Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Switched from headers to manifolds with rear mount turbo (results inside)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2006 | 09:32 PM
  #21  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 8
From: Visalia, California
Default

The theory has a point... I understand where he is coming from. As the exhaust temperature spikes up under load the molecules will go nuts trying to get away from each other making the charge going to the turbo much better for spooling because that volume would have filled the pipe, rather than keeping it cool and dense, but not completely "filling" the pipe, then hitting the turbo.
Old 06-21-2006 | 09:37 PM
  #22  
solobaric's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, KY
Default

Could we have some more info on the actual paint itself? Where did you get it and what was the cost? Have you done your y-pipe as well?
Old 06-21-2006 | 10:27 PM
  #23  
Zombie's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by enginjoe
FWIW, Boyle's law (P1V1 = P2V2, given a constant temperature ideal gas) actually doesn't apply here because the exhaust gas isn't a constant temperature. It would acually be more suited to a front mount system.
Sorry, I meant Charles Law, not Boyles.... whoops. Fixed the posts. I mixed them up.
Old 06-21-2006 | 10:30 PM
  #24  
obZidian's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl.
Default

It would seem that this provides a good solution for those running rear mounts. With the turbo so far back, and heat being one of the factors needed in a turbo setup, it would seem logical to wrap or coat your exhaust to maintain or limit the amount of heat lose before the turbo inlet.

A front mount would also benefit but it being so close that the amount of heat lose wont be as great as running a turbo at the rear of the vehicle. Still, i would or i'm gonna either wrap or coat my hot pipes just to keep un hood temps done a bit besides adding more turbo efficiency, though not by a whole much.

Question, you mentioned a change in gears, ws that your rear gear to a 2.75 or your first gear in the th400?
Old 06-21-2006 | 10:35 PM
  #25  
Zombie's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by solobaric
Could we have some more info on the actual paint itself? Where did you get it and what was the cost? Have you done your y-pipe as well?
Paint was from home depot rated for 1200 degrees, thin it cost $3.

All pipes have been painted. Stopped by Jon's house (1320), the guy who did the work on my car and he had his headers painted and wraped in header wrap. We'll soon see if it makes a difference on his car. After swapping to headers his car would not make more than 7psi and it takes FOREVER to get there.

Talked to DarkBlueTA today too. When he mentioned the turbo in the back to a thermodynamic engineer where he works the guy said to paint the exhaust white too LOL.
Old 06-21-2006 | 10:36 PM
  #26  
Zombie's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by obZidian
Question, you mentioned a change in gears, ws that your rear gear to a 2.75 or your first gear in the th400?
Rear gear is going to be a 2.75 when ever I can get the swap done.
Old 06-21-2006 | 10:52 PM
  #27  
solobaric's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, KY
Default

Originally Posted by Zombie
Paint was from home depot rated for 1200 degrees, thin it cost $3.

Thanks!! Where in Home Depot do you get 1200 degree paint???? Is it in the normal paint section, lol! Can't think of where it would be!
Old 06-21-2006 | 10:55 PM
  #28  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 44,830
Likes: 1,251
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Maybe your headers had a leak.
Old 06-21-2006 | 11:37 PM
  #29  
JPATI's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default Great topic

Since a short pipe would mean hotter exhaust...what about trying to install a turbo in the factory cat location? There is already heat shields. I don't think ground clearance would be that bad(since it is raised). Running the airfilter and pipe to the TB might be problem... Maybe someone could figure it out. What do you think?
Old 06-21-2006 | 11:40 PM
  #30  
gametech's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 566
From: Stockbridge GA
Default

That is approximately where aps places the turbos in their twin kit for gto's. From the pictures I've seen, they look very low.
Old 06-21-2006 | 11:44 PM
  #31  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 8
From: Visalia, California
Default

Originally when I was going to build my kit, I was going to use 2 t3/t4 hybrids that would support just over 400hp each and run them off each bank and put them in those locations. After buying them, putting them up under there, i turned around and sold them. Flat out not enough ground clearance for my liking, the turbos would be the very first thing to make contact with the ground, and that's all I would need is to break turbos, especially while they're spooled up, and shooting broken pieces up the charge pipe.
Old 06-21-2006 | 11:53 PM
  #32  
Schantin's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 7
From: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Default

Originally Posted by dubs6
so you got more psi without turning up the boost. you added a more restrictive exhaust increasing pressure before the turbo. do you think this translates to more power? i could see how this translates to less lag b/c higher exhaust speed at lower rpm but i would think it would more restrictive for higher rpm's.
I can actually explain this with some "basic....and I mean basic physics (I'm hardly a rocket scientist ). The deal is based on "Bernoulli's Principle of flow (think I spelled that right). Anyhow, a given volume of air travelling through a tube of x diameter moves at a certain speed. If that tube is then restricted, the speed of the sir must increase to flow the same volume. This increase in speed (which also produces increased heat from friction) is what is driving the turbo to spool faster. So, this actually makes sense. Without the additional boost, it would probably not be a gain in power as the exhaust IS more restrictive.....but the increase HP from increased boost pressure is greater than the loss of HP due to exhaust restriction.

