BOSS APPROVED!
607RWHP... With an offthe shelf STS!!!
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Frisco TX (Dallas Area)
LR4U, that's sweet. 
EPP keeps saying that 500 is the reliable limit on a stock bottom end (pistons). I don't doubt Bob, but some are going above that. Stay tuned and stay tight. GL 
I'm hoping for 650 @ 10 psi on pump gas with the 383 and T76 STS this summer. But there ain't nothing like the pleasure of dynamite proven numbers! Betcha you and Billy are tickled to death with the results! You are both to be cangratulated! <hi-five> Track time, track time! 
EPP keeps saying that 500 is the reliable limit on a stock bottom end (pistons). I don't doubt Bob, but some are going above that. Stay tuned and stay tight. GL I'm hoping for 650 @ 10 psi on pump gas with the 383 and T76 STS this summer. But there ain't nothing like the pleasure of dynamite proven numbers! Betcha you and Billy are tickled to death with the results! You are both to be cangratulated! <hi-five> Track time, track time! All... thanks for all the kind words... I appreicate Billy's help on this as well. I will be getting a good tracktime next week down at SAR. I think I am gonna drop the psi a little (blow-buy) has me concerned a little...
Bob is a smart guy... I am sure that he is close. I belive that 550 is where the safe spot is... we will see I guess.
Bob is a smart guy... I am sure that he is close. I belive that 550 is where the safe spot is... we will see I guess.
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Frisco TX (Dallas Area)
Originally Posted by longrange4u
Anyone have any thoughts on how or why it is that I gained 100 RWHP but almost no TQ at all? What is the TQ vs HP effect on the 1/4 mile time?
OBTW, hp is a calculation of torque delivered over time, so more hp = faster 1/4 as long as you can put it to the pavement. Peak torque isn't the measure of that, area under the torque curve is, and that is expressed by calculating hp. IOW, this torque curve (¯) makes more hp than this one (^). haha. Later!
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo TeeKay- You are dead on... My HP and TQ curve are allot flatter. I will have my Dyno sheet posted today I hope. Infact I will post my T-60 at 8.5lbs 506HP 634FPTQ vs my T-67 at 11.5lbs 607HP 639FPTQ.
Nice numbers!!!! better hurry up...I am pushing Quicksilverado to get his intercooler in so he can run faster than 11.35 in that truck.
As for the oil...I wonder if the oil pump might not be kicking up like its supposed to under boost and pushing oil out the turbo seals.
As for the oil...I wonder if the oil pump might not be kicking up like its supposed to under boost and pushing oil out the turbo seals.
Could be that the larger turbo is spooling later there for it is providing preasure more evenly and it is less of a Peak then more of the smoothing of the curve like TeeKay is talking about.
I should have internet in my room today man. I'll shoot you a couple IM's when I get on.
I should have internet in my room today man. I'll shoot you a couple IM's when I get on.
Wow, That's night and day difference. Thanks LR4U, that's exactly what I was looking for. I have always been curious of the hp/tq characteristics of the 67 compared to the 60. That makes me very happy and anxious to upgrade to the 67.
Looks like you got 2-3 degrees of tip in knock when you started the pull.
I always start my pulls from 2500 on the dyno. I've noticed that 2500-2700 produces fastest spool when compared to 2000rpms or 3000 rpms. About a 300-500 rpm difference.
I always start my pulls from 2500 on the dyno. I've noticed that 2500-2700 produces fastest spool when compared to 2000rpms or 3000 rpms. About a 300-500 rpm difference.
A/f Nice numbers, but your A/F is a little scary, It looks to be around in the low 13's, That is quite a bit lean for a F.I. setup, I would richen it up some, If you need some help let me know....
Moe, The AF on that dyno reads one full point high... (Dyno operator informed me of this). It was tuned for 11.5:1 all the way through at 8.5lbs. So for it to be at Low 12 is not to bad is it?
Ugh... Ok well that puts a damper on me wanting to run for my 10 sec run this weekend. I dont know where to take it for a tune anymore. Sean at Fastech did my tune for me... and I wont bring it back up there. So now what? Any reccomendations John?