STS Turbos-How Many
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...21#post2777621
I'm going to post how I modded the oil return too, so it doesn't have to go into the oil fill cap...
I'll come back and add that link in a minute. (after I make the post...)

Okay - here's the oil return post with pics:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...70#post2777770
Last edited by John_D.; Apr 17, 2005 at 09:55 PM.
You seem to have a fixation with things up the rear. Did you drop the soap too many times with daddy?
Your internet keyboard ***** do not impress me little man. Take them out of your mouth.
You were asked to stay out nicely. Start a new thread if you want. Slam STS all you want in it. You had no reason whatsever to post in this thread other than to start ****.
Admins... please just erase all the babble and leave the thread. It was honestly one of the first STS threads that made it to page 3 before someone had to go and screw with it.
Thanks.
Somebody get this man a bottle of KY before he goes nutz!
a) A dumb idea.
b) Not as good as they are portrayed here on the forums.
I never said they were not "performers", or that they did not produce some kind of results. I am merely stating that I do not like the idea of a rear mounted turbo.
Do you think if you fart into your STS charge pipe, it will make more HP? Perhaps get you into 10s? You know that methane injection is an option for the kit. That must be what gives it the edge...cuz it seems like most people who like STS are fulla sheeeeyt. hahaha

I can appreciate your opinion but am curious as to what evidence you base your decision on. You state that they are a "dumb idea"; why is this? You also state that you do not believe that they are "as good as they are portrayed here on the forums.". What experience led you to this conclusion? How much experience do you have with turbos and turbocharged cars? As for the propane injection maybe you should do a little research on the subject before you go making fun of it as your above post leads one to believe that you are not adequatley educated regarding rear mounted turbos or any other type of automotive turbo setup. You may think that it is funny to trash and berate the people here but think about this; I truly hope you are as intelligent as you would lead others to believe as you may find yourself needing help from the same people that you seem to take pleasure in harassing. When that happens you may find only your rants and insults there to help you in your time of need. At any rate good luck and as always; Cheers !!!
Jim C.
PS - A small bit of info for yourself and others. Most of the time when someone comes along with an idea that is "outside the box" they are usually ridiculed. This has been true throughout history with many types of technology. However, one must keep in mind that theoretical physics and applied physics can be two totally different animals and in this case there are WAY to many varibles to make a decision that is based on anything other than experience. So if one would like to debunk these kits buy one, use it and then point out the flaws to me. Until then I will continue to watch and decide for myself whether or not to purchase one.
J
I'm glad there is a cheapo option for turbo FI, but I would probably stick with a more traditional install where the turbo is in the engine bay. If STS's "put the turbo in the car's ***" idea was so great, I am sure someone would have thought of it by now. It's not that innovative...people have been relocating stuff like oil filters, batteries, fuel tanks, etc for years. I'm sure on more than one occassion someone said "Hey, lets' put the turbo in the trunk"...but it never caught on. I wonder why...
I do acknowledge that the kit DOES work and CAN provide somewhat impressive performance, however most of the impressive #'s are not coming from STS-only cars. They are coming from cars that are built up all-around, thereby being somewhat misleading to people who think they can drop $4K on the kit and have a car that runs 10s. Add to that the fact that I DO NOT like the rear mount configuration, and that's is personal preference that will not change regardless of how well the kit is purported to function.
I do not have the kit, hence what I am stating is my OPINION. And "Wildman" who also has not used the kit but has purchased it is most likely defending it cuz he doesn't want to second guess his decision to drop some $4K+ on the kit when for a little more than 1/2 that price he could have got a Phamspeed turbo kit with FMIC - a kit that will probably work a lot better and produce superior results.
I probably would have found a way around them and bought the Phamspeed instead of my STS if it had been out at the time but it wasn't.
Quite happy with my STS though thus far.
Probably because I am not a track guy. All I want is an extremely quick street car and that's what I have. I can only imagine when I crank up the boost a bit. The way the power is delivered, this kit at 5.5psi "feels" every bit as strong as my procharger did at 10psi.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Got it working and got some BIG plans for it! 15lbs and some 13s in a 5500lb SUV...
overall...... diggin it so far.
having people's heads whip around when they hear it whistle down the street and realize it's turbocharged is priceless
Not bad for a 5.3L with a cam and stock 6.0L heads.
Not bad for a 5.3L with a cam and stock 6.0L heads.



