Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Dynomax ultraflow Q

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2006, 08:54 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
BlownBird68's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dynomax ultraflow Q

Changing out my flowmaster 40's on sbc procharger application, just too darn loud and drowney. Switching to dynomax ultraflows, however heres two dynomax ultaflow mufflers both have different internals

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

First one say internals are *Glass-wrap perforated tube
Second one says internals are *turbo style

Which design is quieter? Anyone know, or doesnt it matter? Also why are there ultraflow ss and welded any difference there?
Old 07-16-2006, 08:59 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
nitrorocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The 17229 is what I have on my car. Way quieter then the 50 series 3" dual flowmasters I had last year. I like them. They have a deeper rumble over the Flowmaster crackle.
Old 07-16-2006, 09:16 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
BlownBird68's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so im guessing the internal composit of the muffler doesnt matter, as long as its a dynomax ultrflow muffler?
Old 07-16-2006, 09:51 PM
  #4  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

For max power I like mufflers where the pipe goes right down the middle.



Quick Reply: Dynomax ultraflow Q



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.