Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

383 ci & TTI Street Kit, good combo or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2005, 12:01 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

2 reasons why I thought about having a 383 was:

- Cool factor of a stroked turbo car
- Make more power without taxing the turbo kit as much by running less boost
Old 09-07-2005, 12:31 PM
  #22  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,599
Received 1,741 Likes on 1,300 Posts

Default

i consider the "cool factor" more of a bonus,the extra cubes SHOULD help the turbo spool faster as well as give you more area under the curve.And a 383 would help put a bigger turbo in more of the efficiency range.i say if u wanna do it go for it and see what happens,but i wouldnt recommend log manifolds though.
Old 09-07-2005, 02:33 PM
  #23  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ahwatukee, Az
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i say go for it. this way, you have a stroked motor that would be ready for an upgrade if you decide to ditch the log manifolds for a tubular setup down the road.
Old 09-07-2005, 02:48 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
libertine1015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Detroit area, MI
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You could always go the Stainless Works route put a kit together and save some money, if so let me know. I have a TTi street kit intercooler for cheap.

I love My TTi kit (most of the time). Its been very reliable, its all the other crap that keeps breaking
Old 09-08-2005, 06:07 AM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
if they made a 346 iron block i would have taken it over the 6L.
Dave they do silly. just take a 5.3 block and bore it out to 3.90" been done alot, NBM00ws6 just sold his last month that he used with his procharger (reckless' old engine he built), or like Kurts destroked 6.0 to get around 352 cubes with a large bore, short stroke maid for spinning those high rpms that turbos love so well.

Originally Posted by Billiumss
Last time I checked, you can't use knock sensors on a LS2 block with a LS1 computer, I tuned (3) 427 LS2 C5s and they don't use knock sensors.

550 RWHP is what I would like to have but just looking at all the options out there. I figure run less boost with more cubes. What's worse for the log manifold kit, more boost or more cubes? I just want the kit to last a very long time, so that is most important to me.

What question do I keep asking? This is the 1st time I asked about using a 383 with this kit...
i was sure you could attach the ls1 knock sensors to the ls2 block wither in the new knock sensor location or the extra motormount location, something like that, and it worked fine, i could be wrong though.

that kit will EASILY put down 550rwhp on pump gas with a set of decent heads, low CR (around 9.0), good cam and 10psi

dont do big cubes on that kit, it isnt needed nor will it work well with the system it will have bad exhaust modjo.
Old 09-08-2005, 04:27 PM
  #26  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
gillbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by smokinHawk
i was sure you could attach the ls1 knock sensors to the ls2 block wither in the new knock sensor location or the extra motormount location, something like that, and it worked fine, i could be wrong though.
I had the same impression.
Old 09-08-2005, 07:21 PM
  #27  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Exclamation

Originally Posted by gillbot
I had the same impression.
Nope....

Just because they can screw in doesn't mean they will work properly.

You have to remember, the placement of the LS1 knocks sensors were calibrated in the postion under the valley cover.

The only way it will work is if someone that has a lot of time and money to run a LS2 block on a engine dyno for countless hours to get it right instead of guessing, using knock sensors on a LS2 block and using a LS1 computer will never happen.
Old 09-08-2005, 08:29 PM
  #28  
TECH Resident
 
V8_DSM_V8again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would run the stock stroke or less stroke...

For a turbo street car its the best bet.. On the low end you will likely have problems hooking up with either displacement engine. You will pull harder on the top end with the smaller stroke. You will get much better MPG with the smaller engine off the boost and it will also live alot longer given the same quality of pistons, rods, rings and other bottom end components.

I spend the money on big stuff 3 with wideband, fuel system, intercooler, etc not on increasing displacement. You will gain alot consistency, efficiency, longevity and more thru the use of a potent engine management system.

Also in regards to displacement. Do you want to hand the viper his butt and have him say it was a LS1 stroker that beat him or a stock displacement?

I'm building for efficiency.. Its ~327 or ~302 for displacement. Then VE mods on top of a good turbo system. Porting, valve upgrades, cam, SMIM etc....
Old 09-08-2005, 08:47 PM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

...sorta like the Buick GN's huh
Old 09-08-2005, 08:52 PM
  #30  
TECH Resident
 
V8_DSM_V8again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.scegaskets.com/news/ics-t...horsepower.htm

Hey check out this Ken D 286 Cu inch... About 1833hp at 9400 rpm..
Old 09-08-2005, 08:58 PM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

...damn!
Old 09-08-2005, 09:10 PM
  #32  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
BlackCamaroSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Smyrna, DE
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by V8_DSM_V8again
I would run the stock stroke or less stroke...

For a turbo street car its the best bet.. On the low end you will likely have problems hooking up with either displacement engine. You will pull harder on the top end with the smaller stroke. You will get much better MPG with the smaller engine off the boost and it will also live alot longer given the same quality of pistons, rods, rings and other bottom end components.
Can you please explain all of this in more detail because i was thinking of getting a 408 turbo'ed setup but this make me think...do you have AIM or anything where i can contact you??
Old 09-08-2005, 09:14 PM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlackCamaroSS02
Can you please explain all of this in more detail because i was thinking of getting a 408 turbo'ed setup but this make me think...do you have AIM or anything where i can contact you??
ditto on that ****, group discussion on that, count me in on the AIM convorsation!
Old 09-08-2005, 09:16 PM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
 
mahhddgtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

V8_DSMs building an efficient motor, but wouldn't he have to rev it a good bit to see all that power he's going to make?

P.S. Post the AIM convo

Last edited by mahhddgtp; 09-08-2005 at 09:23 PM.
Old 09-08-2005, 09:36 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

relpyin to it right now
Old 09-08-2005, 09:39 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
BlackCamaroSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Smyrna, DE
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hahaha sweet we are all tracking V8_DSM_V8again LOL
Old 09-08-2005, 09:42 PM
  #37  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

lol keep refreshing waiting for his explenation.
Old 09-08-2005, 10:00 PM
  #38  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
BlackCamaroSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Smyrna, DE
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

He logged off
Old 09-08-2005, 10:27 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
 
mahhddgtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

We've Been Ripped!
Old 09-09-2005, 05:20 AM
  #40  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
gillbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Billiumss
Nope....

Just because they can screw in doesn't mean they will work properly.

You have to remember, the placement of the LS1 knocks sensors were calibrated in the postion under the valley cover.

The only way it will work is if someone that has a lot of time and money to run a LS2 block on a engine dyno for countless hours to get it right instead of guessing, using knock sensors on a LS2 block and using a LS1 computer will never happen.
I still say using them in a location other than originally intended is better than not running them at all. I know there are people out there doing it now.


Quick Reply: 383 ci & TTI Street Kit, good combo or not?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.