Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Need help with cam choice.......Thanks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2005, 03:56 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
1RADWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bayarea, California
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Need help with cam choice.......Thanks

Alright,
I'm ready to buy a cam and I'm not sure what exactly to get. I do want it to sound slightly lumpy, I want to go as big as possible being able to put all the stock bolt ons and tuned to be able to pass smog when it's time. What cam would you guys go with now and with future mods, keeping in mind I want it to be the best for future mods. even if I loose some of the benifits right now.
The cam I'm thinking is a comp cam 224/230 114 580 lift, I know the LSA should be 115 min. but I want the sound, is the lift to big???
The set up below are discribed broadly, but you guys get the idea. Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.

Set up know:

Stock short block
LS6 manifold
1.85 rockers
LT's/ORY
Procharger @ 7psi
All the other aftermarket bolt ons, MAF, TB etc. etc.

Set up in the near future:

Forged short block, and all the normal internal upgrades.
Ported 6.0 heads to lower comp.
????? Rockers
LT's/ORY
Procharger @ 10psi
Meth. injection
Bolt ons, same as above
Old 10-20-2005, 06:45 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
1RADWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bayarea, California
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was getting buried way down the page.....Still need help
Thanks
Old 10-20-2005, 06:54 PM
  #3  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

I think if you are using a cam with 0.580 lift, then using 1.85 rockers, you would seriously need check piston to valve clearance, and make sure your valvesprings etc are up to the job.
Thats in and around 0.630 lift you're talking about there, which is a LOT.
Old 10-20-2005, 06:58 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
 
2001WS6Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If it has a lope at idle it probably won't pass an emissions test that test for hyrocarbons. They are a byproduct of incomplete combustion (lumpy idle). I have a 214-224 (smooth idle) and just got under the wire in Ohio.
Old 10-20-2005, 07:03 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
1RADWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bayarea, California
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
I think if you are using a cam with 0.580 lift, then using 1.85 rockers, you would seriously need check piston to valve clearance, and make sure your valvesprings etc are up to the job.
Thats in and around 0.630 lift you're talking about there, which is a LOT.
I don't think I would run the 1.85's with that type of lift, So what if I just didn't worry about smog at this point. What would you guys run, I can always swap the cam at smog time.
Old 10-21-2005, 04:42 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
1RADWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bayarea, California
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TTT, no one has any input. I really would like some opinions from experienced people.
Thanks
Old 10-21-2005, 05:41 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Gary98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I asked Andy (owner of A&A Corvette) and he was able to get the 224/228 to pass in CA.
Old 10-21-2005, 08:12 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
1RADWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bayarea, California
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary98Z
I asked Andy (owner of A&A Corvette) and he was able to get the 224/228 to pass in CA.
That's what I have heard in a 114, I was thinking the 224 230 114 580 lift with 1.7 rockers or the 550 lift with 1.85 rockers, but I'm trying to find out if this is too much lift.......Still no one has been able to answer....I might just call Andy, I bought my clutch set up from him.
Old 10-21-2005, 08:27 PM
  #9  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,697
Received 1,142 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Your best bet might be to talk to Andy about what has passed in CA. I think a 224/230//115 should pass but I don't know personally.
Old 10-22-2005, 05:26 AM
  #10  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

We installed a Comp camshaft in the STS Camaro SS that we just finished. We had it specially ground. The spec's are 232/240 at .050 .595/.608 lift with a 115 lope separation. This cam works very well for us in forced induction applications, and yet it will still give the engine a lopey idle. This is the same camshaft profile we used in the twin turbo Corvette that we built earlier this year, and that customer passed emissions in Tenn.
Old 10-22-2005, 07:39 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
 
2001WS6Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1RADWS6
......Still no one has been able to answer....I might just call Andy, I bought my clutch set up from him.
That's because there is no answer. If you want to skate on the edge nobody can guaranatee
that it will pass emissions. If you want to be sure you have no problem you would have to choose a mild cam. Lift doesn't really play into the emissions much. I'm an E-check cert. tech in Ohio and have to repair cars to pass. As said before cars that have a lopey idle (large cam) are a crap shoot because of the high hydrocarbons they produce.
Old 10-25-2005, 08:24 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
1RADWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bayarea, California
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
We installed a Comp camshaft in the STS Camaro SS that we just finished. We had it specially ground. The spec's are 232/240 at .050 .595/.608 lift with a 115 lope separation. This cam works very well for us in forced induction applications, and yet it will still give the engine a lopey idle. This is the same camshaft profile we used in the twin turbo Corvette that we built earlier this year, and that customer passed emissions in Tenn.
Thanks for the responce, I am not really worried about passing smog at this point. I will just switch cams out at smog time, I am just looking for the best performance and still have the lumpy sound. But don't turbo's run cleaner than prochargers to beging with due to the recycling of exhaust? What would be the difference in a 232/240 LSA115 and a 232/240 LSA114



Quick Reply: Need help with cam choice.......Thanks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.