There is no doubt Jose knows his stuff, and his numbers surprised me. However, there is no doubt that the STS kit makes power. Is it possible that the advertising on STS's site exaggerates a little bit...sure. But I don't think it's any reason to think you've been ripped. Get the kit on, drive the car, if you don't like it then...then you can say that you feel you've been ripped. I see no reason why you would say that at this point.

 

i think that if you think that you got ripped you should take the turbo and beat your head with it.

 

I must say the first posts you made on the other site had me rolling...but jesus...what the hell are you talking about?

 

Dude you make me laugh....im seriously thinking this guy is

 

I dont what to think........Im still laughing

 

I always wondered who bought those STS systems... Now I know.

 

What up guys i'm back. Should we debate some more cuz i jsut smoked a bowl. You triple digit guys are tough

 

That made my week, dude!!!!

 

The lose of hp numbers suprise me too. But the STS kits still make great Hp. I have a 2002 T/A WS6 bone stock motor making 508 hp and 548 tq @8 psi with methanol injection on a STS GT67

 

Well, his sexual preference may or may not be known, but his intellectual arrogance is one which must be either elaborate jest or sincere and bold delusions of pomp and splendor. I'm sure it's the first one.

Either way, he seems harmless...

...Though, his obsession with French culture and STS are together too disturbing to dismiss...

 

Debate what? The worthiness of joining your cause to hold STS in open acknowledgement of their slightly misleading product information by preparing some petition or correspondence?



I can't speak for everyone else, but would you believe I'm a bit busy due to holiday season chores?


Uhhh... Why'd you get an STS, again?

 

Hey bboy,


First off I don't smoke pot, I was just kidding. Now that we got that cleared up I can continue with my lesson plan for you. I will call today's lesson "Bboy's personal Renaissance"

You are welcome for the French lesson, for those in our audience that do not know what "Je mange le chat, beucoup" means, my only triple digit quality, I will translate it at this time: I eat *****, alot.

Anyway, let me if I can identify the relevent points of your argument. You consider me an introverted genius...you surmised wrong young padewan english teacher! I have a double digit I.Q. and was kicked out of high school for marrying my sex ed teacher. I passed by the way; 4.91 g.p.a. So I guess I am proud that you I have met your standards of mediocrity

What is up with big words all of the sudden? There is a difference between precise and strategic application of word choice and being pretentious, e.g. your last post.

We must carefully choose our angle of communication that exacts the intended reception of a given audience. The post you mentioned earlier about ehtical business practices was clearly a Red Herring argument and an aberration of unqualified subjectivity on your part rather than an experienced based business law dissention. You made sound as if I was implementing the tactic of Marc Antony by "poisoning the well." In class, I can only imagine you as a loquacious oratorcal speaker that toots his own horn rather than one that adheres to a socratic teaching method that embraces out of ht box ideas that maybe religion reallyis a opiate for the masses. Pointless four hundred level english courses may not help you here. Were not talking about Shakespeare sonnets and blue bow bonnets, were talking about the combination of logic based reasoning and abstract thinking that combines a keen legal acumen founded with summa *** laude juris prudence.

I am entertained at your vacillating grading style. It holds me to a yo yo standard of excellence one second and deplorability the next. You speak as if you are divining from a "four corners doctrine" instead of focusing what is at hand. You must adhere to maintaning static loyality to wherever you are on the Koelberg ethical heirarchacy, I would guess that you started at "prior rights and social contacts" and dropped down to "good boy, nice girl." I'm not asking you to solve a simple parabola, I am asking you read the sts website and determine for yourself what kind of person wrote that statement, Optimus Prime, or Megatron.

Sincerily, STS AGNOSTIC

Works Cited, Sir: "Quote" -Marx


LET THE TURBO SCRABBLE BEGIN

 

Hey don't get defensive, it's okay whether you smoke pot or not. Renaissance? Well, it's true that now my surprise level has been "reborn."

Be careful with STD's not just STS's. Both can be incurred.

1. Your are very kind for doing so.

2. Introverted genius? That was also sarcasm. Surely, you perceived that. You are not on one count and not as you believe on the other.

What an intersting Christmas Eve dinner you are going to have!

To scrutinize posts using this contention is interesting. You are pretentious in telling me I'm pretentious, e.g. apply this lesson to your last post... An attack, that if valid, attacks your own argument as well... Hmm... Maybe a Relatavist Fallacy is at work here.

Yes, a Red Herring to divert the attention from the ethics of STS's business practices to... STS's business practices? Are you sure you know your logical fallacies.

Please, forgive me. No harm was intended...

Actually, I strongly detest those who toot their own horns. True greatness is recognized to the self, not promoted from the self. Please, if you learn anything from me, learn that. Society will appreciate you more... You will make more of a difference.

