Lss1350

http://www.superchargersonline.com/i...1sc_report.pdf

In pdf format.

Move if this is out of place.

MTBDOC

iTrader: (1)

Gee, an article published by Vortech that shows the Vortech is better than an ATI!!!

I am astonished BEYOND BELIEF....

...what where you expecting it to show?

Got Me SOM

iTrader: (2)

on the converse side another article written by ATI claims Vortech makes bogus claims.

and your point is...

MTBDOC

iTrader: (1)

Hint: first word in the title..."Good"

Lss1350

Im not trying to sway anyone one way or another, and I didn't say this was written by god. Just a test that I came across that I found interesting.

Slowhawk

iTrader: (12)

We've tested both back to back so many time's. I know 1 is better than the other per pound of boost I think every Mustang around here has a blower

DeltaT

iTrader: (5)

That test is also with the old P1 straight-blade impeller, which is like 1960's technology.

I think it's sad the way the 2 companies have painted themselves into a corner - ATI is against air-2-water ICs, and Vortech talks crap about Air-2-air ICs (though they sell them under the Paxton name).

Procharger seems to be winning the sales war in the Chevy arena, though.

Jim

Lss1350

Well what did you come up with? Which did you determine was better?

Urban Legend

iTrader: (5)

The saga continues. Vortech vs Procharger...

andereck

Still laughing my *** off at the avatars!!

ATI won. We'll never hear from Vortech again. Glad that's over for good now. jk