Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Boost Limit Reached on 10:1 Compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2005, 11:47 AM
  #41  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,718
Received 1,167 Likes on 759 Posts

Default

I believe that 900rwhp is possible with 93 pump gas and no meth.

An 8:1 540bbc + a2w, etc.., should make huge power.

Your goal of 1100rwhp with 93 pump gas is interesting, and I look forward to reading about your progress over the next 12 months. I'd plan for 96lb injectors I think.
Old 05-16-2005, 12:12 PM
  #42  
9 Second Club
 
Nickn20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
i run a single 3.5" downpipe before the 4" muffler.. the downpipe has a 3" flange at the beginning of it. i'm fairly certain ive heard of over 1krwhp being pushed through a 3" flange before.. not to say that it was the most efficient way to get there.

not saying it cant be done or hasn't or it wont run, but I do beleive there is a gain in power to be had going to a bigger exhaust.

question for you, where is your wastegate bypassing to? atmosphere or the down pipe? turbos are slightly different than a blown app. all in all I think we are on the same page though
Old 05-16-2005, 01:12 PM
  #43  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Got Me SOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 6,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I was gonna rip the block apart I would lower the compression more than a half point, you are probably not going to see any gains with a half point drop. Drop it to 8:1 and run 21 psi, that should be fun.

Look forward to seeing you run your car at the strip.
Old 05-17-2005, 10:51 PM
  #44  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bryan Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
John Meaney's C4 is like a 400ci aluminum smallblock with twin turbos. I know very little about the car, but it's around 8:1. Car goes 135mph on pump gas and 160mph on race gas (C16).

When your IATs get high, 150+, you have to back the timing down.

Bryan, I am making 21.5 psi and am not lifting heads. Harlan made like 1000 crank with ARP head studs and a hydraulic cam...

It's your car but Brady has gone like high 8's on 93 pump, and I thought he said he was using less than 10 degrees of timing... wow.
Perhaps that is the key here. Maybe lowering the timimg a couple more degrees, would help the situation. Just remember, You are not running 10:1 and neither is Harlan. That is definately part of the problem here. I have the absolute best parts money can buy from that standpoint. I believe you could run 30psi as long as the Compression Ratio was lowered.

Some sort of cooling is needed. I just dont want to use anything that I have to put in the flow. NOS on the IC, or a C02 pipe on the intake side. I am not seeing any detonation or knock, so I can only assume that cylinder pressure casused the gasket to give way.

according to JE Pistons, They are telling me with a 4.00 inch crank, and 6.125" rods, on a 4.127 diameter cylinder, 9.5:1 is the lowest compression that I can have. If any pistons experts reading this have any other suggestions I am all ears. I am taking JE at their word, but I am also open to options.

If anyone else is reading this, read the specs above before jumping on me.
Old 05-18-2005, 05:36 AM
  #45  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Bryan Wilkinson
according to JE Pistons, They are telling me with a 4.00 inch crank, and 6.125" rods, on a 4.127 diameter cylinder, 9.5:1 is the lowest compression that I can have. If any pistons experts reading this have any other suggestions I am all ears. I am taking JE at their word, but I am also open to options.

If anyone else is reading this, read the specs above before jumping on me.
i wouldnt take them at their word if they told you that, unless there talking with shelf pistons. What dish pistons would make the 9.5 CR.
plush you can always increase the chamber of the head or add a thicker gasket, if that fails switch to a shorter rod.
Old 05-19-2005, 03:56 PM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
blackz93's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: nc
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So Bryan, did it blow the gasket, or just lift the head?
Old 05-19-2005, 04:29 PM
  #47  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,718
Received 1,167 Likes on 759 Posts

Default

Or did it burn the gasket.
Old 05-19-2005, 04:33 PM
  #48  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

i melted aluminum out of my head before i burned through the steel gasket.
Old 05-19-2005, 05:13 PM
  #49  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bryan Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by smokinHawk
i wouldnt take them at their word if they told you that, unless there talking with shelf pistons. What dish pistons would make the 9.5 CR.
plush you can always increase the chamber of the head or add a thicker gasket, if that fails switch to a shorter rod.
The dish is -29cc, and the chamber in the head is 72cc. 9.5:1.

What everyone seems to be missing here, like with Johns statement, sure with 8:1 CR I could run 30psi and not lift the heads. So could Harlan. Plus with the LS6 heads, these are not optimal for blown applications because they can move due to the thin deck. thats why AFR's have a thicker deck.

