T76 rear mount track results from tonight

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

08-17-2006, 09:28 PM

#21

Stupid Boost

Launching!

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jan 2006

Posts: 226

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Sounds like a 76 may be nice on a F-body.

Reply Like

08-18-2006, 09:12 AM

#22

OUTLAWZ RACING

TECH Addict

iTrader: (9)

Join Date: Mar 2004

Location: COLUMBUS GA.

Posts: 2,726

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

cant wait to see it on the 422!!!

Reply Like

08-18-2006, 10:40 AM

#23

Pro Stock John

LS1Tech Co-Founder

iTrader: (34)

Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Chicago, IL

Posts: 44,734

Likes: 451

Received 1,185 Likes on 766 Posts

Nice. Anyone have link where he can correct his times for sea level?

Reply Like

08-18-2006, 10:58 AM

#24

navymitch12

12 Second Club

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Nov 2005

Location: Texas

Posts: 1,017

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

http://members.tripod.com/~MY5LTRLXCPE/altitude.html

best time would be

10.910@129.15mph assuming 4900'DA

Reply Like

08-18-2006, 11:34 AM

#25

Zombie

10 Second Club

Thread Starter

iTrader: (2)

Join Date: May 2004

Location: Las Vegas

Posts: 2,498

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

I don't know if you can use NHRA correction factors since I'm turbo and can make up some of the loss of altitude, it's not as high of a percentage of loss, but it's still quite significant.

Reply Like

08-18-2006, 11:40 AM

#26

navymitch12

12 Second Club

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Nov 2005

Location: Texas

Posts: 1,017

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

well the chart had different section's for n/a and turbo cars

Reply Like

08-18-2006, 11:46 AM

#27

Zombie

10 Second Club

Thread Starter

iTrader: (2)

Join Date: May 2004

Location: Las Vegas

Posts: 2,498

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by navymitch12

well the chart had different section's for n/a and turbo cars

Scrolling down further owns me, but using the correction factors i'm getting

10.7 @ 127.6 @ 4900 DA, that seems pretty reasonable. My friend told me the difference was .2-.3 and 3-4 mph.

Reply Like

08-18-2006, 01:35 PM

#28

Pro Stock John

LS1Tech Co-Founder

iTrader: (34)

Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Chicago, IL

Posts: 44,734

Likes: 451

Received 1,185 Likes on 766 Posts

No I meant correct it for like 0 DA.

Reply Like

08-19-2006, 03:32 AM

#29

Mr_president

10 Second Club

iTrader: (38)

Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: Fresno, CA

Posts: 1,411

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

so what was your last best i cant seem to remember befor you had the 2.75s

Reply Like

08-19-2006, 06:39 AM

#30

lcvette

Launching!

iTrader: (3)

Join Date: Feb 2002

Location: Wilmington, NC

Posts: 281

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

great times man!!! especially at your elevation! keep it up

Chris

Reply Like

08-21-2006, 02:35 PM

#31

67Firebird455

12 Second Club

iTrader: (27)

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: Visalia, California

Posts: 2,539

Likes: 3

Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Dude, those are some nutty *** times! Freakin fast as hell! Nuking the rear, you're lucky it's still in one piece with that kinda power! Decent mph man. Get it all sorted out and you'll be 10's easily.