9 Second (STS) REAR mount setup
I would love to have the input of you educated folks on the subject. Please... nothing personal, but if you have never had a 10 second or faster car, state what you are basing your information upon.
What I am currently considering is:
Built 408: Would love to go this way, however there is a challenge in getting a large enough turbo to operate within its optimum efficiency range in a remote mount setup.... INPUT PLEASE!!
Second COA is a built 370 for the higher RPM capability to get a smaller turbo into its needed efficiency range... INPUT PLEASE!!!
I understand and have noted that the Dyno'd RWHP for an STS does not translate to the same performance as NA or a front mount (often referred to as Supra like performance). I am thinking I will need to see 800RWHP to see the solid 9's... INPUT PLEASE!!
Thanks guys!!
Jared
Trending Topics
For your interest: http://ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49274
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
...just a thought.
Frost... Thought about that too. Is there any reason why I shouldnt do that? What about competition? Are there limits to having two power adders?

-edit-
...although surely the haters will give you [more] **** about having 2 power adders.

-edit-
...although surely the haters will give you [more] **** about having 2 power adders.
Each one will need the same turbo.
Just thought you might like to see what we have been working on here at Race-Prep, I know the turbo is a little small for the app. but I am sure I can make at least 800RWHP with it and I have all the components to make it a well performing 1/4 mile terror! Check the link, I will be updating as we go along with the build!
-Bryan
http://www.race-prep.com/?p=31
Each one will need the same turbo.
If you size the turbos differently it's only because you want to get the proper driveability factors maximized. But this will result in less power output. You end up having to boost the smaller turbo to a higher pressure (if you want the same target output) and then you end up outside of the efficiency range which heats the intake charge more.
I'll be the first to tout the importance of driveability (quick spool, lower boost threshold) and for this reason I'd choose the higher displacement engine...less revs, more torque before boost.
But I'm a neophyte, I trust Jose's recommendation.