There is a potential problem here with the 427, and any experts on the site can pitch in, with a 427, and a 4.00" stroke, piston speed in increased. So it is important to keep the rod length as long as possible and in this case is 6.125". So with a 4.00" stroke, and 6.125" rods, I am being told that 9.5:1 is the absolute lowest CR that I can go with the 427 block. That is via the piston, This was a custom built piston, that is 4.127". The design went through their engineering dept. My guess is JE probably knows what they are doing.

Notice that everyone else here without a 427 has a shorter stroke, thus more room so even with a 6.125" rod you can get 8:1cr.

Now with the new heads, they just got the castings back, and with the thick deck on the bottom of the head, 5/8", they think they can go to 76cc in the head. The concern is the shape of the chamber and will it promote an efficient burn process.

Perhaps I would have been better to go with a 350CI instead of a 427 with a 3.00 inch stroke.
Old 05-19-2005, 05:14 PM
  #50  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bryan Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
i melted aluminum out of my head before i burned through the steel gasket.
That's what Im talking about, Git -r- done!!!!!!!
Old 05-19-2005, 05:29 PM
  #51  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,718
Received 1,167 Likes on 759 Posts

Default

Yes, that 4.000 stroke does make piston selection more complicated.
Old 05-19-2005, 05:51 PM
  #52  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
rons 00z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

have you experimented with ceramic coatings at all?
heres a link that give their explanation about why and all that
http://www.swaintech.com/autolc.html

deffinatly keep it up it's an awsome goal.
Old 05-19-2005, 06:12 PM
  #53  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
LTLHOMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I see lots of these once you take that thing to the track:



It's a good thing you're in it for the dyno glory, because if you were racing, you'd need spare motors for each pass. I'd elaborate but you wouldn't listen anyways.

I will give Bryan one thing though...he's proved that you actually spend more trying to build a pump gas motor (which is supposed to save money I guess???) than just buying the damn c16 in the first place and making the motor live.
Old 05-19-2005, 06:30 PM
  #54  
TECH Enthusiast
 
S_J_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Downers Grove,IL
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bryan Wilkinson,
You are so dead set on this pump gas thing you are getting lost in your own fog.
Cylinder pressure is HP! , unless it is uncontrollable pressure spikes from detonation.

Lowering compression and raising boost to make more power, would mean MORE cylinder pressure.
And I do not think you are anywhere near the absolute mechanical power limit of these motors.

You certainly may very well have found the limit for pump gas at 10.0-1. And I am amzed you have gone that far, but to much cylinder pressure is not the limit. Octane tolerance is.

I would suggest you use a good engine simulator to understand this better in your power quest. Check out how the B.M.E.P. changes as you raise and lower compression and add or subtract boost.

Steve
Old 05-19-2005, 07:33 PM
  #55  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
rons 00z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

how much power do guys make for the pump gas drags?
Old 05-19-2005, 08:00 PM
  #56  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,718
Received 1,167 Likes on 759 Posts

Default

Ron, when you consider the power level of the PGD cars, also factor in their raceweight. A number of those cars were <3000 raceweight I would guess.
Old 05-19-2005, 08:13 PM
  #57  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
69firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hurst tx
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yep, they are some bad *** cars thats for sure

id bet most of those are race cars made to drive on the street, not the other way around.
Old 05-19-2005, 09:17 PM
  #58  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
rons 00z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Ron, when you consider the power level of the PGD cars, also factor in their raceweight. A number of those cars were <3000 raceweight I would guess.

thats true but powerwise say at the crank shouldnt change because of the weight. after all he is talking about HP and not timeslips. but yes if his car weighed as much as a PGD car i think he would beable to hold his own as long as he can drive like those guys.
Old 05-19-2005, 10:12 PM
  #59  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,718
Received 1,167 Likes on 759 Posts

Default

I bet Bryan is more like 3700 raceweight, maybre 3800. Makes a difference.
Old 05-19-2005, 10:26 PM
  #60  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
nitrorocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bryan, There should really be no difference between a sbc and an ls1 as far as piston in your case. My last 421 had the same bore and stroke as you. When Monty went from 11.25:1 to 8.5:1 compression, he used JE pistons. My point is they HAVE to make them. I would try calling around also.

Wiseco makes a piston!!!

K397A125 has a 32 cc dish! Try that out on your compression calculator!

(PAGE # 8)
http://www.wiseco.com/PDFcatalogs/AB05_chevy.pdf

I think the rep at J.E. was smokin' something. I am sure if you check around, you can even find a larger dish then 32cc with a custom piston.


Quick Reply: Boost Limit Reached on 10:1 Compression



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 PM.