Dyno Characteristics - Roots vs Centrifugal Superchargers
05-10-2006, 03:03 PM
#41
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
....... Mind you those numbers were still climing and this was with some pretty high intake air temps. At some points they were up to 190.
Originally Posted by Nine Ball
Thats incorrect. The Magna on my C6 makes peak power at 7000 rpm, which also happens to be my rev-limiter. If I had the ***** to spin a stock bottom end to 7500 rpm, it might peak a tiny bit higher, but its still climbing, not falling off.
The main restriction on older Magnas was the 78mm t-body. With the 90mm t-body they pull pretty good at higher rpm.
Mine is making ~550 Dynojet rwhp at 5 psi max boost, stock LS2 with a 230/230 114 cam. Stock unported heads, with longtubes.
The main restriction on older Magnas was the 78mm t-body. With the 90mm t-body they pull pretty good at higher rpm.
Mine is making ~550 Dynojet rwhp at 5 psi max boost, stock LS2 with a 230/230 114 cam. Stock unported heads, with longtubes.
05, centrifical, centrifugal, compare, dyno, graphs, ls1, mustang, root, roots, sc, supercharger, superchargers, versus, vortech
