101's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by AwesomeAuto
He went a nearly identical 6.3x on a single turbo.
He could've done that on a blower as well and had the low end torque and throttle response he was aiming for.
None of this was necessary.

As someone who has done compound blower/turbo setups AND has 4 turbos on his car, I can absolutely say whether or not this is necessary LOL.
for drag racing compound doesn’t make any sense. The SC will just be adding weight and restriction as you have time to get the turbo spinning whilst sat on the line. And with an auto you are WOT the whole time so never slowing the turbo down (much).

Hill climbing, road racing, rallying, etc. is the exact opposite. Lots of throttle modulation and the need for instant power. Any ‘lag’ is time lost. Yes you can around it with anti lag, rocket boxes, N2O, etc. but it’s still masking the issue. As soon as you close the throttle the turbo is slowing down. As you go WOT it takes time for the turbo shaft speed to come up. This is why people love PD blowers for HPDE cars and street cars, they feel fast (torque all the time).

(Not trying to teach anyone to suck eggs)
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 06:49 AM
  #66  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
for drag racing compound doesn’t make any sense. The SC will just be adding weight and restriction as you have time to get the turbo spinning whilst sat on the line. And with an auto you are WOT the whole time so never slowing the turbo down (much).

Hill climbing, road racing, rallying, etc. is the exact opposite. Lots of throttle modulation and the need for instant power. Any ‘lag’ is time lost. Yes you can around it with anti lag, rocket boxes, N2O, etc. but it’s still masking the issue. As soon as you close the throttle the turbo is slowing down. As you go WOT it takes time for the turbo shaft speed to come up. This is why people love PD blowers for HPDE cars and street cars, they feel fast (torque all the time).

(Not trying to teach anyone to suck eggs)
Theres no reason a turbo only setup won't perform for all other types of racing. The turbo has to be sized properly for it. All the OEM racing stuff have full boost by 2k rpms, some even earlier. Size it right for the application.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 06:53 AM
  #67  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Default

All the OEM racing stuff ?

What exactly is that ? And why would a racing car be concerned about sub 2k rpm ?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 07:46 AM
  #68  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
All the OEM racing stuff ?

What exactly is that ? And why would a racing car be concerned about sub 2k rpm ?
Serious? There are multiple racing classes out there that require OEM engines and only allow suspension and brake upgrades. I don't know of a single OEMs that use a turbocharged motor on a mass production street car that designs the turbos for max power at max rpm. They design it for part throttle and low-end/midrange. They under sized the turbos intentionally.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 09:59 AM
  #69  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
Serious? There are multiple racing classes out there that require OEM engines and only allow suspension and brake upgrades. I don't know of a single OEMs that use a turbocharged motor on a mass production street car that designs the turbos for max power at max rpm. They design it for part throttle and low-end/midrange. They under sized the turbos intentionally.
So they don't design them for drag racing ? They don't design them for maximum power ? They don't design them for one single thing ? Going as fast as possible ?

A bit like the guy asking about using two forms of boost to achieve what he wants...

Weird eh.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 10:09 AM
  #70  
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,025
Likes: 952
From: No VA
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
All the OEM racing stuff ?

What exactly is that ? And why would a racing car be concerned about sub 2k rpm ?
The whole TCR class is OEM turbo cars, Honda, Hyundai, VW/Audi, Kia, Subaru etc all compete. Most have less power than their road going counterparts. Then you have factory backed turbo GT cars with from Mazda, Nissan, Acura, BMW, etc so the OEM racing list is quite expansive.

Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 10:22 AM
  #71  
jaydubb's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 227
Likes: 29
From: DC Metro area
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
They design it for part throttle and low-end/midrange. They under sized the turbos intentionally.
AKA VR30DDTT... smh
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 10:56 AM
  #72  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
So they don't design them for drag racing ? They don't design them for maximum power ? They don't design them for one single thing ? Going as fast as possible ?

A bit like the guy asking about using two forms of boost to achieve what he wants...

Weird eh.
what was your point? To ask a question about OEM class racing and then acknowledge exactly what I said? Did I not already say above that it's his money and he can do what he wants? Yup.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 10:57 AM
  #73  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by jaydubb
AKA VR30DDTT... smh
I'll hold it down until you return. Now I'm just bitter because you were making the path to HPT easier for me.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 11:02 AM
  #74  
jaydubb's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 227
Likes: 29
From: DC Metro area
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
I'll hold it down until you return. Now I'm just bitter because you were making the path to HPT easier for me.
Dude, you dont know how much I miss that fricken car. If it wasnt for me about to buy this house, I'd have another one right now. But I will resist temptation and wait until spring/summer. Messed up thing was, I had JUST licensed the car the day before. I was going to start tuning it on the day it got wrecked. Got wrecked at 1:30am the same day........
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 11:08 AM
  #75  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by jaydubb
Dude, you dont know how much I miss that fricken car. If it wasnt for me about to buy this house, I'd have another one right now. But I will resist temptation and wait until spring/summer. Messed up thing was, I had JUST licensed the car the day before. I was going to start tuning it on the day it got wrecked. Got wrecked at 1:30am the same day........
😳That hurts big time. Congrats on the house tho!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2020 | 09:31 AM
  #76  
Speed Freek's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 162
Likes: 6
From: So.Cal
Default

So Im also building a rear mount setup for my LS swapped Tacoma. Does anyone have links to some good rear mount setups? Just wondering about turbo sizing, proper scavenging pump, and any other things needed to get it setup, Im going to do this before I turbo the Camaro for now...
Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2020 | 09:39 AM
  #77  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Speed Freek
So Im also building a rear mount setup for my LS swapped Tacoma. Does anyone have links to some good rear mount setups? Just wondering about turbo sizing, proper scavenging pump, and any other things needed to get it setup, Im going to do this before I turbo the Camaro for now...
Thanks!
I've got a rear mount build thread on here. If you do a search you'll find it. There is also the "Zombie rear mount saga" thread that is also good info if you search for that as well.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2020 | 11:24 AM
  #78  
Shownomercy's Avatar
Man-Crush Warning
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 129
Default

turbowerx exa pump.

Don't cheap out.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2020 | 11:59 AM
  #79  
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,025
Likes: 952
From: No VA
Default

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
turbowerx exa pump.

Don't cheap out.
Well you can cheap out, especially if you want to just get it running and swap some parts out later. I tried the ebay oil gear pump for $60 basically to mock up my rear mount but it worked fine, just noisy. I then swapped to the Turbowerx Spartan pump which was much quieter and worked fine as well. Turbowerx Exa is generally good and have used them personally in the past, but I've also seen two recent failures that left the vehicles undrivable. I ended up scrapping the rear mount and going back to front mount twins anyway.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2020 | 01:19 PM
  #80  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Turbowerx Spartan here going strong still.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 AM.