Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

sequential twin turbo idea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2006, 02:07 PM
  #41  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
GrahamHill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What about a momentary pressure drop at the 1st turbo during transition??
Old 03-23-2006, 04:31 PM
  #42  
Teching In
 
lulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Suburb of Montreal
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Interesting information on a sequential turbo system.
Attached Thumbnails sequential twin turbo idea-tt1.gif   sequential twin turbo idea-tt2.gif   sequential twin turbo idea-tt3.gif  
Old 03-23-2006, 04:42 PM
  #43  
Staging Lane
 
hangslo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Call Rob at Extreme Turbo Shop ... he is in Lakeland, FL close to me here. I have talked to him about this before and he said that he can source the parts ... the guy knows his stuff.

He is in the process of building a twin PT106 540ci big block right now with the intention of running 5's in a doorslammer.

His number is 863-647-3700. www.extremeturboshop.com ... there are pics of his older mustang on there, but not his new one.
Old 03-23-2006, 04:54 PM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Ping King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

what about an eaton blower? it actually seems less complicated to have the turbo discharge into a blower. Very very common in big diesels.
Old 03-23-2006, 07:45 PM
  #45  
single digit dreamer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,757
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wolfy
what about an elec exhaust cutout wired thru a boost referenced relay? it sounds like youve got it pretty much all thoughtout except for the "check valve" in the downpipe...just thought id throw this out there...

-cam
thats exactly what i was thinking of except most electric cut outs wouldn't take alot of use like what i am thinking about.

Originally Posted by NOSjohn
Dual Ball Bearing turbo...you would see a big difference in spool time > 15-20%. Keep it simple.
i think going to twin 72's even with the ball bearings i will still have more lag than the single pt88 i have now and that is too laggy. i took alot of the fun out of my truck when i went from a single 76 to the 88 even though i gained 350hp. i am looking at geting the fun back AND gaining more power.

Originally Posted by lulu
here's another interesting sequential setup approach.
that squential set up is a neat idea but the big turbo would have to be a monster like a 94mm thumper for the power i am looking for. that means a huge down pipe.

Originally Posted by NXRICKY
I could see an issue with air surging. #1 turbo duning all the work until #2 is needed. once the #2 is needed the the gates or flappers open and a huge amount of flow is going to hit both sides of the #2 Boost pressure trying to spin out to the air filter, and exhaust trying to spin out the down pipe. At that moment in time what will happen, not sure, but your boost should show a stumble or dip until #2 can catch up.

Interesting for sure.
Ricky
the flapper on the intake side of turbo 2 wont open untill there is sufficent presure to push itself open. it wont have any control. just consider it a oneway valve. the exhaust opening to turbo 2 will reduce the volume of air to turbo one and may cause a momentary platou in boost till the 2nd turbo spools up. i think it would be smooth if the gate was opened at just the right time and at the right rate. that would take some fiddleing.

Originally Posted by RyanJ
You'd spend a 1/10th on a single with a valve or a ball bearing turbo custom made for you. But hey...if you want LOGS running into a maze of pipes, some being closed, causing sun-like surface temps and the cost of two turbos, pipe, valves, etc. go ahead.
1/10? i dont see that at all. first of all i do not want a single turbo. i would need a huge single to give me the potential i am looking for. last i checked a thumper isn't much of a cost diference from a pair of 72's. with my initial idea i could get by with one waste gate and the only extra parts would be a oneway flaper valve in one intake pipe and some kind of exhaust block off in one of the up or down pipes. about 2' of extra pipe. i think i can do this for about $700 more than a complete twin set up, not that much even if it fails i am not out that much.

now back to the real questions.

1)will it rudece lag, i think it will at least initial lag. i shoul be able to get from idle to 600rwhp very quickly.

2)will it still have the same top end potential, i dont see why not as long as the down pipe gate is not a restriction at all and a sliding full sized gate would not be a restriction at all.

3)the real question, will i be able to make the transition from a single to twins seamless? and will my the total time to full boost(~30psi?) happen any quicker or actuly take more time over all?

i want twins for a few reasons. one is i can put real air filters on them, another is i can get twin 3" exhaust on my truck easy but a single 5" would be a pain. twins are cool looking. i will be doing twins. that part of my research is done
Old 03-23-2006, 09:25 PM
  #46  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Parish.. Try one of these intstead of the electric cutout idea.





I will be running these on my car. They work off boost. The open almost instantly with almost no boost. You can control where they open with a manual boost controller. PM me if you want more info.
Old 03-23-2006, 09:33 PM
  #47  
single digit dreamer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,757
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

that does look like it would do the trick. i bet it opens fast. do they make a 3" version? it also looks prety durable.
Old 03-23-2006, 09:50 PM
  #48  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by parish8

i think going to twin 72's even with the ball bearings i will still have more lag than the single pt88 i have now and that is too laggy. i took alot of the fun out of my truck when i went from a single 76 to the 88 even though i gained 350hp. i am looking at geting the fun back AND gaining more power.
Negative...I've seen it done many times. One prime example is Chris Chow's car. Chris' car runs 2 - 70 series turbos on his under 400 c.i. (edit: chevy dry sump v-8) Buick Turbo Regal and it has now run a best of 7.97 in the 1/4. Call Fasttrackperformance.com ...or even call Precision Turbo. They own/build/supply parts for some of the fastest turbo cars out there - bar none.

I will be installing 2 - 67mm dBB turbos on a 370 c.i. motor going in a '99 T/A. They will push hard and make good power. It's all about the combination and sizing.

