994rwhp 863rwtq
12-30-2005 | 07:16 PM
#21
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 2
From: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Thanks everyone.
Jugger- It -might- be able to do 26psi and 1100rwhp, but I think that would really be pushing the limits of that turbo.
PSJ- I think about 6,100
smokinhawk- We want to take the car into the low 8's, high 7's and I like the symmetry and packaging of twins over a ginormous single.
Probably would have ran pretty good, when it ran 8.9 @ 153 it was running at the 860rwhp level.
Jugger- It -might- be able to do 26psi and 1100rwhp, but I think that would really be pushing the limits of that turbo.
PSJ- I think about 6,100
smokinhawk- We want to take the car into the low 8's, high 7's and I like the symmetry and packaging of twins over a ginormous single.
Probably would have ran pretty good, when it ran 8.9 @ 153 it was running at the 860rwhp level.
12-30-2005 | 08:54 PM
#23
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 2
From: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Cool numbers...
But doesnt the cam used sort of go against what most people would reccomend for a turbocharged motor ?
But doesnt the cam used sort of go against what most people would reccomend for a turbocharged motor ?
But than again, so does the 221/229 113lsa cam that makes 1020rwhp in our hyd roller 347ci SBF. (5-speed manual)
IMO, people tend to get carried away with the trend of a real wide LSA for a turbo motor, and what type of split etc.
All that matters is the valve events. The duration, icl/lsa/ecl should all be byproducts of the valve events chosen for the combination, but for some reason many people do this the other way around.
12-30-2005 | 10:07 PM
#24
9 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 180
From: Norn Iron
I guess it would be interesting to compare graphs of yours against MM's ??
You have a cubic inch advantage, and fuel, but both power levels are similar for boost used.
But his had a much milder cam if I recall ???
You have a cubic inch advantage, and fuel, but both power levels are similar for boost used.
But his had a much milder cam if I recall ???
!!!
01-01-2006 | 10:00 PM
#27
Originally Posted by INTMD8
We were playing around with our shop car on the dyno and got some new numbers.
994rwhp 863rwtq through an (unlocked!
) turbo 400 and a full 4 inch exhaust system exiting at the bumper.
This is with a mid frame Innovative 88mm turbo, turbo system built in house.
Sportsman 370ci iron motor.
out of the box AFR 225 heads
LS6 intake, 78mm throttle body
236/242 112lsa cam
22psi boost, 23deg timing, C16 fuel
We are now disassembling the car and building a twin system
Graph -> http://www.ls1speed.com/artwork/turbo/graph2B.jpg
System Pics
994rwhp 863rwtq through an (unlocked!
) turbo 400 and a full 4 inch exhaust system exiting at the bumper. This is with a mid frame Innovative 88mm turbo, turbo system built in house.
Sportsman 370ci iron motor.
out of the box AFR 225 heads
LS6 intake, 78mm throttle body
236/242 112lsa cam
22psi boost, 23deg timing, C16 fuel
We are now disassembling the car and building a twin system
Graph -> http://www.ls1speed.com/artwork/turbo/graph2B.jpg
System Pics
thats HOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great job Jim! 
01-02-2006 | 02:35 PM
#35
Originally Posted by Noyzee
wow, great #'s!!!!
if that kit needs a home in a light car, let me know. lol
if that kit needs a home in a light car, let me know. lol
01-02-2006 | 02:42 PM
#36
Originally Posted by will62085
sorry to side track, but noyzee you still running a 6 speed with that 9.40 run?...isnt that what taner ran and currently the record?
with Speed inc.'s thread.
Thank you.
01-02-2006 | 06:06 PM
#39
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 2
From: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Originally Posted by 427
Sounds like fun.......now if we can find some really wide snow tires!!
Kurt
Kurt
