Unconventional Cam Choices
Everything i have learned in thermodynamics, and Engine Theory (as well as some real expensive engine simulators) tell me that it'll make more power and carry better with more exhaust duration to get all those gasses out and turning the turbo.
Besides it's only 8* overlap......
24x 23x, 64x, 61x on a 114.
They picked a bigger one for me at first but it was made for 7500ish rpms and that was just a little scary for me running 18-20psi. The cam they made for me shold be good to shift around 7k or 7200.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I'm running a 224/236-114 with my T76GTS / 388 LTx combo. I tried a 226/226-114 cam and was unhappy with the results, so I put the old "blower cam" back in. Since I've gone 146 mph in the quarter on 17 psi boost at 3750 lb using a log header, I tend to think the cam's not hurting me.
Mike
Id say the extra duration, and possibly overlap would be more likely to hurt a log setup, than a decent tubular setup.
TBH, and Ive said this before, with boost and tuning.....unless cam choices are extremely bad, pretty much most small-mild cams, will have the ability produce excellent power everywhere.
Big cams may have some ability to make good power at the top end, and also the ability to kill it everywhere else off boost.
Most people believe that a reverse-split is needed when you have alot of backpressure and/or a log header, but I have seen zero dyno evidence that this is true. In fact, the opposite may be true. I do know that Cam Motion really pushes the reverse-split turbo cams and when you press them for a reason why, they start blowing smoke.
I would really like to add something like 12 deg overlap just to see how bad overlap really is on a turbo motor. The new cam would be something like 230/242-111. It would be really interesting to see once and for all how that extra overlap would compare to my 224/236-114.
Mike

Mike
Mike
Was the 14psi change down to a muffler swap only ??





