Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2002, 02:56 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
tbyrne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mass
Posts: 8,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

<img src="http://www.tbyrne.com/projectls1_files/newprojectls12.jpg" alt=" - " />

I haven't posted anything about the car in awhile. This is mainly due to the fact that I haven't been to enthused about the numbers but things are starting to pick up. Today's pull produced 672.9hp at about 5800 and 618.6 ft-lb torque at 5200. One restriction that I see is the exhaust flowing through a 2.5" Y-pipe. That will be replaced with a 3" this week and then we can see about getting into the 700+ range.

A quick rundown on the car -

ARE 409 stroker motor topped with a set of Stage II LS6 heads and an LS6 intake. Internal components include - Ross pistons (8.9:1 compression), Lunati crank, rods and cam (.556/.578 112)

ATI F1 supercharger making about 18# of boost

1 3/4" TTS long tube headers with a 2 1/2" Y-pipe and a Corsa exhaust

4L60E with a Vigilante 3500 converter

Future upgrades include a larger cam and possibly tapping into the bottle that is mounted in the back.

Tom

<small>[ July 27, 2002, 02:57 PM: Message edited by: tbyrne ]</small>
Old 07-27-2002, 04:51 PM
  #2  
Moderator
 
Black LS1 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

GREAT work, Tom!

Let me ask a question... why 112 LSA? Wouldn't a wider LSA help the boosted motor a bit? Or does it not matter for the configuration you put together?

I'm not being smarta$$... with my limited knowledge, I just gathered that from all the discussion going around.

Thanks, man. And again, I LIKE those numbers! That's about my target. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Old 07-27-2002, 05:57 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
jleews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: roanoke virginia
Posts: 1,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

WOW <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> Tom i thought 630 was incredible when i wached that the other day now i see this.Remember the other day when i said you have allmost double the power that i have?Well now you really do.Anyone who has not seen this car will be shocked when you do because not only does it make crazy power but it is absolutley beautiful{good job Tom}. Just think if it was a stick it would probly make 800 rw.
Old 07-27-2002, 05:58 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
Krazy98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fall River, MA
Posts: 3,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

Tom awesome numbers. My cousin told me. Good for you your almost there. get a hold of me because I want to pick up those parts. I emailed you thursday night I guess you never got it. No big deal. Maybe I can come by or meet you somewhere for them let me know.Congrads on the new numbers.

Marco
Old 07-27-2002, 06:12 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Malicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by jleews6:
<strong>WOW <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> Tom i thought 630 was incredible when i wached that the other day now i see this.Remember the other day when i said you have allmost double the power that i have?Well now you really do.Anyone who has not seen this car will be shocked when you do because not only does it make crazy power but it is absolutley beautiful{good job Tom}. Just think if it was a stick it would probly make 800 rw.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
Call me stupid if I'm wrong, but I don't think a stick would change the rwhp rating of his car?
Old 07-27-2002, 06:30 PM
  #6  
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
XLR8NSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Posts: 21,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

A manual transmission is more efficient and will let more power make it to the rear wheels.

One person recently dynoed his car with a 4L60E automatic(locked converter) then switched it out for a 6speed and dynoed ~25+ more rwhp.

Tom, get that little y-pipe off there. That should really wake things up. Actually, I'm surprised it hasn't blown itself off. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Do you think a set of bigger 1 7/8" headers would help? Also do you think a new intake manifold might help?

Tom, when that 4L60E blows up <img border="0" alt="[devil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" /> why don't you put in a TH350 with a gear vendors OD unit. Then you could sell a conversion kit. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

Good work. Congratulations on that beast. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />

John
Old 07-27-2002, 07:17 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Malicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

Got ya, was wrong about the actually dyno higher on the manual, but you think it'd make that much of a difference? Almost 130 horse different?
Old 07-27-2002, 08:39 PM
  #8  
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
XLR8NSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Posts: 21,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Malicious:
<strong>Got ya, was wrong about the actually dyno higher on the manual, but you think it'd make that much of a difference? Almost 130 horse different?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">No, I don't think it would make that big a difference. I think each transmission eats a certain fixed amount of power not a percentage like is always talked about. IMO <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

John
Old 07-28-2002, 02:18 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
jleews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: roanoke virginia
Posts: 1,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

I would put money on it that it would make 750 with a stick.But what do i know? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Old 07-28-2002, 04:34 AM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: san diego ca
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

Very impressive, and the car is looking very good, as always - keep up the good work! <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />

WHO WILL BE THE FIRST TO BREAK THE MAGIC 1,0000 HP BARRIER???

the world wonders
Old 07-28-2002, 06:04 AM
  #11  
Teching In
 
CJP63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: rehoboth M.A.
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

Hey marco, did you use to own a black mustang?Carl
Old 07-28-2002, 07:32 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
MelloYellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Centrifugal City
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

I was curious why the 112LSA also?
Old 07-28-2002, 09:51 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
tbyrne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mass
Posts: 8,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

I originally didn't plan on going with a supercharger this big when the motor was built last year. ARE recommended this cam when everything went together.

The car would probably dyno in the 705hp range if it was a 6 speed. The 4L60E isn't the most efficient tranny out there <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

Tom
Old 07-29-2002, 04:47 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
SS00Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

A full 3" Y w/RT cats, 1 7/8" Grots and a wide open borla will get you 50 hp, I'm guessing.

Good job, Tom. I'm still showing your license plate frame on my car. It may not impress now at 12.20/114, but when the stage II LS1M T63 goes on, it should raise some eyebrows...

S-
Old 07-29-2002, 04:48 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

Great numbers!!
I think a 1 7/8 header and 3 inch Ypipe would make a world of difference! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Congrats again,
Chris
Old 07-29-2002, 05:24 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
tbyrne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mass
Posts: 8,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

I was also thinking about some 1 7/8" headers. They would really help the big horsepower cars.

Tom
Old 07-29-2002, 08:37 PM
  #17  
Launching!
 
Vortech396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Plymouth,MA
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

Tom,
Congrats on the super numbers. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<img border="0" alt="[Camaro]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" />
Good luck with the new motor.
seeya
John
Old 07-29-2002, 10:37 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
 
zturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

for that kind of power that you are pushing i would almost take a look at 1 7/8-2" <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> step header. You can cram all the air in you are gonna need it is just getting that stuff out of there. On a motor making that kind of power I would have to think there is a huge bottle neck in your y as people have said.
Steven
Old 07-29-2002, 11:53 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

why not open headers? i know it will help out that FI motor!
Old 07-30-2002, 12:59 AM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
 
TrahnZam WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston / Dallas
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Dave:
<strong>Very impressive, and the car is looking very good, as always - keep up the good work! <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />

WHO WILL BE THE FIRST TO BREAK THE MAGIC 1,0000 HP BARRIER???

the world wonders</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Already been broken. www.hphero.com I think.

Tom: Get some better headers and a dual 3" exhaust setup with an X-pipe, I bet that would show a great gain!


Quick Reply: Dyno numbers so far - 672.9hp/618.6 torque



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.