Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Intercooled intake manifold question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2021, 03:46 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Unclebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Intercooled intake manifold question.

Quick break down here. I'm ls swapping a bronco and I'm looking at doing a single turbo 4.8l. I'm trying to save as much space as possible in the engine bay. My question is how well do the a2w intercoolers that sandwich into the Holley midram intakes work? I'm only looking at a 450-500hp motor and I don't want an intercooler hanging low under the front of the bronco. With the a2w I can put a pretty large yet thin heat exchanger infront of the radiator and keep all my components safe that way. And no I'm not trying to troll lol. Trying to make the best use of the engine bay.

Last edited by Unclebud; 04-10-2021 at 04:31 PM.
Old 04-10-2021, 07:37 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
AwesomeAuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,042
Received 430 Likes on 301 Posts
Default

That's a lot of money wasted to cool 450-500 HP.
Old 04-10-2021, 08:00 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Unclebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AwesomeAuto
That's a lot of money wasted to cool 450-500 HP.
lol i know right? but hey i get to say i have a turbo. On a serious note i rather have an over built cooling system that can keep up when I'm beating on it.

Last edited by Unclebud; 04-10-2021 at 08:07 PM.
Old 04-11-2021, 11:54 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
AwesomeAuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,042
Received 430 Likes on 301 Posts
Default

A small ebay air-to-air intercooler was enough to keep my temps down for 4 turbos making ~900 whp on a 4.8 with a stock truck intake at fairly mild boost.

A Hi-Ram or Mid-Ram and an air-to-water intercooler is far beyond what you need for half of that.
Old 04-12-2021, 09:55 AM
  #5  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 944 Likes on 700 Posts

Default

It really depends on what you mean by beat on it. A lot of people think ohh that cute little intercooler works for XXX power on a single gear dyno pull, but what happens when you do 6 back to back 1/4 mile hits, or 25 street pulls in 30 mins, or get in a mud bog at high RPM with almost no air flow. Oddly enough in my testing no intercooler heat soaked less than an intercooler that was too small for the task. The small intercooler couldn't dissipate the heat fast enough and didn't return to ambient fast enough before the next pull, so it had a higher initial IAT than no intercooler. With no intercooler I was back to ambient before the turn around and hit the same max IAT every time, the intercooler results were wildly varied with cooler IAT's the first hit but progressively got worse up until a point they were no better than the non intercooled results.

What turbo are you using and what boost are you trying to run for 500hp? What fuel are you going to run?
Old 04-12-2021, 10:38 AM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Unclebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
It really depends on what you mean by beat on it. A lot of people think ohh that cute little intercooler works for XXX power on a single gear dyno pull, but what happens when you do 6 back to back 1/4 mile hits, or 25 street pulls in 30 mins, or get in a mud bog at high RPM with almost no air flow. Oddly enough in my testing no intercooler heat soaked less than an intercooler that was too small for the task. The small intercooler couldn't dissipate the heat fast enough and didn't return to ambient fast enough before the next pull, so it had a higher initial IAT than no intercooler. With no intercooler I was back to ambient before the turn around and hit the same max IAT every time, the intercooler results were wildly varied with cooler IAT's the first hit but progressively got worse up until a point they were no better than the non intercooled results.

What turbo are you using and what boost are you trying to run for 500hp? What fuel are you going to run?
I'm looking to run pump gas and maybe a single s366 I believe is the turbo I've been ending back up on.(turbo stuff is pretty new to me) Heck my numbers stated may be higher than what it's capable of. I'm trying to make a pretty conservative setup that I can cruise and make decent fuel mileage yet have enough power to get out of its own way on the interstate. Long term goal is the bronco will eventually have a full long travel suspension and would like to have a little extra power on tap if I take it to the dunes without having to run a big cube motor.
Old 04-12-2021, 10:49 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,464
Received 154 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

For the power you want.... if you ran e85 you probably don't even need an intercooler. Just do some methanol injection.
Old 04-12-2021, 10:57 AM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 944 Likes on 700 Posts

Default

Single S366 or S369 could easily get you there. You opposed to running a meth kit?
Old 04-12-2021, 11:02 AM
  #9  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 944 Likes on 700 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gnx7
For the power you want.... if you ran e85 you probably don't even need an intercooler. Just do some methanol injection.
True, or even E50. E50 has been perfectly fine on lower boost levels for me non-intercooled and not as bad a MPG hit as E85 for a street car. I've also run direct port meth with pump gas which worked well. Just can't get greedy with timing, let boost do the work.
Old 04-12-2021, 12:19 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Unclebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
Single S366 or S369 could easily get you there. You opposed to running a meth kit?
I am trying to avoid a meth kit, not saying it won't happen but if I can avoid it I will. I did find out that I can fit a 2010 super duty bumper on my bronco so that may give me a protected spot for an intercooler seeing they have a slot for air flow. Id just have to see how much space there is behind the bumper.
Old 04-12-2021, 12:26 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Unclebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
True, or even E50. E50 has been perfectly fine on lower boost levels for me non-intercooled and not as bad a MPG hit as E85 for a street car. I've also run direct port meth with pump gas which worked well. Just can't get greedy with timing, let boost do the work.
My only issue with e50 or e85 is that it's super difficult to find in my area and I plan on driving this bronco quite a bit. If I was just going to make it a toy I'd definitely go that route though.
Old 04-12-2021, 01:06 PM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 944 Likes on 700 Posts

Default

Gotcha, if no E and no meth then your pretty much stuck with an IC core. The hi-ram style intercoolers work well, but I'm not a fan of the mid-ram style base. I think Ticks offering is a bit cheaper than 417 or Shearer.
Old 04-12-2021, 01:57 PM
  #13  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,674
Received 1,113 Likes on 730 Posts

Default

Those a/w cores for a Holley __ ram intake are not cheap, 417 or Shearer. Have you priced those out?
Old 04-12-2021, 02:07 PM
  #14  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Unclebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Those a/w cores for a Holley __ ram intake are not cheap, 417 or Shearer. Have you priced those out?
Had to edit that your talking about a completely different a2w intake aren't you? Let me check those out.
Old 04-12-2021, 02:38 PM
  #15  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,674
Received 1,113 Likes on 730 Posts

Default

417 Motorsports and Shearerfab make the cooler bricks that sandwich between the upper and lower intake components. Is there another you are looking at? My point is they are not cheap, and you are pairing it with a 4.8 and a pretty small turbo.
Old 04-12-2021, 02:49 PM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Unclebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
417 Motorsports and Shearerfab make the cooler bricks that sandwich between the upper and lower intake components. Is there another you are looking at? My point is they are not cheap, and you are pairing it with a 4.8 and a pretty small turbo.
I was looking at a low profile one that I believe tick performance makes. It's about $1200. So yeah it's pretty dang pricy. I did manage to find some bmw a2a intercoolers that may fit the bill
Old 04-12-2021, 04:25 PM
  #17  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,674
Received 1,113 Likes on 730 Posts

Default

Treadstone intercoolers are nice.



Quick Reply: Intercooled intake manifold question.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.