Procharger vs turbo
Spending more for less is a personal choice and a luxury. If it’s in your budget and you want blower noises… more power to ya! No need to ask which is “best” at that point though. Which is best isn’t an opinion, it’s a fact. If the 2 power adders are in a “fight”. The Turbo’s on top every time.
I’ve had turbo and blower cars. Really isn’t even a comparison with cheap turbos these days. I love the sound of an obnoxiously loud blower. I ran the old P600B which I believe was one of the loudest centri blowers. It ran well, and I really liked it. But when a $400 China turbo will make more power per pound, I don’t see how people can afford to not go turbo.
Working on an F1 installation now into Fairmont with a SBF and its been a pain. Had to make room for the 12rib, change accessories, remote mount water pump, etc etc… It nickel and dimes you to death ON TOP of the ridiculous initial cost for the kit. He has a mint into fittings and lines just to remote mount the water pump. It will run really well I’m sure. But its twice the work and 10x the cost of a factory manifold DIY turbo kit…if not more.
Turbo's make more power and make a lot of sense for a street car. He's wrong about turbo's winning every time in racing though because prochargers are doing very well in drag racing these days. Again street cars are different and turbos make a lot of sense. Not sure why the hate for prochargers though they literally install in a day with less under hood heat so they do have their pluses. Nothing about my procharger has made me want to switch. Even with the little D1x it's 9 second capable and with that being the goal of most people with daily drivers it certainly is capable of that even being a smaller quieter blower.
Maybe we just got a dud of a kit, because packaging something like an F1 is much harder than a turbo IMO. Currently helping with an F1 install and it’s been a total nightmare. The SBF kit won’t fit a SBF without a lot of work and additional cost. Gotta add the cost of a nice set of long tube headers in the mix with a blower too.
When I looked briefly, the F1 basic “kit” for an LS is like $6800ish with tax. That’s no IC, fuel system, etc. And the F1’s are rated to like 1050? Assuming that’s crank hp? So that’s about the cheapest he would get away with id guess? I sure wouldn’t run a smaller blower.
What does a 1050 crank HP turbo cost by comparison? Or even 2 small units capable of that power if you wanted a road race car. How much money in heat treatments and additional cooling, ducting, etc could you do with the left over $? For road racing, a small set of nice T3’s could be packaged well with special attention/$ spent on heat evacuation and treatments for less than the cost of the blower I’d think. But again, he is talking a 9 sec drag car.
Still think the only reason to choose a centri-blower is personal preference, but that is a hell of a factor. If you are having a ”VS” debate not based on personal preference. There isn’t much to argue. Of course he could make the goal either way. One way is just less efficient and more money. The owner of the F1 kit we are doing now knows this… he just wanted a big *** blower! So that’s what he’s doing! Not a thing wrong with that. Nice to be different in some ways too.
Last edited by Forcefed86; Mar 1, 2023 at 03:39 PM.
Maybe we just got a dud of a kit, because packaging something like an F1 is much harder than a turbo IMO. Currently helping with an F1 install and it’s been a total nightmare. The SBF kit won’t fit a SBF without a lot of work and additional cost. Gotta add the cost of a nice set of long tube headers in the mix with a blower too.
When I looked briefly, the F1 basic “kit” for an LS is like $6800ish with tax. That’s no IC, fuel system, etc. And the F1’s are rated to like 1050? Assuming that’s crank hp? So that’s about the cheapest he would get away with id guess? I sure wouldn’t run a smaller blower.
What does a 1050 crank HP turbo cost by comparison? Or even 2 small units capable of that power if you wanted a road race car. How much money in heat treatments and additional cooling, ducting, etc could you do with the left over $? For road racing, a small set of nice T3’s could be packaged well with special attention/$ spent on heat evacuation and treatments for less than the cost of the blower I’d think. But again, he is talking a 9 sec drag car.
Still think the only reason to choose a centri-blower is personal preference, but that is a hell of a factor. If you are having a ”VS” debate not based on personal preference. There isn’t much to argue. Of course he could make the goal either way. One way is just less efficient and more money. The owner of the F1 kit we are doing now knows this… he just wanted a big *** blower! So that’s what he’s doing! Not a thing wrong with that. Nice to be different in some ways too.
I never said it couldn’t run a specific ET. I said it wouldn’t do what he wanted. As in… that’s a lot of engine and top end to be looking at a D1x. Or any small belt blower. If you had his engine combo, would you limit yourself with a D1sc knowing what you do now? Or would you jump right into a larger unit? Per Pro Charger the D1sc is for engines with 350-500NA crank HP. A nice 10.5:1 LS3 with great heads will far exceed that in my experience.
Positive displacement blowers and a centri blowers are very different animals. Not even on the same playing field. As mentioned, the reason you don’t see turbos in top fuel or the other classes you are mentioning are because the NHRA doesn’t allow it. They don’t want the cars any faster. Banks built a turbo top fuel years back and it made so much more power it destroyed the typical nitro car drivetrain, though the engine held up. They would have needed to redesign the entire driveline and clutches to handle the power. Also kinda interesting it not only made more power, it made power sooner.
