My new friend Mr Garrett
#24
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The motor ended up at 389 CID 4" bore X 3.875" srtoke. A great historical pontiac number We have Sunoco 94 here so that's what I'm tuning it for, 110 unleaded can be had for those higher boost requirements
1point3liter, I was unaware of this problem, is it a well known issue and do they know the problem? I'd like to look into this before it goes on the car. Thanks for the update.
1point3liter, I was unaware of this problem, is it a well known issue and do they know the problem? I'd like to look into this before it goes on the car. Thanks for the update.
#25
TECH Regular
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warbird
The motor ended up at 389 CID 4" bore X 3.875" srtoke. A great historical pontiac number We have Sunoco 94 here so that's what I'm tuning it for, 110 unleaded can be had for those higher boost requirements
1point3liter, I was unaware of this problem, is it a well known issue and do they know the problem? I'd like to look into this before it goes on the car. Thanks for the update.
1point3liter, I was unaware of this problem, is it a well known issue and do they know the problem? I'd like to look into this before it goes on the car. Thanks for the update.
I would get a tial bov. They are a very nice 50mm valve that vents 360 degree's around. Won't sound ricey like that HKS either.
If you hunt you can find them for around $190
Here's one from my old setup.
#26
Warbird what comp and boost are you looking at starting off (Pump gas)
8.75-9:1 and 12#'s?
Are you going with a front mount cooler? (Where the bumper support is?)
Intercooler placement is going to be critical with your car.
Chris
8.75-9:1 and 12#'s?
Are you going with a front mount cooler? (Where the bumper support is?)
Intercooler placement is going to be critical with your car.
Chris
#27
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chris,
The compression is 9.2:1 on the motor and I'm looking for 14 psi on 94 octane as a starting point. We will keep uping the boost as far as we can go on 110 and see what it makes. The motor is built for it, has 7/16" head and main studs, 75 thou thick ringlands on the pistons and Eagle billet rods so it's plenty strong. Back pressure blows gaskets and lifts heads, with the new full length headers evacuation of exhaust shouldn't be a problem while keeping velocity up to spool the turbo.
The new intercooler is front mounted, longer shorter and thinner than the old one with more surface area for better cooling. Getting air through the rad won't be an issue and it will be mounted further forward as well. I am also running an oil cooler for added protection. Further to that we tightened up the motor tolerance to run lighter oil and maintain pressure.
The compression is 9.2:1 on the motor and I'm looking for 14 psi on 94 octane as a starting point. We will keep uping the boost as far as we can go on 110 and see what it makes. The motor is built for it, has 7/16" head and main studs, 75 thou thick ringlands on the pistons and Eagle billet rods so it's plenty strong. Back pressure blows gaskets and lifts heads, with the new full length headers evacuation of exhaust shouldn't be a problem while keeping velocity up to spool the turbo.
The new intercooler is front mounted, longer shorter and thinner than the old one with more surface area for better cooling. Getting air through the rad won't be an issue and it will be mounted further forward as well. I am also running an oil cooler for added protection. Further to that we tightened up the motor tolerance to run lighter oil and maintain pressure.
#28
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've had 2 of those units pass through me and I have pulled both apart. A GT42R even with the larger 102mm exducer wheel and 53trim your only going to squeeze out about 850-950rwhp at best. The GT42-76R would have been a better choice but its a hybrid unit and not straight from Garrett.
Jose
Jose
#29
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1point3liter,
I'll take a look at the Tial, it was the one I had originally planned on using, but PTE was able to provide all the parts combined for a better price. I'm certainly not closed to the idea of switching.
I'll take a look at the Tial, it was the one I had originally planned on using, but PTE was able to provide all the parts combined for a better price. I'm certainly not closed to the idea of switching.
#31
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JZ 97 SS 1500
I've had 2 of those units pass through me and I have pulled both apart. A GT42R even with the larger 102mm exducer wheel and 53trim your only going to squeeze out about 850-950rwhp at best. The GT42-76R would have been a better choice but its a hybrid unit and not straight from Garrett.
Jose
Jose
The new plumbing will work with both T4 and T6 flanges and support larger turbos for race applications. I'm sure someone will stuff a baby thumper sooner or later
#32
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warbird
I'm sure someone will stuff a baby thumper sooner or later
Just keep your eyes open for some of the newer T-netics units coming.....hehe. .....you guys won't be dissapointed. You didn't think Garrett was going to have all the fun did you?..lol
BTW, be glad you didn't go GT60R, you will never spool it. Heck a GT47-88 compressor wheel weighs ~450 grams, if I can ever find the papers I wrote everything down on to confirm this. The exhaust side was almost double the weight.
http://forcedinductions.com/images/GT4788.jpg
Jose
#33
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
Originally Posted by Warbird
That's right in the upper HP range I'm looking for and that's why we picked the 42R. I know the 76R as well and I also considered the GT60R but those units would put my project in a whole new snack bracket. I have no desire to push a street car over 1000 HP ........................................... yet
The new plumbing will work with both T4 and T6 flanges and support larger turbos for race applications. I'm sure someone will stuff a baby thumper sooner or later
The new plumbing will work with both T4 and T6 flanges and support larger turbos for race applications. I'm sure someone will stuff a baby thumper sooner or later
are they planning on releasing this kit or just an inhouse thing.
and what size is your downpipe going to be?
#34
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I plan to push it, but I'm just trying to be realisitic on the results. I think getting to those kind of stratospheric numbers would be very difficult, but I'll give it a shot I really want to see where it will max out on street gas and what the PCM can do
They are going to release it in kit form and allow DIY types to install it as well. The plan is to have multiple turbo choices. I think they will even sell it as components that you can pick and choose. The intake side is aluminum tubing for lighter weight and the exhaust side is 65 thou thick stainless.
Not sure on the downpipe yet, but I will measure it next week.
They are going to release it in kit form and allow DIY types to install it as well. The plan is to have multiple turbo choices. I think they will even sell it as components that you can pick and choose. The intake side is aluminum tubing for lighter weight and the exhaust side is 65 thou thick stainless.
Not sure on the downpipe yet, but I will measure it next week.