ATI Procharger first ... any regrets?
Has anyone here done the same thing, who does or does not regret it? Remember, this dude has no money in sight to EVER upgrade his vehicle. I think the guy who sold it to him just wanted to dump it on him and told him he'd see AT LEAST an additional 130+ RWHP on his stock vehicle. Could it be that there is something wrong with the installation or with the SC itself? I'd like to give him words of encouragement, however, I previously had eccommended he do bolt-on's (at least exhaust), first. Now, I feel bad about telling him that.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Cheers,
Mark
On a bone-stock engine (36# Inj, In-line Aeromotive Fuel pump) I made 405 RWHP / 425 RWTQ at 5 PSI with the Procharger D-1SC. It knocked almost a second and a half of my 1/4 mile ET and added 10 MPH to the trap speed.
I added headers, 42# inj and went to 486 RWHP 487 RWTQ, 9.5 to 10 PSI. It would run low 11's all day long and I even broke into the 10's once (a best of 10.98 @ 125.83 MPH).
If you have an automatic, a stall converter, IMO, is the single most cost effective mod you can make.
I would say about 50% of the do-it-yourself supercharger folks that come through our door put out sub-par numbers because something on the kit needs addressed: fuel system too small, belts slipping, springs floating, crank bolt spinning off, poor tune, etc...
Last edited by TWS; Dec 29, 2004 at 12:29 AM.
Talking bone stock ONLY .... this guy can't even buy a few dyno pulls. I felt so bad for him that I wanted to shell out $500 for HP Tuners just to help him out. The guy who sold him the SC told him he would see awesome gains ... with SC only ... even toild the guy he wouldn't need a tune or anything else.




