et's with an ATI ProCharger
#2
Moderator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Fayetteville Motor Sports Park (Great Track Prep, BFG DR's and minimal spinning!)
AFTER ATI/GWP Stage II D1SC Procharger, 36# Injectors, 5 PSI
Quickest 1/8th & 1/4-Mile ET
1.72 60'
4.93 330'
7.63 1/8 ET
91.00 1/8 MPH
11.92 1/4 ET
115.32 1/4 MPH
(Again, great Track prep. But, couldn't HELP but spin some, or feather it off the line)
AFTER ATI/GWP Stage II D1SC Procharger, 36# Injectors, 10 PSI
Quickest 1/8th & 1/4-Mile ET
7.07 1/8 ET
99.49 1/8 MPH
10.98 1/4 ET
125.83 1/4 MPH
Fastest 1/8th & 1/4-Mile MPH
7.20 1/8 ET
99.51 1/8 MPH
11.11 1/4 ET
126.05 1/4 MPH
Dyno Before Procharger (SY3500 Stall and 3.73's)
http://blackls1ta.com/dyno_296_hp.htm
Dyno After GWP Stage II ATI Procharger D-1SC and MAC Headers/Y-Pipe
http://blackls1ta.com/dyno_486_hp.htm
My first verson of the GWP Stage II was sort of like a better tune-able Stage I that was supersafe. Performance results are about what you'd get from the base ATI unit, but the FMU can be a headache.
Not being satisfied, I stepped up to the original intent of the GWP Stage II (minus the head/cam factor) with a smaller pulley, larger injectors and headers and ran the 10.98 @ 125.83 MPH on stock internals.
Hope that helps...
AFTER ATI/GWP Stage II D1SC Procharger, 36# Injectors, 5 PSI
Quickest 1/8th & 1/4-Mile ET
1.72 60'
4.93 330'
7.63 1/8 ET
91.00 1/8 MPH
11.92 1/4 ET
115.32 1/4 MPH
(Again, great Track prep. But, couldn't HELP but spin some, or feather it off the line)
AFTER ATI/GWP Stage II D1SC Procharger, 36# Injectors, 10 PSI
Quickest 1/8th & 1/4-Mile ET
7.07 1/8 ET
99.49 1/8 MPH
10.98 1/4 ET
125.83 1/4 MPH
Fastest 1/8th & 1/4-Mile MPH
7.20 1/8 ET
99.51 1/8 MPH
11.11 1/4 ET
126.05 1/4 MPH
Dyno Before Procharger (SY3500 Stall and 3.73's)
http://blackls1ta.com/dyno_296_hp.htm
Dyno After GWP Stage II ATI Procharger D-1SC and MAC Headers/Y-Pipe
http://blackls1ta.com/dyno_486_hp.htm
My first verson of the GWP Stage II was sort of like a better tune-able Stage I that was supersafe. Performance results are about what you'd get from the base ATI unit, but the FMU can be a headache.
Not being satisfied, I stepped up to the original intent of the GWP Stage II (minus the head/cam factor) with a smaller pulley, larger injectors and headers and ran the 10.98 @ 125.83 MPH on stock internals.
Hope that helps...
#3
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Get both!
MMS is putting out high 500rwhp cars with their SC packages and with their H/C included, they are putting up mid 600rwhp numbers! If I had to pick one I would go with the SC.
MMS is putting out high 500rwhp cars with their SC packages and with their H/C included, they are putting up mid 600rwhp numbers! If I had to pick one I would go with the SC.