F1a-94 street car trapping over 180 mph
D1x making over 1000 rwhp
Yes everyone knows turbos make more power, but Prochargers aren’t as incapable as what is being portrayed in this thread.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Reference what I said above, typical newer gen procharger kits on C7s and Camaros bolts on in 5-6 hours.
F1A-94 is pretty typical on 1000+ rwhp builds and we've made 1200 with it.
It's not all about the money spent on something, sometimes it's the amount of time and fab required and the goals. Otherwise everybody would just buy a couple of cheap chinese turbos and cut up an old piece of **** tin can and shove em in. In my case it's because you can't package a turbo setup in the engine bay of a Corvette and not have other issues to contend with, and the same goes for plenty of other cars.
I guess if you ignore everything that has already been said then sure.
The F1 kits made to bolt directly on to the 2017-2021 Camaros are over 12k. More for the corvettes. But the OP isn’t running that platform so I don’t see how the installation time for something like that is relevant to his VS post on an Fbody? There is plenty of room in an Fbody. I guess if you spend a mint on your car that’s not a crazy option. But to the masses, that’s not exactly economical. The base 6-7k kits require accessory changes, WP relocation, etc… That’s what I was bringing up as I’m going through it now. That’s not ignoring anything anyone said. Its relevant to what the guy is wanting to do. Road race cars, corvettes, and 12k kits aren't IMO.
The F1 kits made to bolt directly on to the 2017-2021 Camaros are over 12k. More for the corvettes. But the OP isn’t running that platform so I don’t see how the installation time for something like that is relevant to his VS post on an Fbody? There is plenty of room in an Fbody. I guess if you spend a mint on your car that’s not a crazy option. But to the masses, that’s not exactly economical. The base 6-7k kits require accessory changes, WP relocation, etc… That’s what I was bringing up as I’m going through it now. That’s not ignoring anything anyone said. Its relevant to what the guy is wanting to do. Road race cars, corvettes, and 12k kits aren't IMO.

So if your goal is truly a street car that is 9 second capable then yes a D1x fits the bill very well and will probably make 15 psi peak without over spinning it on his combo. If he actually has long term goals of wanting more while keeping it a street car the F1a-94 is a very nice blower. Loss of a little low end isn't a bad thing when you have 377+ cubes high compression and make over 1000 rwhp on small tires with a street car. Most turbo guys use tuning to limit power down low anyway where with a procharger it's just a little timing adjustment as the power is linear anyway. Installs in a day if you buy a kit made for your car and racing is expensive I've seen plenty of turbo builds with way more money in them then I have in my car, but hey I'm all in favor of capitalism and respect all combos. I actually prefer big cubic inch high compression nitrous combos for the sound, but it's just hard to compete with those combo's now unless you are super light. They also still have more wear and tear to deal with.
Last edited by ddnspider; Mar 2, 2023 at 03:52 PM.
Maybe we just got a dud of a kit, because packaging something like an F1 is much harder than a turbo IMO. Currently helping with an F1 install and it’s been a total nightmare. The SBF kit won’t fit a SBF without a lot of work and additional cost. Gotta add the cost of a nice set of long tube headers in the mix with a blower too.
When I looked briefly, the F1 basic “kit” for an LS is like $6800ish with tax. That’s no IC, fuel system, etc. And the F1’s are rated to like 1050? Assuming that’s crank hp? So that’s about the cheapest he would get away with id guess? I sure wouldn’t run a smaller blower.
What does a 1050 crank HP turbo cost by comparison? Or even 2 small units capable of that power if you wanted a road race car. How much money in heat treatments and additional cooling, ducting, etc could you do with the left over $? For road racing, a small set of nice T3’s could be packaged well with special attention/$ spent on heat evacuation and treatments for less than the cost of the blower I’d think. But again, he is talking a 9 sec drag car.
Still think the only reason to choose a centri-blower is personal preference, but that is a hell of a factor. If you are having a ”VS” debate not based on personal preference. There isn’t much to argue. Of course he could make the goal either way. One way is just less efficient and more money. The owner of the F1 kit we are doing now knows this… he just wanted a big *** blower! So that’s what he’s doing! Not a thing wrong with that. Nice to be different in some ways too.
I never said it couldn’t run a specific ET. I said it wouldn’t do what he wanted. As in… that’s a lot of engine and top end to be looking at a D1x. Or any small belt blower. If you had his engine combo, would you limit yourself with a D1sc knowing what you do now? Or would you jump right into a larger unit? Per Pro Charger the D1sc is for engines with 350-500NA crank HP. A nice 10.5:1 LS3 with great heads will far exceed that in my experience.
Positive displacement blowers and a centri blowers are very different animals. Not even on the same playing field. As mentioned, the reason you don’t see turbos in top fuel or the other classes you are mentioning are because the NHRA doesn’t allow it. They don’t want the cars any faster. rBanks built a turbo top fuel years back and it made so much more power it destroyed the typical nitro car drivetrain, though the engine held up. They would have needed to redesign the entire driveline and clutches to handle the power. Also kinda interesting it not only made more power, it made power soone.
Very interesting, did not know that.