Now you engage the Fallacy of the Excluded Middle (aka False dichotomy)... Since I have taken English courses, which sadly are worthless (you said, "pointless") to you (Wait... Are you sure you regard yourself to truly be an intellectual? A true intellectual accepts study from all disciplines to keep what is useful/rational. Pointless, you say? how sad, ), it must then be false that I'm schooled in Logic since it is true I am schooled in Literature. Trust me, I know logic-based reasoning in addition. Unless, I'm insecure and you made no such implication, are you implying I don't understand logic?

Philosophy Minor: Emphasis in Logic and Continental Rationalism.

I know a little bit.

I hold you to the same standard I hold all people and myself... That everyone is worth something. I'm just tyring to teach you something, but you are fighting hard not to learn it. You address everything except this one lesson. I wonder if you don't see it or if you are ignoring it?

"Focusing on the topic at hand:" 1. Why'd you buy an STS? 2. Really, most of us are busy, but you are urged to lead the cause. Why don't you call them?

 

Bonsoir bboy,

That came out rather bad. Please don't take it condescendingly! Because after reading it, I would have; which is why I am signing off on a good note.


On a serious remark, the teaching method you choose is not right or wrong in my view. While I have my preference, I make no assertion as a panacea style to the rest of society. For what its worth, I think your better than most english teachers. And because most people tend to pick a partner as bright as themselves, I suspect that your wife (also a teacher) may be assisting in your web posting arguments.

Back to our cause, yes I am bored... no mensa meetings until January.

Until then we must demand STS change their statement in their webpage, a statement you conceded was false. This conclusion is backed by the other web poster guy that said one of his applications took 164 horse to operate the turbo. Just so you know, I cordially accept your offer of helping me elevate my status to that of the masses here at ls1tech. So please elucidate when my literary style is pomp or just jest, I wouldn't want to be considered an elitist.

If this doesn't enact a public acknowledgement on their part of misleading advertisement, wait till you see phase two. Au Revior

 

I guess my post came out to late. Just so you know I was writing it when you responded to the other one.

 

http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=32

Check out the Camaro SS that we installed an STS Turbo on. Bob

 

No... I would have never imagined you were capable of such actions... OnephatZ28, spewing dialogue that could be construed negatively? Are you sure you not too hard on yourself?


Compliments from you to me seem strange, I must say... almost as if you've confused our identities.

What a nice thing to say. Ah, your true character is back. I was confused for a bit.

I always work alone...

What does the cream of the crop do during such testing times? Trading wits with the underprivileged is such a poor substitute, I imagine.

Who's we? Why not just you?

My car insurance has gone up unfairly. You need to help me address this with them.

You wouldn't want to be considered an elitist? Such heart-warming modesty... Please, stop. You are a king who has laid his crown to feast among the people he rules out on the fields. How humble... You are in a class of your own.

On behalf of whom? It should most definitely enact such open acknowledgement... particularly, the rise of STS owners, which includes you. Why don't you write to them? Stand up for yourself, sir!

Why did you get an STS? Was their misleading pitch a factor?

Phase Two? Nothing illegal, right?

 

omg..this is some of the funniest **** i've ever read.

onephatZ28, what do you do for a living? i hope its something that is putting your great intellectual talent to use.

considering your previous conjecture on 'turbo math' was completely inaccurate..does it ever cross your mind that everything you say or think might be just as inaccurate? and yet you still debate as if you 'know' something.

the unibomber had a 170 tested IQ...Richard Feyman had an IQ tested I believe to be at 124...what does your alleged triple digit mensa level IQ prove exactly? its likely just as inflated as your turbo numbers.

 

Relax bboy,

Phase two is only longer essay's for the amusement of others. Phase three can only be appreciated at a geek level mensa status so posts on LS1tech would stop, and the beginning of arguing another ridicules cause would follow.

One thing about the underpriviledged, statistically they offer more to acedemia than those who are born rich. This is because affluent upbringings often times do not set off an internal mechanim to aspire. I began as underpriviledged and can better understand how the above theory is correct...so it is an honor to trade wits with an english teacher that prioritizes the growth of others rather than to his or her own financial status; noble.

 

Well, now, Phase Three would certainly leave us missing your presence but with the consolation of your lasting impression. Good luck with all of your phases.

Well, now, let's leave the sidelong discourse aside, now that we're speaking humbly, straight and true, and instead speak though the vulnerablilities of authenticity. I wholeheartedly agree with that sentiment and am impressed with you by the fact that it's yours to have been said.

Hurrah! Bravo, sir! I hope I'm not going out on a limb, but I'd venture to pose the idea that the overprivileged not only lack this, but function under a dynamic that causes them to fail, not financially, but in the path to individuation.

Correct Theory? Absolutely... And not becuase I said so.

I hope I am not naive in taking that as a compliment, so I'll accept it as straight and true. I'll never consider myself noble, but rather as traveling in the direction of nobility, which may be noble in itself. Good luck with your STS. Once you look past its shortcomings, it can be enjoyed. It is by many users here who enjoy some good numbers and some good ET's.