Simple, yes...... but it is a logical answer
Old 06-22-2006 | 12:16 AM
  #33  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 8
From: Visalia, California
Default

Very well put Schantin...
Old 06-22-2006 | 02:26 AM
  #34  
Zombie's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Schantin
I can actually explain this with some "basic....and I mean basic physics (I'm hardly a rocket scientist ). The deal is based on "Bernoulli's Principle of flow (think I spelled that right). Anyhow, a given volume of air travelling through a tube of x diameter moves at a certain speed. If that tube is then restricted, the speed of the sir must increase to flow the same volume. This increase in speed (which also produces increased heat from friction) is what is driving the turbo to spool faster. So, this actually makes sense. Without the additional boost, it would probably not be a gain in power as the exhaust IS more restrictive.....but the increase HP from increased boost pressure is greater than the loss of HP due to exhaust restriction.

Simple, yes...... but it is a logical answer
NO! I don't want to sound like a dick but that is not even close to the correct reason. Has nothing to do with the velocity, just the pressure.

EVERYONE WITH OTHER THEORIES PLEASE REPEAT AFTER ME!

Heating a gas creates volume. Volume with no where to expand to creates pressure.
Old 06-22-2006 | 02:29 AM
  #35  
Zombie's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Maybe your headers had a leak.
Prostock John, the headers didn't have any leaks, no carbon tracks anywhere. One of my manifolds has developed an audible leak right now and I haven't even noticed any difference in spool. I've run the car with an O2 sensor missing and the car would still make 8 psi even with the long tube headers, now thats an exhaust leak!

Why is it so complicated for people to understand that headers have a lot more surface area and thus remove heat from the exhaust faster? Maybe people just don't want to believe reality

Donny thinks it's vacuum!
Old 06-22-2006 | 03:52 AM
  #36  
Schantin's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 7
From: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Default

Originally Posted by Zombie
NO! I don't want to sound like a dick but that is not even close to the correct reason. Has nothing to do with the velocity, just the pressure.

EVERYONE WITH OTHER THEORIES PLEASE REPEAT AFTER ME!

Heating a gas creates volume. Volume with no where to expand to creates pressure.
Ok....but isn't the added pressure still a by-product of the heat + velocity speed due to the smaller diameter space? Not arguing....but I still like my theory (It's derived from the flow rate of air into the compressor of turbine engines, which are essentially turbos that drive a direct gear.)
Old 06-22-2006 | 04:46 AM
  #37  
1320's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: LV NV
Default

o raise the velocity you need to raise the pressure. Velocity is the by product only because as the exhuast gas exits the cylinder its only job is get to atmospheric pressure.....get out of the pipe. The size of the pipe is almost inrrelavent. Actually the larger the y pipe and larger the headers the better buts its small compared to the other problems. The volume is basically a given, the engine pretty much is only going to produce a given amount of exhuast for a given condition. The pressure can be raised by keeping heat in the exhuast pipe. To do that you want to pipe itself to be the same temp as the gas, so it doesn t look to transfer. The exhuast housing could be changed, but ideally you want the largest housing you can run to make the most power. Headers= about 1500 cubic inched of surface area, a 12 ft section of 3 inch exhuast is about 1300 cubic inches, manifolds.....what about 40? To largest heat dissipation is at the pint of highest temp to lowest....ie the headers at the there hottest point, so to have exhuast manifolds equal the heat heat disipation as headers....you would probably mount the turbo around 30-35 ft away down the exhuast.....imagine that, the turbo behind the car 20 ft or so, thats basically the comparison if you run headers to a manifold car. The key is run headers and keep the egt in the pipe. Ideally have the exhuast ceramic coated white then wrap. In the real world, 1200 degree white barbeque paint by itself will make a difference but fiberglass wrap is also decent at keeping heat in. Glass itself is a bad insulator but air is execellent, so wrapping the exhuast and trapping heated air close to the header surface deters heat transfer through the header.

For mycobra kit I m doing a twin turbo ls1 with about 18 inch long headers with turbos mounted next to the engine, the headers will be ceramic coated white then wrapped, and it should allow larger then normal turbos to be used or atleast larger exhuast housings and still get then going quickly.
Old 06-22-2006 | 05:43 AM
  #38  
LastBlack02SS's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, California
Default

so it would be good to say get your hotside parts powdercoated white? What wrap are you using to wrap everything and from where back are you doing so?
Old 06-22-2006 | 11:18 AM
  #39  
Zombie's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by 1320
Headers= about 1500 cubic inched of surface area, a 12 ft section of 3 inch exhuast is about 1300 cubic inches, manifolds
I think he means square inches.
Old 06-22-2006 | 11:26 AM
  #40  
99SS-T's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
Default

Zombie is a noob. Im a Rocket scientist and he definatly didnt have teh boost gauge hooked up right and the turbo was workin fine before. Kick him off the board he knows nothing!!


John


Quick Reply: Switched from headers to manifolds with rear mount turbo (results inside)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.