Charger or Turbo?
Check out the Corvette above. Installing an ATI ProCharger is typically much easier than installing a turbocharger, with very good results. Bob
Turbos have their advantages but I would take a supercharger over a turbo at what most people run for boost on a stock engine..
At higher boost levels on modified engines the drive belt systems need to get bigger as doest the thrust generated on the crank.. Then I would go to a properly size matched turbo due to the ability to maintain a higher boost pressure more efficiently.
With near stock cars the lower boost levels combined with easy of installation make me suggest the supercharger.
I drive one turbo car with high boost (in the 30's psi) its been gone thru from the pan to the throttle body and beyond...
Check out the Corvette above. Installing an ATI ProCharger is typically much easier than installing a turbocharger, with very good results. Bob
man... that is nice.. i have looked at that same procharger.. a vortech supercharger... a magnuson.. and the guy that put the cam/heads in my car has a vette with a rear mount turbo he built himself.. i dont know anything about it, but he says he will put the same unit in mine for 6500$ any thoughts on that? also.. i like the sound of the turbo better.. and i dont want the car to be loud as hell at idle or when im cruising.. any ideas ?
yea... i still got about a year till i can do that anyway.. i need a torque converter next.. damn.. i dont want to wait!
oh well.. ill have the turbo before i die.. that is for sure! lol..
BTW... who is making the new twin setups for the vette? and does anyone know which company or w/e has a rear mount setup for sale? or is there even a rear mount yet for a vette.. who knows.. 