Twins turbos are cool, twin blonde hotties are even better.
Old 03-23-2006, 10:11 PM
  #49  
SSU Moderator
 
RyanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ok, maybe not 1/10 the cost...but 1/10 the effort and frustration and labor costs.

Maybe I just don't understand the goal here? Why not use truck manifolds? Why not run ball bearing turbos? I get you want to run a twin, I'll lay off the single stuff. But logs and a sequential setup IMO are a recepie for disaster...unless you make the log material .5" thick. Id do something like that porche set up above but with iron manifolds and the biggest wastegate you can find.
Old 03-23-2006, 10:19 PM
  #50  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Spenser309's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Coppell,TX
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what would a huge sudden drop in exhaust back pressure cause?

lol hell heres what you could do, set up an electric cutout on one of the downpipe. Keep it closed for street driving and have one tune for that(backpressure should affect the tune). Then open it up for the track and have another tune for it. (My EE side keeps telling me that current travels in the path of least resistance but i dont think that works for turbos.)

or find a pwm signal off the ms(IAC stepper motor may work, not sure), then use that to control how open the cutout is, gradually decrease it in a percentage function, then rewrite your ms with new code like the LS1 Low and high octane tables, with a scaler function between them. Find the relationship between how far you open the cutout and how much more fuel you need and have a table between the cutout open percentage and the LS1 style octance scaler function. IONO just throwing out ideas.
Old 03-23-2006, 10:21 PM
  #51  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Parish,

That is a 3" one I will be going from a 5" downpipe to dual 3" and placing these before the mufflers.
Old 03-23-2006, 10:25 PM
  #52  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Spenser309's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Coppell,TX
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lil did you know that the 5" downpipe will flow more than 2x 3" downpipes. 2x 3.5" will get you closer to, and almost the same amount of flow as the 5"
Old 03-23-2006, 10:28 PM
  #53  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
half-n-half's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Merrillville,In (chicago)
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokinHawk
wouldnt it be better if you wernt blocking off the downpipe but instead put one large wastegating in one of the up-pipes.
that way under the preset boost all the exhaust gasses go to one turbo, then as you hit say 10psi, the wastegate opens and feeds the other turbo.
youd probably need something like a 60mm gate
if i were to do it i would do it this way...

it is the closest thing to any other "factory" type system out there...porsche did it in the pic on this thread and from the looks of the mazda pic that is how they did it as well.

Just have to block the intake piping...use a staggler valve(whatever that is) it seems to be what the porsche is using.

Louie
Old 03-23-2006, 10:53 PM
  #54  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spenser309
lil did you know that the 5" downpipe will flow more than 2x 3" downpipes. 2x 3.5" will get you closer to, and almost the same amount of flow as the 5"
I am aware of that. However, on the street it will have to go through 3" exhaust and at some track events it will were a straight 5" downpipe.
Old 03-24-2006, 11:24 AM
  #55  
Teching In
 
lulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Suburb of Montreal
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by parish8
that squential set up is a neat idea but the big turbo would have to be a monster like a 94mm thumper for the power i am looking for. that means a huge down pipe.
Yes, space availability could be a problem for big turbos and I have to agree on a equal size twin turbo that give a nice symmetrical aesthetic look in the engine bay.

Originally Posted by lulu
here's another interesting sequential setup approach.
For those interested, here's some pictures of BMW sequential turbos diesel engine based on the same Opel's diagram.

Article link : http://autospeed.drive.com.au/cms/A_2544/article.html



Old 03-24-2006, 12:22 PM
  #56  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

lulu that the 3.0ltr diesel used in the 535d right?? i have heard its AMAZING!!! and even better if you let some guys chip it for you! hehe i think they are making 450lbsft and will do well over 30 to the gallon even when giving it some! hehehe

anyway great find!

i think yu will see more VNT/VG turbos coming on the market for petrol engines! they are starting to come through now. the only problems with these butties is they requier complex electronics to control them! the sequential system above looks all manual!

Chris.
Old 03-24-2006, 05:23 PM
  #57  
Teching In
 
ChevyLaxMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about using the same idea but apply a third turbo to avoid the drop in boost. With three turbos each responsible for a different rpm range you could have a car with 1000hp but still have the boost characteristics of a blower (boost from idle up) but without parasitic loss and it just might be the formula for the best street/strip setup out.
Old 03-24-2006, 07:13 PM
  #58  
single digit dreamer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,757
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChevyLaxMan
How about using the same idea but apply a third turbo to avoid the drop in boost. With three turbos each responsible for a different rpm range you could have a car with 1000hp but still have the boost characteristics of a blower (boost from idle up) but without parasitic loss and it just might be the formula for the best street/strip setup out.
i am trying to keep is as simple as i can.

right now i think i will step up to the ball bearing t72's and see how how laggy it is. i expect it to be worse than the single pt88 but if it is better then why bother. if it is the same or worse i will give the simple sequential idea a shot. just one block off valve and a one way valve should be all it takes.
Old 03-24-2006, 07:57 PM
  #59  
Teching In
 
ChevyLaxMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But just think of the possibilities of three or hell four turbos in sequence. I'm not convinced it's that complicated either.
Old 03-24-2006, 09:57 PM
  #60  
SSU Moderator
 
RyanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by parish8
i am trying to keep is as simple as i can.

right now i think i will step up to the ball bearing t72's and see how how laggy it is. i expect it to be worse than the single pt88 but if it is better then why bother. if it is the same or worse i will give the simple sequential idea a shot. just one block off valve and a one way valve should be all it takes.
Have you asked Tiago when he spools? He's got twin MP T70's on a 346 w/ less weight than you. EDIT: AND a six-speed.


Quick Reply: sequential twin turbo idea



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.